<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon VL1 &#8211; the 50 Megapixel Rumor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/07/29/nikon-vl1-the-50-megapixel-rumor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/07/29/nikon-vl1-the-50-megapixel-rumor/</link>
	<description>Helping you figure out WTF Nikon&#039;s doing... D700x? D4? Rangefinder?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:35:15 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chagall</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/07/29/nikon-vl1-the-50-megapixel-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-1046</link>
		<dc:creator>Chagall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1225#comment-1046</guid>
		<description>I have to agree.  With all those specs, the camera would be more than $9999.00.  Eventually someone hopefully will make a camera that is not a bulky medium format SLR.  A simple rangefinder that has 3 lenses available would work.

It could be at that magic price of a few pennies under 10k with something like a 16 to 21MP sensor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree.  With all those specs, the camera would be more than $9999.00.  Eventually someone hopefully will make a camera that is not a bulky medium format SLR.  A simple rangefinder that has 3 lenses available would work.</p>
<p>It could be at that magic price of a few pennies under 10k with something like a 16 to 21MP sensor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
