<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon: &#8216;D700? What D700?&#8217; The Leaked Magazine Shots Are Real?!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/06/21/nikon-d700-what-d700-the-leaked-magazine-shots-are-real/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/06/21/nikon-d700-what-d700-the-leaked-magazine-shots-are-real/</link>
	<description>Helping you figure out WTF Nikon&#039;s doing... D700x? D4? Rangefinder?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:35:15 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Digitalkamera Magazin</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/06/21/nikon-d700-what-d700-the-leaked-magazine-shots-are-real/comment-page-1/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>Digitalkamera Magazin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 11:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/06/21/nikon-d700-what-d700-the-leaked-magazine-shots-are-real/#comment-588</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Nikon D700...&lt;/strong&gt;

Bei der Nikon D700 handelt es sich um eine vollformatkamera die im sich im Mittelklasse-Bereich bewegt. sie bietet fast das gleiche Leistungsspektrum wie Nikon´s Spitzenmodell D3. Die D700 verfügt über einen CMOS-Sensor der Fotos mit 12,1 Megapixel ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Nikon D700&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Bei der Nikon D700 handelt es sich um eine vollformatkamera die im sich im Mittelklasse-Bereich bewegt. sie bietet fast das gleiche Leistungsspektrum wie Nikon´s Spitzenmodell D3. Die D700 verfügt über einen CMOS-Sensor der Fotos mit 12,1 Megapixel &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: De geruchten worden sterker &#8212; Thomas Bouve fotografie</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/06/21/nikon-d700-what-d700-the-leaked-magazine-shots-are-real/comment-page-1/#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator>De geruchten worden sterker &#8212; Thomas Bouve fotografie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/06/21/nikon-d700-what-d700-the-leaked-magazine-shots-are-real/#comment-555</guid>
		<description>[...] van een D3 en de form factor van een D300. De afgelopen paar dagen zijn de geruchten steeds meer concreter geworden met één online shop die het toestel zelfs al te koop aanbiedt (pre-order weliswaar en [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] van een D3 en de form factor van een D300. De afgelopen paar dagen zijn de geruchten steeds meer concreter geworden met één online shop die het toestel zelfs al te koop aanbiedt (pre-order weliswaar en [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zoetmb</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/06/21/nikon-d700-what-d700-the-leaked-magazine-shots-are-real/comment-page-1/#comment-547</link>
		<dc:creator>zoetmb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 03:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/06/21/nikon-d700-what-d700-the-leaked-magazine-shots-are-real/#comment-547</guid>
		<description>If it&#039;s from a design studio, yes.  If it&#039;s from a printing plant, no.  Printing plants do not set type or do layout anymore.   They&#039;re sent Quark, In-Design, Photoshop or Illustrator files.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s from a design studio, yes.  If it&#8217;s from a printing plant, no.  Printing plants do not set type or do layout anymore.   They&#8217;re sent Quark, In-Design, Photoshop or Illustrator files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deep Bokeh</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/06/21/nikon-d700-what-d700-the-leaked-magazine-shots-are-real/comment-page-1/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Deep Bokeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/06/21/nikon-d700-what-d700-the-leaked-magazine-shots-are-real/#comment-546</guid>
		<description>??? 

It could easily be a discarded proof.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>??? </p>
<p>It could easily be a discarded proof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zoetmb</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/06/21/nikon-d700-what-d700-the-leaked-magazine-shots-are-real/comment-page-1/#comment-545</link>
		<dc:creator>zoetmb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/06/21/nikon-d700-what-d700-the-leaked-magazine-shots-are-real/#comment-545</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve previously posted that the D700 brochure looks real to me, but I just noticed something in the body copy that mentions the AF-51 point:  there&#039;s a widow:  at the fourth line from the bottom it says &quot;Nikon system&#039;&quot; at the end of the line and the &quot;s&quot; (as &quot;system&#039;s) on the next line.   This is a violation of all proper printing conventions.

Someone else posted on another site that it&#039;s unusual for Nikon to left justify the text - it&#039;s usually full justified.

This is either really lousy typographic design or it&#039;s a fake.  The problem is that there&#039;s no home printer that I know of that can print something that large, which is why I originally thought it had to be real.    I suppose if someone worked in an office with a large format printer, this could be accomplished to look like it was coming off of a printing press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve previously posted that the D700 brochure looks real to me, but I just noticed something in the body copy that mentions the AF-51 point:  there&#8217;s a widow:  at the fourth line from the bottom it says &#8220;Nikon system&#8217;&#8221; at the end of the line and the &#8220;s&#8221; (as &#8220;system&#8217;s) on the next line.   This is a violation of all proper printing conventions.</p>
<p>Someone else posted on another site that it&#8217;s unusual for Nikon to left justify the text &#8211; it&#8217;s usually full justified.</p>
<p>This is either really lousy typographic design or it&#8217;s a fake.  The problem is that there&#8217;s no home printer that I know of that can print something that large, which is why I originally thought it had to be real.    I suppose if someone worked in an office with a large format printer, this could be accomplished to look like it was coming off of a printing press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
