<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nikon Watch &#187; Regular Post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/category/post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com</link>
	<description>Helping you figure out WTF Nikon&#039;s doing... D700x? D4? Rangefinder?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 20:39:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Nikon D3x + 24-74mm Tattoo?</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/10/21/nikon-d3x-24-74mm-tattoo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/10/21/nikon-d3x-24-74mm-tattoo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow- I mean I love the body and lens but this is a bit much. Maybe I could get a tattoo of the 58mm Noct or the F3 body&#8230;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow- I mean I love the body and lens <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/21/enthusiastic-shutterbug-immortalizes-nikon-on-his-forearm/#continued">but this is a bit much</a>. Maybe I could get a tattoo of the 58mm Noct or the F3 body&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/10/21/nikon-d3x-24-74mm-tattoo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon House Cameras in Tokyo (Ginza) Japan</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/10/19/nikon-house-cameras-in-tokyo-ginza-japan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/10/19/nikon-house-cameras-in-tokyo-ginza-japan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 02:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This year&#8217;s big trip ended up being Japan- I went to Kyoto and Tokyo. Kyoto has too many temples and Tokyo&#8217;s got cameras- or at least that&#8217;s how I saw it!
We stayed in  the fashionable Ginza district- you should think of it a lot like Japan&#8217;s version of shopping in Manhattan.
Within easy walking distance of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 410px"><img title="Nikon House- Ginza Tokyo" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/nikonhousesmall.jpg" alt="Nikon House- Ginza Tokyo" width="400" height="359" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon House- Ginza Tokyo</p></div>
<p>This year&#8217;s big trip ended up being Japan- I went to Kyoto and Tokyo. Kyoto has too many temples and Tokyo&#8217;s got cameras- or at least that&#8217;s how I saw it!</p>
<p>We stayed in  the fashionable Ginza district- you should think of it a lot like Japan&#8217;s version of shopping in Manhattan.</p>
<p>Within easy walking distance of the <a href="http://www.daiichihotel-tokyo.com/english/topframe.htm">hotel Dai-Ichi</a> are:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.nikon-image.com/jpn/support/showroom/servicecenter/ginza/eng_index.htm">Nikon Salon and Service Center</a> (google maps)</li>
<li>Nikon House</li>
<li>Leica Boutique</li>
</ul>
<p>I&#8217;ll get into the Nikon Salon in a different post because it actually pales in comparison to what can be found at the <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;source=s_q&amp;hl=en&amp;geocode=&amp;q=%22nikon+house%22+ginza+tokyo+%22sony+building%22&amp;sll=35.671794,139.764345&amp;sspn=0.001323,0.00252&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;hq=%22nikon+house%22+ginza+tokyo+%22sony+building%22&amp;hnear=&amp;ll=35.672466,139.763181&amp;spn=0,359.99748&amp;t=h&amp;z=20&amp;layer=c&amp;cbll=35.67261,139.763344&amp;panoid=-OB6rAE1R58yTszZsZDWqQ&amp;cbp=12,105.49,,0,5.48">Nikon House</a> (google maps).</p>
<p><strong>What&#8217;s There</strong></p>
<p>The most minty collectibles- I saw F3&#8217;s in near-perfect condition. They had all of the range-finders I knew about and every SLR I&#8217;m aware of (excluding whacky variants). For good measure- they&#8217;ve got Leica bodies.</p>
<p>But what blew me away was, I saw <em><strong>two </strong></em>of these:</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 311px"><img title="Nikon House- Nikkor 58mm f/1.2 Noct" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/nikonhouse58mmsmall.jpg" alt="Nikon House- Nikkor 58mm f/1.2 Noct" width="301" height="400" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon House- Nikkor 58mm f/1.2 Noct</p></div>
<p>If you&#8217;re not familiar with the spectacular night photography results this lens achieves, <a href="http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/58.htm">Ken&#8217;s got a good overview</a>, and here is a great article by Nikon about the more technical aspects of the lens&#8217;s lack of sagittal coma flare. Nikon provides a nice example of sagittal coma- compare the <a href="http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/technology/nikkor/img/n16-p1m.jpg">Noct</a> to a <a href="http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/technology/nikkor/img/n16-p2m.jpg">non-Noct</a> and look at how the cars&#8217; brake lights smear into oblong blobs on the non-noct.</p>
<p>Hey, notice that price? That&#8217;s only $3,822 at today&#8217;s terrible exchange rate- but they&#8217;ve been going for ~$3200 the last time I checked on ebay&#8211; IF you can get one and if you&#8217;re spending that much on a 30+ year old lens, do you want to trust some random internet guy? I once saw a person offering -5- of these for sale on Ebay, all in different auctions- all the same seller, same picture, same description. I wrote him asking how he could have <strong>5</strong> for sale and flagged it fraudulent and it was down the next day.</p>
