Comments on: D90 Jello Shots- Technical Explanations- CCD vs CMOS http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/28/d90-jello-shots-technical-explanations-ccd-vs-cmos/ Helping you figure out WTF Nikon's doing... D700x? D4? Rangefinder? Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:40:10 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: icelandphotoblog http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/28/d90-jello-shots-technical-explanations-ccd-vs-cmos/comment-page-1/#comment-786 icelandphotoblog Sat, 04 Oct 2008 09:47:31 +0000 http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=749#comment-786 hehe... that picture is just brilliant! I think the movie samples speak for themselves... at least those video's I have seen in "normal" use doesn't show this jello effect so it isn't something which you can't avoid. It also doesn't seem limiting except maybe in very high action shoot. Fortunatly I'm mostly landscape and nature photographer so this feature will be used in "proper" manner hehe.. :) Only thing I wish that D90 have but doesn't is full HD movie (1080p) but maybe that comes in the more expensive D3x or D4. :) hehe… that picture is just brilliant!

I think the movie samples speak for themselves… at least those video’s I have seen in “normal” use doesn’t show this jello effect so it isn’t something which you can’t avoid. It also doesn’t seem limiting except maybe in very high action shoot. Fortunatly I’m mostly landscape and nature photographer so this feature will be used in “proper” manner hehe.. :)

Only thing I wish that D90 have but doesn’t is full HD movie (1080p) but maybe that comes in the more expensive D3x or D4. :)

]]> By: scalesusa http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/28/d90-jello-shots-technical-explanations-ccd-vs-cmos/comment-page-1/#comment-778 scalesusa Mon, 29 Sep 2008 04:20:54 +0000 http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=749#comment-778 Having watched the examples of the rolling shutter for both Nikon and Canon, it appears that this is only a problem with someone who hasn't a clue, and is trying to jerk the camera around rapidly to prove a point. You can also demonstrate that it won't survive violent shock by hitting it hard with a hammer. While this does show you can make the frame skew and wobble, it is far beyond normal video making, and any video that jerked the camera around this sharply would not be worth watching. Any halfway decent photographer can work around what has been shown so far. I haven't seen a problem with either camera with videos made in a proper manner. The Canon 5D does appear to have less of the artifacts, but is 2.6 times the price of the D90. As technology advances with faster cmos sensors, expect things to get much better. Having watched the examples of the rolling shutter for both Nikon and Canon, it appears that this is only a problem with someone who hasn’t a clue, and is trying to jerk the camera around rapidly to prove a point. You can also demonstrate that it won’t survive violent shock by hitting it hard with a hammer. While this does show you can make the frame skew and wobble, it is far beyond normal video making, and any video that jerked the camera around this sharply would not be worth watching. Any halfway decent photographer can work around what has been shown so far.

I haven’t seen a problem with either camera with videos made in a proper manner. The Canon 5D does appear to have less of the artifacts, but is 2.6 times the price of the D90. As technology advances with faster cmos sensors, expect things to get much better.

]]> By: zoetmb http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/28/d90-jello-shots-technical-explanations-ccd-vs-cmos/comment-page-1/#comment-777 zoetmb Mon, 29 Sep 2008 04:11:34 +0000 http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=749#comment-777 That picture is completely inappropriate. It should have been a video. Be more careful next time! That picture is completely inappropriate. It should have been a video. Be more careful next time!

]]>