<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon EOS5DmkII &#8211; Sample Video Using Nikkor, Zeiss Lenses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/24/canon-eos5dmkii-sample-video-using-nikkor-zeiss-lenses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/24/canon-eos5dmkii-sample-video-using-nikkor-zeiss-lenses/</link>
	<description>Helping you figure out WTF Nikon&#039;s doing... D700x? D4? Rangefinder?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:40:10 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: scalesusa</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/24/canon-eos5dmkii-sample-video-using-nikkor-zeiss-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-856</link>
		<dc:creator>scalesusa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=852#comment-856</guid>
		<description>The whinning will start soon.  It took a team of pros 12 hours to edit this video in 1080 HD on high end equipment.  Those who think they can use and edit video like a camcorder will be in shock.  Image a RED with even higher resolution, it will take $20,000 computers and $10,000 software to edit efficiently.  Eventually, the price of more powerful software and equipment will drop, but early adapters beware.

There are lots of people out there who can and will put the camera to good use, but many who will buy it for video are unprepared.  At least, the D90 video can be handled by most computers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whinning will start soon.  It took a team of pros 12 hours to edit this video in 1080 HD on high end equipment.  Those who think they can use and edit video like a camcorder will be in shock.  Image a RED with even higher resolution, it will take $20,000 computers and $10,000 software to edit efficiently.  Eventually, the price of more powerful software and equipment will drop, but early adapters beware.</p>
<p>There are lots of people out there who can and will put the camera to good use, but many who will buy it for video are unprepared.  At least, the D90 video can be handled by most computers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhotoGeek</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/24/canon-eos5dmkii-sample-video-using-nikkor-zeiss-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-854</link>
		<dc:creator>PhotoGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=852#comment-854</guid>
		<description>Drool worthy is right, I may not be a fan of the images in comparison to those taken by a Nikon, but the video is definitely worth a gander. I don&#039;t need it in my pro body, but it would be fun in something like a D800. :D 
-peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drool worthy is right, I may not be a fan of the images in comparison to those taken by a Nikon, but the video is definitely worth a gander. I don&#8217;t need it in my pro body, but it would be fun in something like a D800. <img src='http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
-peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

