<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Red Corp, &#8220;We got your modular digital Nikon body right here. Choke on it!&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/15/red-corp-we-got-your-modular-digital-nikon-body-right-here-choke-on-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/15/red-corp-we-got-your-modular-digital-nikon-body-right-here-choke-on-it/</link>
	<description>Helping you figure out WTF Nikon&#039;s doing... D700x? D4? Rangefinder?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:35:15 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Deep Bokeh</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/15/red-corp-we-got-your-modular-digital-nikon-body-right-here-choke-on-it/comment-page-1/#comment-844</link>
		<dc:creator>Deep Bokeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=839#comment-844</guid>
		<description>Roadmaps work when you are introducing an upgradeable system-- or when you don&#039;t have existing products in a category. 

Nikon produced a roadmap for the introduction of the PC•E lenses. Made sense since it would entice pros to buy the D3 and wouldn&#039;t cannibalize sales of existing lenses (except the 85mm PC-Micro, whose sales were probably negligible).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roadmaps work when you are introducing an upgradeable system&#8211; or when you don&#8217;t have existing products in a category. </p>
<p>Nikon produced a roadmap for the introduction of the PC•E lenses. Made sense since it would entice pros to buy the D3 and wouldn&#8217;t cannibalize sales of existing lenses (except the 85mm PC-Micro, whose sales were probably negligible).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baileyat</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/15/red-corp-we-got-your-modular-digital-nikon-body-right-here-choke-on-it/comment-page-1/#comment-843</link>
		<dc:creator>baileyat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 10:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=839#comment-843</guid>
		<description>Not much ado about nothing.  Newsrooms are shrinking.  Photo Journalists are increasingly being pressured to use video.  Red is one of the few if only outfits that offers a quality product at this low price range.  Leica is old news.  They are worth nothing.  Their name means less and less everyday.  Their glass is great and their cameras suck.  Product advertisement shots need products like this.  Major studios are not using the red setup, they are spending a lot more.  Red is targeted at high end indie filmmakers and low end Hollywood - not major motion pictures.  Red has spent a lot of money to get names like Peter Jackson using their product.  Your statements reveal a blatant ignorance.  Just because you would not buy does not mean there are not plenty of people lining up to put money down.  I promise if they developed this product they would sell many more than 50 or a 100.  You cynicism is a little antiquated.

Nikon could care less like United Airlines doesn&#039;t care about Southwest.  They care.  Red has a substantial capital backing and I wouldn&#039;t bet on a recession thwarting that.  All of it was vaporware 4 years ago, look where they are now.

&quot;Imagine having to post process a bunch of those.&quot; Its a little thing called vision.  Imagine digital cameras 8 years ago, 540 x 480? I bet you laughed at a megapixel then too.  Much ado about your ignorance and lack of vision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not much ado about nothing.  Newsrooms are shrinking.  Photo Journalists are increasingly being pressured to use video.  Red is one of the few if only outfits that offers a quality product at this low price range.  Leica is old news.  They are worth nothing.  Their name means less and less everyday.  Their glass is great and their cameras suck.  Product advertisement shots need products like this.  Major studios are not using the red setup, they are spending a lot more.  Red is targeted at high end indie filmmakers and low end Hollywood &#8211; not major motion pictures.  Red has spent a lot of money to get names like Peter Jackson using their product.  Your statements reveal a blatant ignorance.  Just because you would not buy does not mean there are not plenty of people lining up to put money down.  I promise if they developed this product they would sell many more than 50 or a 100.  You cynicism is a little antiquated.</p>
<p>Nikon could care less like United Airlines doesn&#8217;t care about Southwest.  They care.  Red has a substantial capital backing and I wouldn&#8217;t bet on a recession thwarting that.  All of it was vaporware 4 years ago, look where they are now.</p>
<p>&#8220;Imagine having to post process a bunch of those.&#8221; Its a little thing called vision.  Imagine digital cameras 8 years ago, 540 x 480? I bet you laughed at a megapixel then too.  Much ado about your ignorance and lack of vision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zoetmb</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/15/red-corp-we-got-your-modular-digital-nikon-body-right-here-choke-on-it/comment-page-1/#comment-842</link>
		<dc:creator>zoetmb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 05:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=839#comment-842</guid>
		<description>I have no idea what everyone is getting so excited about.   No one is buying Leica and Leica looks like a bargain compared to this.    In the professional video world, no one buys this stuff - they rent it, so the total cost doesn&#039;t mean that much - it&#039;s what it costs per day that counts.   And film budgets far exceed still photography budgets.    Any major film from a major studio costs at least $100 million to make.    It&#039;s the rare still photography shoot that costs more than a few hundred thousand and those are pretty rare.  So what&#039;s the market besides drooling tech nerds who couldn&#039;t afford it in 100 years?   And what exactly would they use it for if they could afford it.  A camera like this doesn&#039;t exactly lend itself to discrete candid shooting.   To me, this camera is the Hummer of photography.

Of course you can upgrade the camera when the &quot;brain&quot; costs more than most other full cameras.  The FF Scarlet brain is going to cost $7K (that&#039;s without viewfinder, power supply, storage, lenses, etc.)   The FF Epic &quot;brain&quot; is going to cost $35,000 (without all other stuff.)

Nikon couldn&#039;t care less...this is not a market they would ever want to be in.    How many is Red going to sell of these?  50?  100?    

And let&#039;s take a look at the other sensors.   The 2/3&quot; sensor is 6.3% the size of full frame.   The S35 sensor is 52% the size of full frame (about 20% larger than DX).   Now the 645 and 617 sensors are impressive, but they&#039;re just drawings.    And the 617 sensor creates a 261 MP image.   Imagine having to post-process a bunch of those!!

And best of all, this is all vaporware.   None (or virtually none) of it exists.     

My bet is that in this recession, some of this never gets manufactured.

Much ado about nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea what everyone is getting so excited about.   No one is buying Leica and Leica looks like a bargain compared to this.    In the professional video world, no one buys this stuff &#8211; they rent it, so the total cost doesn&#8217;t mean that much &#8211; it&#8217;s what it costs per day that counts.   And film budgets far exceed still photography budgets.    Any major film from a major studio costs at least $100 million to make.    It&#8217;s the rare still photography shoot that costs more than a few hundred thousand and those are pretty rare.  So what&#8217;s the market besides drooling tech nerds who couldn&#8217;t afford it in 100 years?   And what exactly would they use it for if they could afford it.  A camera like this doesn&#8217;t exactly lend itself to discrete candid shooting.   To me, this camera is the Hummer of photography.</p>
<p>Of course you can upgrade the camera when the &#8220;brain&#8221; costs more than most other full cameras.  The FF Scarlet brain is going to cost $7K (that&#8217;s without viewfinder, power supply, storage, lenses, etc.)   The FF Epic &#8220;brain&#8221; is going to cost $35,000 (without all other stuff.)</p>
<p>Nikon couldn&#8217;t care less&#8230;this is not a market they would ever want to be in.    How many is Red going to sell of these?  50?  100?    </p>
<p>And let&#8217;s take a look at the other sensors.   The 2/3&#8243; sensor is 6.3% the size of full frame.   The S35 sensor is 52% the size of full frame (about 20% larger than DX).   Now the 645 and 617 sensors are impressive, but they&#8217;re just drawings.    And the 617 sensor creates a 261 MP image.   Imagine having to post-process a bunch of those!!</p>
<p>And best of all, this is all vaporware.   None (or virtually none) of it exists.     </p>
<p>My bet is that in this recession, some of this never gets manufactured.</p>
<p>Much ado about nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