<p>If I could blow the cash, I would have bought it- I may still kick myself for not buying one- I&#8217;ll probably never see one in person again and Nikon will never make one again (it&#8217;s clear due to the dearth new FX primes that they just don&#8217;t care to offer the breadth that they once did- nobody who buys a D5000 is going to buy any&#8230; Get your 200mm f/2 now, is my advice).</p>
<p>Here are some more examples <em>(click to get a much larger version)</em>:</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 410px"><a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/nikonhousef1.png"><img title="Nikon House- Minty F1" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/nikonhousef1single.png" alt="Nikon House- Minty F1" width="400" height="433" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon House- Minty F1</p></div>
<p>If that minty F1 doesn&#8217;t get your heart going, cameras may just not be for you. I think I&#8217;m now kicking myself for not grabbing one of those minty black F1&#8217;s- I&#8217;ll never see another that good probably.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 410px"><a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/nikonhousef3.png"><img title="Nikon House- Minty F3s" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/nikonhousef3small.jpg" alt="Nikon House- Minty F3s" width="400" height="129" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon House- Minty F3&#39;s</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 410px"><a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/nikonhousef5.png"><img title="Nikon House- F5s" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/nikonhousef5small.jpg" alt="Nikon House- F5s" width="400" height="112" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon House- F5&#39;s</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 410px"><a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/nikonhoused200.png"><img title="Nikon House- D200s" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/nikonhoused200small.jpg" alt="Nikon House- D200s" width="400" height="75" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon House- D200&#39;s</p></div>
<p><strong>Prices</strong></p>
<p>If you want to know what your used D200 is going to fetch, be prepared for tears. My F5, that I paid a whole paycheck for in &#8216;98 dollars is now worth even less than I thought. The reality is that the prices were higher than what we can get in the US- but let&#8217;s get serious- the dollar&#8217;s weak, Tokyo real estate is crazy-expensive and how many other places have -2- 58mm f/1.2&#8217;s on hand for you to try out?</p>
<p>They DO take credit card and they&#8217;ll hassle you for a passport- this is because they want to have you avoid paying the 5% Japanese sales tax</p>
<p><strong>Getting There</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;source=s_q&amp;hl=en&amp;geocode=&amp;q=%22nikon+house%22+ginza&amp;sll=35.672302,139.765717&amp;sspn=5.527901,10.321655&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;hq=%22nikon+house%22+ginza&amp;hnear=&amp;ll=35.672533,139.763255&amp;spn=0,359.98992&amp;t=h&amp;z=18&amp;layer=c&amp;cbll=35.67261,139.763344&amp;panoid=-OB6rAE1R58yTszZsZDWqQ&amp;cbp=12,103.69,,0,1.48">Here&#8217;s the exact spot</a>. I highly recommend that you find a map with the Sony Building in Ginza on it- the Ginza Metro had maps with stores on it and so did the street maps and many places are referred to by the building name as opposed to addresses. Closest subway&#8217;s where either Ginza (on the Ginza Line- 1 stop from the Tokyo station), or Shimbashi (like 2 stops from the Tokyo metro).  That&#8217;s all you really need- it&#8217;s Japan, but the area is pretty small, find some map with the Sony Building on it and go there, it&#8217;s across the street.</p>
<p><strong>No Photography! This is a Camera Store!</strong></p>
<p>So I spent some time outside getting establishing shots and marvelling, then I go inside and get some shots of the items in the display case like the F1&#8217;s above and I hear &#8220;NO PHOTO!&#8221; Huh? &#8220;Oh, ok&#8230;&#8221; It&#8217;s a camera store that only uses clear glass- I can take shots of the inside from the outside and the entire outside storefront is one glass display case. I can&#8217;t figure this out- I guess they don&#8217;t want idiots on the internet hassling them for mint collectibles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/10/19/nikon-house-cameras-in-tokyo-ginza-japan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NikonWatch Admin Striken with Post-Latening Flu!</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/10/19/nikonwatch-admin-striken-with-post-latening-flu/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/10/19/nikonwatch-admin-striken-with-post-latening-flu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apologies- as soon as I got back from Japan, I got a flu that put me down for several days. Unfortunately, that didn&#8217;t work well with Nikon&#8217;s release schedule. If I&#8217;ve missed anything, please mail me.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies- as soon as I got back from Japan, I got a flu that put me down for several days. Unfortunately, that didn&#8217;t work well with Nikon&#8217;s release schedule. If I&#8217;ve missed anything, please mail me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/10/19/nikonwatch-admin-striken-with-post-latening-flu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon COOLPIX S1000pj Shipments Delayed to October</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/08/31/nikon-coolpix-s1000pj-shipments-delayed-to-october/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/08/31/nikon-coolpix-s1000pj-shipments-delayed-to-october/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coolpix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S1000pj]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Engadget finds an article on the Japanese Impress site that says that the S1000pj&#8217;s have such strong demand that they are delaying the shipments from September to October:
