<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bjorn Reviews the Nikon D3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/2007/12/31/bjorn-reviews-the-nikon-d3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2007/12/31/bjorn-reviews-the-nikon-d3/</link>
	<description>Helping you figure out WTF Nikon&#039;s doing... D700x? D4? Rangefinder?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:35:15 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: phil</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2007/12/31/bjorn-reviews-the-nikon-d3/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 23:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=408#comment-310</guid>
		<description>[matt: I&#039;ve edited this to remove the email address- I&#039;m trying to NOT put it into text so that the spammers don&#039;t get it any quicker than they have to. Also- the comment. Also- the previous comment is a &#039;trackback&#039; that simply says that the other site referenced you- and appears to not be total spam.]

&lt;p&gt;The response to Bjorn&#039;s review is just spam for this other web site.  There is NO ORIGINAL CONTENT at all in this response, which just leads you back eventually to Bjorn&#039;s original post.  I suggest your remove this comment and ban the poster as a spammer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Phil Burton (you know me since I&#039;ve emailed you as [see the email address on the front page].  Look up your email archive.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[matt: I've edited this to remove the email address- I'm trying to NOT put it into text so that the spammers don't get it any quicker than they have to. Also- the comment. Also- the previous comment is a 'trackback' that simply says that the other site referenced you- and appears to not be total spam.]</p>
<p>The response to Bjorn&#8217;s review is just spam for this other web site.  There is NO ORIGINAL CONTENT at all in this response, which just leads you back eventually to Bjorn&#8217;s original post.  I suggest your remove this comment and ban the poster as a spammer.</p>
<p>Phil Burton (you know me since I&#8217;ve emailed you as [see the email address on the front page].  Look up your email archive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Review: Nikon D3 DSLR at Imaging Insider</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2007/12/31/bjorn-reviews-the-nikon-d3/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Review: Nikon D3 DSLR at Imaging Insider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 22:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=408#comment-307</guid>
		<description>[...] Read More&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read More&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
