<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CaptureNX V2 Close to Release?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/05/20/capturenx-v2-close-to-release/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/05/20/capturenx-v2-close-to-release/</link>
	<description>Helping you figure out WTF Nikon&#039;s doing... D700x? D4? Rangefinder?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:40:10 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nikon Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; CaptureNX 2.0 : Official Announcement June 3rd in Europe? Maybe Elsewhere?</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/05/20/capturenx-v2-close-to-release/comment-page-1/#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikon Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; CaptureNX 2.0 : Official Announcement June 3rd in Europe? Maybe Elsewhere?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 16:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=490#comment-488</guid>
		<description>[...] on with the CaptureNX 2.0 imminent release rumor:  Hi [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on with the CaptureNX 2.0 imminent release rumor:  Hi [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjames</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/05/20/capturenx-v2-close-to-release/comment-page-1/#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator>mjames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 02:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=490#comment-478</guid>
		<description>I agree...it&#039;s way too slow. That should be a major fix in v2. I actually can&#039;t see a huge difference in speed between my new iMac and my old powerbook G4...that&#039;s right - powerbook, not mac book pro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree&#8230;it&#8217;s way too slow. That should be a major fix in v2. I actually can&#8217;t see a huge difference in speed between my new iMac and my old powerbook G4&#8230;that&#8217;s right &#8211; powerbook, not mac book pro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcv</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/05/20/capturenx-v2-close-to-release/comment-page-1/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>mcv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 18:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=490#comment-475</guid>
		<description>Oh, and it&#039;s slow as heck too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and it&#8217;s slow as heck too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcv</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/05/20/capturenx-v2-close-to-release/comment-page-1/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>mcv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 18:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=490#comment-474</guid>
		<description>I think a lot of people (myself included) use it primarily for it&#039;s rendering of NEFs, which is better/different to other software, and it&#039;s U-point technology. That alone saves me a lot of time instead of having to use use masks when it&#039;s not necessary.

Now that Lightroom 2 will incorporate a similar feature, I may stop using it altogether, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a lot of people (myself included) use it primarily for it&#8217;s rendering of NEFs, which is better/different to other software, and it&#8217;s U-point technology. That alone saves me a lot of time instead of having to use use masks when it&#8217;s not necessary.</p>
<p>Now that Lightroom 2 will incorporate a similar feature, I may stop using it altogether, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjames</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/05/20/capturenx-v2-close-to-release/comment-page-1/#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>mjames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 16:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=490#comment-473</guid>
		<description>I must agree with wings. I&#039;ve actually switched from using Photoshop primarily (after 10 years) to using Capture NX becuase of the U-Point technology. 

The UI sucks and I hate that you can&#039;t move steps around, but hopefully that will improve. I&#039;d love to see it be able to understand other programs ratings as well cause I can&#039;t get View NX to work worth a darn on my machine...

Great site btw - just stumbled onto it and am glad I did...great work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must agree with wings. I&#8217;ve actually switched from using Photoshop primarily (after 10 years) to using Capture NX becuase of the U-Point technology. </p>
<p>The UI sucks and I hate that you can&#8217;t move steps around, but hopefully that will improve. I&#8217;d love to see it be able to understand other programs ratings as well cause I can&#8217;t get View NX to work worth a darn on my machine&#8230;</p>
<p>Great site btw &#8211; just stumbled onto it and am glad I did&#8230;great work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wings</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/05/20/capturenx-v2-close-to-release/comment-page-1/#comment-472</link>
		<dc:creator>wings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 16:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=490#comment-472</guid>
		<description>I use the control point feature often and find that it works quite well. It has its limitations, of course, but given that I&#039;m already using Capture NX for its fantastic colour rendering, it&#039;s not inconvenient.

I agree that the UI is horrendous. Batch processing is incredibly painful as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use the control point feature often and find that it works quite well. It has its limitations, of course, but given that I&#8217;m already using Capture NX for its fantastic colour rendering, it&#8217;s not inconvenient.</p>
<p>I agree that the UI is horrendous. Batch processing is incredibly painful as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