&#8230;[Demand] significantly exceeded the expected number of orders from the original quantity, [Nikon] can not provide a sufficient number&#8230;
I wonder if that&#8217;s the actual reason though- how are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 390px"><img title="Nikon S1000pjs Delayed" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/s1000pj.jpg" alt="Nikon S1000pjs Delayed" width="380" height="285" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon S1000pj&#39;s Delayed</p></div>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/31/nikon-coolpix-s1000pj-wont-be-with-us-until-october-others-als/">Engadget</a> finds <a title="Nikon S1000pj's Delayed" href="http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&amp;tl=en&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fdc.watch.impress.co.jp%2Fdocs%2Fnews%2F20090831_312053.html%3Fref%3Drss">an article on the Japanese Impress</a> site that says that the S1000pj&#8217;s have such strong demand that they are delaying the shipments from September to October:</p>
<blockquote><p><span onmouseover="_tipon(this)" onmouseout="_tipoff()">&#8230;[Demand] significantly exceeded the expected number of orders from the original quantity, [Nikon] can not provide a sufficient number&#8230;</span></p></blockquote>
<p><strong>I wonder if that&#8217;s the actual reason though</strong>- how are they gauging interest- pre-order channel sales? It would seem to me that you&#8217;d release the initial shipment and then head into round 2- that&#8217;s what we&#8217;ve typically seen with hard to get new items in the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/08/31/nikon-coolpix-s1000pj-shipments-delayed-to-october/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maintenance Over</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/08/15/maintnenace-over/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/08/15/maintnenace-over/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 19:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re now on the latest version of WordPress- this update was made necessary due to a recently found bug that allows really easy pwnage. Remember- always validate user input&#8230;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re now on the latest version of WordPress- this update was made necessary due to a recently found bug that allows really easy pwnage. Remember- always validate user input&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/08/15/maintnenace-over/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Updates Ahoy!</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/08/15/updates-ahoy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/08/15/updates-ahoy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 14:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ll be upgrading this site over the next few days. During that period, you may experience random oddities, crashes, downages, dry mouth, and headaches.
If your problems persist more than a couple days, please see you doctor.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be upgrading this site over the next few days. During that period, you may experience random oddities, crashes, downages, dry mouth, and headaches.</p>
<p>If your problems persist more than a couple days, please see you doctor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/08/15/updates-ahoy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Serial Number Checker Code- Yanked, Prob in IE</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/08/01/serial-number-checker-code-yanked-prob-in-ie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/08/01/serial-number-checker-code-yanked-prob-in-ie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 01:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve had to yank the serial number code post because there&#8217;s some sort of issue with IE where it prevents the right hand side links (and ads!) from being displayed.
Which explains why the few pennies I normally get per day has dropped to -0-. Big brother has not asked me to take it down, let&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had to yank the serial number code post because there&#8217;s some sort of issue with IE where it prevents the right hand side links (and ads!) from being displayed.</p>
<p>Which explains why the few pennies I normally get per day has dropped to -0-. Big brother has not asked me to take it down, let&#8217;s not start a silly rumor.</p>
<p>If you want the code, please mail me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/08/01/serial-number-checker-code-yanked-prob-in-ie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More: D5000 Service Advisory Serial Number Range</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/07/26/more-d5000-service-advisory-serial-number-range/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/07/26/more-d5000-service-advisory-serial-number-range/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 17:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is very early, I haven&#8217;t double-checked these by hand, but here&#8217;s what I have so far.
