<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: D60 to Replace D40x?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/2007/12/30/d60-to-replace-d40x/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2007/12/30/d60-to-replace-d40x/</link>
	<description>Helping you figure out WTF Nikon&#039;s doing... D700x? D4? Rangefinder?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:40:10 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nikon Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; D60 Replaces the D40x? Part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2007/12/30/d60-to-replace-d40x/comment-page-1/#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikon Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; D60 Replaces the D40x? Part 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 02:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=406#comment-330</guid>
		<description>[...] Hey- remember this post that I&#8217;d actually forgotten about? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hey- remember this post that I&#8217;d actually forgotten about? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2007/12/30/d60-to-replace-d40x/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=406#comment-305</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t place too much credence in what this guy had to say.  If you check his &quot;D3 call,&quot; he had the specs almost completely wrong.  And the picture is clearly not a D3.

There have been so many D3-rumor postings that were so varied in their content that somebody had to be &quot;right.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t place too much credence in what this guy had to say.  If you check his &#8220;D3 call,&#8221; he had the specs almost completely wrong.  And the picture is clearly not a D3.</p>
<p>There have been so many D3-rumor postings that were so varied in their content that somebody had to be &#8220;right.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

