<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Patent for Sensor- Old News?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/2007/08/10/new-patent-for-sensor-old-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2007/08/10/new-patent-for-sensor-old-news/</link>
	<description>Helping you figure out WTF Nikon&#039;s doing... D700x? D4? Rangefinder?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:35:15 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nikon Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Non-Bayer, Dichroic Sensor in the Works- Again?- Rumors and News - D3x, D700, D800, D400, Digital Rangefinder</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2007/08/10/new-patent-for-sensor-old-news/comment-page-1/#comment-639</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikon Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Non-Bayer, Dichroic Sensor in the Works- Again?- Rumors and News - D3x, D700, D800, D400, Digital Rangefinder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonwatch.com/?p=85#comment-639</guid>
		<description>[...] Remember this story from a while back where Nikon got a patent on a non-Bayer sensor? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Remember this story from a while back where Nikon got a patent on a non-Bayer sensor? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