I&#8217;ve tested increments of 100 from: 3,015,209 to 3,515,500 and here are the results- remember that &#8220;positive&#8221; means your body DOES have the problem, &#8220;negative&#8221; means that it&#8217;s fine. Also, I haven&#8217;t bothered checking numbers except at intervals of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 255px"><img title="D5000 Service Advisory Serial Number Range" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/d5000sad.jpg" alt="D5000 Service Advisory Serial Number Range" width="245" height="184" /><p class="wp-caption-text">D5000 Service Advisory Serial Number Range</p></div>
<p>This is very early, I haven&#8217;t double-checked these by hand, but here&#8217;s what I have so far.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tested increments of 100 from: 3,015,209 to 3,515,500 and here are the results- remember that &#8220;positive&#8221; means your body DOES have the problem, &#8220;negative&#8221; means that it&#8217;s fine. Also, I haven&#8217;t bothered checking numbers except at intervals of 10. For example, 3032295 has the problem, 3032296 does not, but I won&#8217;t bother checking every single number.</p>
<p>3015209 &#8211; 3026100: Positive (has the defect)</p>
<p>3023300: Negative</p>
<p>3023400 &#8211; 3026200: Positive</p>
<p>3026300: Negative</p>
<p>3026400 &#8211; 3029200: Positive</p>
<p>3029300: Negative</p>
<p>3029400 &#8211; 3030000: Positive</p>
<p>3030100 &#8211; 3030200: Negative</p>
<p>3030300 &#8211; 3032200: Positive</p>
<p>3032300: Negative</p>
<p>3032400 &#8211; 3048000: Positive</p>
<p>3048100: Negative</p>
<p>3048200 &#8211; 3054100: Positive</p>
<p>3054200: Negative</p>
<p>3054300 &#8211; 3073600: Positive</p>
<p>3073700: Negative</p>
<p>3073800 &#8211; 3084200: Positive</p>
<p>3084300: Negative</p>
<p>3084400 &#8211; 3085200: Positive</p>
<p>3085300: Negative</p>
<p>3085400 &#8211; 3112300: Positive</p>
<p>3112400: Negative</p>
<p>3112500 &#8211; 3114300: Positive</p>
<p>3114400 &#8211; 3515500 : Negative- End of run?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/07/26/more-d5000-service-advisory-serial-number-range/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D5000 Service Advisory Serial Number Range- Appears to Start at 3,015,209</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/07/26/d5000-service-advisory-serial-number-range-start-at-3015209/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/07/26/d5000-service-advisory-serial-number-range-start-at-3015209/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[service advisory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve done some poking around and the lowest serial number that appears to work is 3,015,209.
If you&#8217;ve got one that&#8217;s lower than this and it works, please mail me, I&#8217;d like to get a complete list.
I do not yet know the upper bound.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 290px"><img title="D5000 Service Advisory Serial Number Ranges- Start at 3,015,209" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/d5000sad.jpg" alt="D5000 Service Advisory Serial Number Ranges- Start at 3,015,209" width="280" height="210" /><p class="wp-caption-text">D5000 Service Advisory Serial Number Ranges- Start at 3,015,209</p></div>
<p>I&#8217;ve done some poking around and the lowest serial number that appears to work is 3,015,209.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve got one that&#8217;s lower than this and it works, please mail me, I&#8217;d like to get a complete list.</p>
<p>I do not yet know the upper bound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/07/26/d5000-service-advisory-serial-number-range-start-at-3015209/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikkor-S 5.8 cm f/1.4 vs. Nikkor AF-S 50 mm f/1.4G Comparison!</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/06/24/nikkor-s-58-cm-f14-vs-nikkor-af-s-50-mm-f14g-comparison/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/06/24/nikkor-s-58-cm-f14-vs-nikkor-af-s-50-mm-f14g-comparison/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is total win- the guys at LensTip have made a detailed comparison between the OLD Nikkor-S 5.8 cm f/1.4 (58mm f/1.4) and the new Nikkor AF-S 50 mm f/1.4G as used on the D3.
