<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Nikon D90 Info &#8211; Kinda&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/12/more-nikon-d90-info-kinda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/12/more-nikon-d90-info-kinda/</link>
	<description>Helping you figure out WTF Nikon&#039;s doing... D700x? D4? Rangefinder?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:40:10 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Deep Bokeh</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/12/more-nikon-d90-info-kinda/comment-page-1/#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator>Deep Bokeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/12/more-nikon-d90-info-kinda/#comment-673</guid>
		<description>Nikon has been pretty consistent with it&#039;s model levels. The D70 and D80 inherited the sensor from the D100 and D200 respectively-- but without the expensive hardware-- namely, the metal body, meter coupling, high fps processor, PC sync, etc. What they have NOT done is capriciously shut off capabilities in software to protect higher-end cameras-- I have a lot of respect for Nikon because of that policy.. 

Given that, I don&#039;t expect manual lens metering, weather sealing, or 8 fps on the D90. However, I do expect liveview and  ISO 6400,... and certainly an AF motor and Commander Mode. Some time later, I expect Nikon to offer the same sensor in an even cheaper body similar to the D60.

If the D90 followed the D60 design, I would view that as Nikon destroying a segment of their market... and would be very disappointed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikon has been pretty consistent with it&#8217;s model levels. The D70 and D80 inherited the sensor from the D100 and D200 respectively&#8211; but without the expensive hardware&#8211; namely, the metal body, meter coupling, high fps processor, PC sync, etc. What they have NOT done is capriciously shut off capabilities in software to protect higher-end cameras&#8211; I have a lot of respect for Nikon because of that policy.. </p>
<p>Given that, I don&#8217;t expect manual lens metering, weather sealing, or 8 fps on the D90. However, I do expect liveview and  ISO 6400,&#8230; and certainly an AF motor and Commander Mode. Some time later, I expect Nikon to offer the same sensor in an even cheaper body similar to the D60.</p>
<p>If the D90 followed the D60 design, I would view that as Nikon destroying a segment of their market&#8230; and would be very disappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike3k</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/12/more-nikon-d90-info-kinda/comment-page-1/#comment-672</link>
		<dc:creator>mike3k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/12/more-nikon-d90-info-kinda/#comment-672</guid>
		<description>Does it still have the D80&#039;s internal AF motor? I want to upgrade from my D40x for that reason alone. I really like my 50mm/f1.8 lens but I have a hard time using manual focus with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it still have the D80&#8217;s internal AF motor? I want to upgrade from my D40x for that reason alone. I really like my 50mm/f1.8 lens but I have a hard time using manual focus with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

