<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: D90 Movies Look Like Jello! Oh No!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/23/d90-movies-look-like-jello-oh-no/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/23/d90-movies-look-like-jello-oh-no/</link>
	<description>Helping you figure out WTF Nikon&#039;s doing... D700x? D4? Rangefinder?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:40:10 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: max123</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/23/d90-movies-look-like-jello-oh-no/comment-page-1/#comment-772</link>
		<dc:creator>max123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=719#comment-772</guid>
		<description>canon&#039;s hv20 does that too. and it&#039;s a camcorder :D

but here&#039;s real usage of d90. looks great. 

http://www.vimeo.com/1791011
http://www.vimeo.com/1774030
http://www.vimeo.com/1775787</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>canon&#8217;s hv20 does that too. and it&#8217;s a camcorder <img src='http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>but here&#8217;s real usage of d90. looks great. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.vimeo.com/1791011" rel="nofollow">http://www.vimeo.com/1791011</a><br />
<a href="http://www.vimeo.com/1774030" rel="nofollow">http://www.vimeo.com/1774030</a><br />
<a href="http://www.vimeo.com/1775787" rel="nofollow">http://www.vimeo.com/1775787</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nebularb</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/23/d90-movies-look-like-jello-oh-no/comment-page-1/#comment-770</link>
		<dc:creator>nebularb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 21:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=719#comment-770</guid>
		<description>Could this be caused or accentuated by the use of stabilised (VR) lens?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could this be caused or accentuated by the use of stabilised (VR) lens?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hayesk</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/23/d90-movies-look-like-jello-oh-no/comment-page-1/#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator>hayesk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=719#comment-769</guid>
		<description>This should change with shutter speed. Is the D90&#039;s video mode fixed to a shutter speed? A faster one should have less wiggle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This should change with shutter speed. Is the D90&#8217;s video mode fixed to a shutter speed? A faster one should have less wiggle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matrix</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/23/d90-movies-look-like-jello-oh-no/comment-page-1/#comment-768</link>
		<dc:creator>Matrix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=719#comment-768</guid>
		<description>Or maybe a stablised lens...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or maybe a stablised lens&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rthomas</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/23/d90-movies-look-like-jello-oh-no/comment-page-1/#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator>rthomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 23:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=719#comment-766</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s not good! I&#039;ll stick to a regular video camera, thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s not good! I&#8217;ll stick to a regular video camera, thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scalesusa</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/23/d90-movies-look-like-jello-oh-no/comment-page-1/#comment-765</link>
		<dc:creator>scalesusa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 22:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=719#comment-765</guid>
		<description>Here are some examples of D90 and 5D MK II

http://nrkbeta.no/bilder-og-video-av-canon-5d-mark-ii/
http://www.dagbladet.no/kultur/2008/09/21/547601.html
http://www.dagbladet.no/kultur/2008/09/21/547601.html
http://blog.chasejarvis.com/blog/2008_08_01_archive.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are some examples of D90 and 5D MK II</p>
<p><a href="http://nrkbeta.no/bilder-og-video-av-canon-5d-mark-ii/" rel="nofollow">http://nrkbeta.no/bilder-og-video-av-canon-5d-mark-ii/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.dagbladet.no/kultur/2008/09/21/547601.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dagbladet.no/kultur/2008/09/21/547601.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.dagbladet.no/kultur/2008/09/21/547601.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dagbladet.no/kultur/2008/09/21/547601.html</a><br />
<a href="http://blog.chasejarvis.com/blog/2008_08_01_archive.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.chasejarvis.com/blog/2008_08_01_archive.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scalesusa</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/23/d90-movies-look-like-jello-oh-no/comment-page-1/#comment-761</link>
		<dc:creator>scalesusa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=719#comment-761</guid>
		<description>This is a result of using a electronic rolling shutter rather than a mechanical one.  The photosites are scanned sequentially, and movement of the camera causes the next row scanned to be slightly misallined.  

Certainly Canon will have a similar one, however, from clips I&#039;ve seen, it appears a little less noticible.  Canon has a lot of experience making video cameras, so they may have a slight advantage here.

As long as you learn to use the camera within its limitations, there should be no problem.  If you want to wave your camera back and forth, no one would want to see your video in any event.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a result of using a electronic rolling shutter rather than a mechanical one.  The photosites are scanned sequentially, and movement of the camera causes the next row scanned to be slightly misallined.  </p>
<p>Certainly Canon will have a similar one, however, from clips I&#8217;ve seen, it appears a little less noticible.  Canon has a lot of experience making video cameras, so they may have a slight advantage here.</p>
<p>As long as you learn to use the camera within its limitations, there should be no problem.  If you want to wave your camera back and forth, no one would want to see your video in any event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