What&#8217;s not surprising is that the modern lens is better. What IS surprising is that the ancient lens gets very, very [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 85px"><img title="Nikkor-S 5.8 cm f/1.4 vs. Nikkor AF-S 50 mm f/1.4G" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/lensessmall.jpg" alt="Nikkor-S 5.8 cm f/1.4 vs. Nikkor AF-S 50 mm f/1.4G" width="75" height="128" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikkor-S 5.8 cm f/1.4 vs. Nikkor AF-S 50 mm f/1.4G</p></div>
<p>This is total win- the guys at LensTip have made <a href="http://www.lenstip.com/114.1-article-50_years_of_Nikon_F-mount_%E2%80%93_Nikkor-S_5.8_cm_f_1.4_vs._Nikkor_AF-S_50_mm_f_1.4G_Introduction.html">a detailed comparison between the OLD Nikkor-S 5.8 cm f/1.4 (58mm f/1.4) and the new Nikkor AF-S 50 mm f/1.4G</a> as used on the D3.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s not surprising is that the modern lens is better. What IS surprising is that the ancient lens gets <a href="http://www.lenstip.com/114.4-article-50_years_of_Nikon_F-mount_%E2%80%93_Nikkor-S_5.8_cm_f_1.4_vs._Nikkor_AF-S_50_mm_f_1.4G_Image_resolution.html">very, very close to the new lens&#8217; performance in resolution</a> once you&#8217;re at f/8 or above and that the old lens is <a href="http://www.lenstip.com/114.5-article-50_years_of_Nikon_F-mount_%E2%80%93_Nikkor-S_5.8_cm_f_1.4_vs._Nikkor_AF-S_50_mm_f_1.4G_Chromatic_aberration.html">a good deal better with CA</a>.</p>
<p>Very fascinating article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/06/24/nikkor-s-58-cm-f14-vs-nikkor-af-s-50-mm-f14g-comparison/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>dpReview Reviews the Nikkor 50mm AF-S f/1.4G</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/06/19/dpreview-reviews-the-nikkor-50mm-af-s-f14g/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/06/19/dpreview-reviews-the-nikkor-50mm-af-s-f14g/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dpReview takes a look at Nikon&#8217;s Nikkor 50mm AF-S f/1.4G lens on both DX and FX format and finds it to be largely OK.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 85px"><img title="Nikkor" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/lensessmall.jpg" alt="Nikkor" width="75" height="128" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikkor 50mm AF-S f/1.4G Review</p></div>
<p>dpReview <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/nikon_50_1p4g_n15/">takes a look at Nikon&#8217;s Nikkor 50mm AF-S f/1.4G lens</a> on both DX and FX format and finds it to be largely OK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/06/19/dpreview-reviews-the-nikkor-50mm-af-s-f14g/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>dpReview&#8217;s 30+ Page Nikon D5000 SLR Overview</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/06/12/dpreviews-30-page-nikon-d5000-slr-overview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/06/12/dpreviews-30-page-nikon-d5000-slr-overview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re dying for more a more in-depth look at the D5000, then dpReview has a 30+ page look at it.
The best part may be on the front page where there&#8217;s a comparison matrix between the D500, D90, and D60. Most of the other info is just a rundown of the features and specs, menus, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 410px"><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond5000/"><img title="Nikon D5000 SLR Review" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/d5000real.jpg" alt="Nikon D5000 SLR Review" width="400" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon D5000 SLR Review</p></div>
<p>If you&#8217;re dying for more a more in-depth look at the D5000, then <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond5000/">dpReview has a 30+ page look at it</a>.</p>
<p>The best part may be on the front page where there&#8217;s a comparison matrix between the D500, D90, and D60. Most of the other info is just a rundown of the features and specs, menus, product shots, and a bunch of sample shots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/06/12/dpreviews-30-page-nikon-d5000-slr-overview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SB-600 Broken Flash Tube Replacement</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/06/01/sb-600-broken-flassh-tube-replacement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/06/01/sb-600-broken-flassh-tube-replacement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 01:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flashes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve saw the previous post on replacing your SB-800&#8217;s melted fresnel lens and pointed me to this link that shows you how to replace the busted flash tube on your SB-600, if you&#8217;re handy with a soldering iron.
Sadly, the only thing I can do with soldering irons is burn things and make nice round beads [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 85px"><img title="Nikon SB-600 Fresnel Lens Replacement" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/flashessmall.jpg" alt="Nikon SB-600 Fresnel Lens Replacement" width="75" height="128" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon SB-600 Flash Tube Replacement</p></div>
<p>Steve saw the previous post on replacing your SB-800&#8217;s melted fresnel lens and pointed me to this <a href="http://photorojo.blogspot.com/2009/05/diy-nikon-sb-600-speedlight-flash-tube.html">link that shows you how to replace the busted flash tube on your SB-600</a>, if you&#8217;re handy with a soldering iron.</p>
<p>Sadly, the only thing I can do with soldering irons is burn things and make nice round beads of solder- which I enjoy, but it&#8217;s not very productive.</p>
<p>Kudos to Steve, nicely done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/06/01/sb-600-broken-flassh-tube-replacement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D90 and D5000 Videos</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/05/30/nikon-d90-and-d5000-videos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/05/30/nikon-d90-and-d5000-videos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 17:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d5000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d90]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike Kobal continues to impress with his movies taken with the D90 and now D5000. He&#8217;s good enough that I&#8217;m starting to wonder why he bothers with cameras and doesn&#8217;t just get a dedicated video camera.
Take a look.

SILENTIUM EST AUREUM Nikon D90 + Lensbaby from Mike Kobal on Vimeo.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mikekobal.com/blog/">Mike Kobal continues to impress with his movies</a> taken with the D90 and now D5000. He&#8217;s good enough that I&#8217;m starting to wonder why he bothers with cameras and doesn&#8217;t just get a dedicated video camera.</p>
<p>Take a look.<br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="400" height="225" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=4899568&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=ffffff&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="225" src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=4899568&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=ffffff&amp;fullscreen=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/4899568">SILENTIUM EST AUREUM Nikon D90 + Lensbaby</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/user958381">Mike Kobal</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/05/30/nikon-d90-and-d5000-videos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Repairing the Melted Lens on the Front of Your Nikon SB-800</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/05/27/repairing-the-melted-lens-on-the-front-of-your-nikon-sb-800/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/05/27/repairing-the-melted-lens-on-the-front-of-your-nikon-sb-800/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 10:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flashes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Son Ton melted the front fresnel lens on his Nikon SB-800 flash.
Not being the pussy that you and I are, I mean, uh, being more manly than me and my fist full of Craftsman screwdrivers, he decided to tackle the repair himself.
Check out his site for very interesting shots of the repair in action- normally, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 85px"><img title="Replace Melted Nikon SB-800 Front Lens" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/flashessmall.jpg" alt="Replace Melted Nikon SB-800 Front Lens" width="75" height="128" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Replace Melted Nikon SB-800 Front Lens</p></div>
<p>Son Ton melted the front fresnel lens on his Nikon SB-800 flash.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">Not being the pussy that you and I are,</span> I mean, uh, being more manly than me and my fist full of Craftsman screwdrivers, he decided to tackle the repair himself.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.i2istudios.com/journal/2007/11/10/gear/replacing-the-fresnel-on-my-melted-nikon-sb-800/">Check out his site for very interesting shots of the repair in action</a>- normally, you only get to see these parts if you destroy your SB-800, so my hat&#8217;s off to him.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 410px"><a href="http://www.i2istudios.com/journal/2007/11/10/gear/replacing-the-fresnel-on-my-melted-nikon-sb-800/"><img title="Front Fresnel Repair of Nikon SB-800" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/sb800repair.jpg" alt="Front Fresnel Repair of Nikon SB-800" width="400" height="274" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Front Fresnel Repair of Nikon SB-800</p></div>
<p>Almost even more interesting is that he somehow was able to dig up the exploded parts diagram for the SB-800:</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 410px"><a title="Repairing the Melted Lens on the Front of Your Nikon SB-800" href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/sb800partsdiagram.jpg"><img title="Nikon SB-800 Exploded Parts Diagram" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/sb800partsdiagramsmall.jpg" alt="Nikon SB-800 Exploded Parts Diagram" width="400" height="290" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon SB-800 Exploded Parts Diagram (Click to enlarge)</p></div>
<p>Kudos again to Son Ton!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/05/27/repairing-the-melted-lens-on-the-front-of-your-nikon-sb-800/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sample Shots from the Nikon Nikkor 10-24mm AF-S f/3.5-4.5G DX ED</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/05/18/sample-shots-from-the-nikon-nikkor-10-24mm-af-s-f35-45g-dx-ed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/05/18/sample-shots-from-the-nikon-nikkor-10-24mm-af-s-f35-45g-dx-ed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 00:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10-24]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TBower (flickr) has managed to get ahold of the lens and posted some sample shots taken with Nikon&#8217;s Nikkor 10-24mm AF-S f/3.5-4.5G DX ED and here.
CA and fringing appear to be bad as shown here. Even the central image area appears to lack detail to me- maybe his technique wasn&#8217;t so hot?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 85px"><img title="Review of the Nikon 10-24mm AF-S Nikkor f/3.5-4.5G DX ED" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/lensessmall.jpg" alt="Review of the Nikon 10-24mm AF-S Nikkor f/3.5-4.5G DX ED" width="75" height="128" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Sample Shots:Nikon 10-24mm AF-S Nikkor f/3.5-4.5G DX ED</p></div>
<p>TBower (flickr) has managed to get ahold of the lens and posted <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/zuikosan/sets/72157617998661840/">some sample shots</a> taken with Nikon&#8217;s Nikkor 10-24mm AF-S f/3.5-4.5G DX ED and <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/zuikosan/sets/72157618270411522/">here</a>.</p>
<p>CA and fringing appear to be bad as <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/zuikosan/3536610608/sizes/o/in/set-72157618270411522/">shown here</a>. Even the central image area appears to lack detail to me- maybe his technique wasn&#8217;t so hot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/05/18/sample-shots-from-the-nikon-nikkor-10-24mm-af-s-f35-45g-dx-ed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ken &#8220;Reviews&#8221; Nikon&#8217;s Nikkor 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G DX ED Lens</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/05/18/ken-reviews-nikons-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-dx-ed-lense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/05/18/ken-reviews-nikons-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-dx-ed-lense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 00:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10-24mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ken has a funny deal- he gives reviews to Nikon items that he either hasn&#8217;t held in his hands before, or as it appears in this case, he&#8217;s taken one shot outside of an office complex with!
But if you must know what he&#8217;s got to say, then take a look.
Basically, he says it&#8217;s better than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 85px"><img title="Review of the Nikon 10-24mm AF-S Nikkor f/3.5-4.5G DX ED" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/lensessmall.jpg" alt="Review of the Nikon 10-24mm AF-S Nikkor f/3.5-4.5G DX ED" width="75" height="128" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon 10-24mm AF-S Nikkor f/3.5-4.5G DX ED</p></div>
<p>Ken has a funny deal- he gives reviews to Nikon items that he either hasn&#8217;t held in his hands before, or as it appears in this case, he&#8217;s taken one shot outside of an office complex with!</p>
<p>But if you must know what he&#8217;s got to say, then <a href="http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/10-24mm.htm">take a look</a>.</p>
<p>Basically, he says it&#8217;s better than the 12-24mm.</p>
<p>Either I&#8217;m missing something (hey, could be)- or the 12-24mm is going to go bye-bye. They&#8217;re basically similar lenses in every way that I can see. The question is &#8220;why&#8221;- why did Nikon release two lenses that compete against each other in almost every way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/05/18/ken-reviews-nikons-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-dx-ed-lense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D5000 Decent Sample Shots and ISO Comparisons</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/04/30/d5000-decent-sample-shots-and-iso-comparisons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/04/30/d5000-decent-sample-shots-and-iso-comparisons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 22:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[18-55mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d5000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Japanese website dcWatch has a nice review of the D5000 and 18-55mm kit lens (translated) that includes studio and outdoor comparison shots are various ISO and noise reduction levels.
Unsurprisingly, everything looks pretty good.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 330px"><a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?prev=hp&amp;hl=en&amp;js=n&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fdc.watch.impress.co.jp%2Fcda%2Freview%2F2009%2F04%2F28%2F10765.html&amp;sl=ja&amp;tl=en"><img title="Nikon D5000 18-55mm Sample Shot @ 6400iso" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/d5000redbus6400iso.jpg" alt="Nikon D5000 18-55mm Sample Shot @ 6400iso" width="320" height="213" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon D5000 18-55mm Sample Shot @ 6400iso</p></div>
<p>The Japanese website <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?prev=hp&amp;hl=en&amp;js=n&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fdc.watch.impress.co.jp%2Fcda%2Freview%2F2009%2F04%2F28%2F10765.html&amp;sl=ja&amp;tl=en">dcWatch has a nice review of the D5000 and 18-55mm kit lens</a> (translated) that includes studio and outdoor comparison shots are various ISO and noise reduction levels.</p>
<p>Unsurprisingly, everything looks pretty good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/04/30/d5000-decent-sample-shots-and-iso-comparisons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Engadget Compares D5000 and D90</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/04/30/engadget-compares-d5000-and-d90/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/04/30/engadget-compares-d5000-and-d90/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Engadget&#8217;s just all over the mid-level camera market lately. In this article, they compare the D90 and D5000.
It&#8217;s hard to compare the quality from their images. The D5000 comparison shots are underexposed and at slightly different magnifications, so you can&#8217;t really conclude anything from those shots.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Engadget&#8217;s just all over the mid-level camera market lately. In this article, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/28/nikon-d5000-review-head-to-head-with-d90/">they compare the D90 and D5000</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to compare the quality from their images. The D5000 comparison shots are underexposed and at slightly different magnifications, so you can&#8217;t really conclude anything from those shots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/04/30/engadget-compares-d5000-and-d90/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Engadget: Canon EOS Rebel T1i vs. Nikon D5000&#8230; fight!</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/04/30/engadget-canon-eos-rebel-t1i-vs-nikon-d5000-fight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/04/30/engadget-canon-eos-rebel-t1i-vs-nikon-d5000-fight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d5000]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Engadget has a quick head to head with the T1i and the D5000: they seem pretty well matched in general.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Engadget has a quick <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/29/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-vs-nikon-d5000-fight/">head to head with the T1i and the D5000</a>: they seem pretty well matched in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/04/30/engadget-canon-eos-rebel-t1i-vs-nikon-d5000-fight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Engadget Has D5000 Unboxed Shots</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/04/28/engadget-has-d5000-unboxed-shots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/04/28/engadget-has-d5000-unboxed-shots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Engadget site takes a look at the unboxed D5000.
It doesn&#8217;t really say much, but take a look at how the screen can be articulated.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Engadget site takes a look at the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/nikon-d5000-hands-on/">unboxed D5000</a>.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t really say much, but <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/nikon-d5000-hands-on/1520700/">take</a> a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/nikon-d5000-hands-on/1520667/">look</a> at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/nikon-d5000-hands-on/1520664/">how the screen can be articulated</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/04/28/engadget-has-d5000-unboxed-shots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D5000 Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-reviews/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-reviews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PhotographyBlog has a quick hands-on review here and dpReview also has a general overview (the same stuff you find in the press release) and sample images.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PhotographyBlog has a <a href="http://www.photographyblog.com/news/nikon_d5000_hands-on/">quick hands-on review here</a> and dpReview also has a general overview (the same stuff you find in the press release) and <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0904/09041402nikond5000.asp">sample images</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-reviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ritz- Chapter 11 Ago-go</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/04/03/ritz-chapter-11-ago-go/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/04/03/ritz-chapter-11-ago-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 18:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ritz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You guys in Beverly Hills will just have to find another camera store- Ritz is closing 300 stores, unless you&#8217;re in need of some retail shelving and counters:
Retail inventory valued at more than $50 million will be liquidated at        the stores that are being closed. Store closing sales [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys in Beverly Hills will just have to find another camera store- <a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090402006348&amp;newsLang=en">Ritz is closing 300 stores</a>, unless you&#8217;re in need of some retail shelving and counters:</p>
<blockquote><p>Retail inventory valued at more than $50 million will be liquidated at        the stores that are being closed. Store closing sales offering        <strong>substantial discounts on all inventory at those locations will begin on        Saturday, April 4</strong>, and are expected to continue until <strong>everything is sold        to the bare walls</strong>.</p></blockquote>
<p>If you&#8217;d like the list of closing stores, <a href="http://mms.businesswire.com/bwapps/mediaserver/ViewMedia?mgid=178358&amp;vid=1&amp;download=1">you can get it here</a>. California appears to be hit large, mainly in the beach towns, 2/4 locations in my area are going down, Florida looks like it&#8217;s getting hit hard, Minnesota has a high count, and Texas also has a large number going down.</p>
<p>As <a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/27/ritz-camera-chapter-11-bankruptcy-restructuring/">I&#8217;ve written before</a>, I shed no tears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/04/03/ritz-chapter-11-ago-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PMA 2009- Rumors that Flew, then Crashed, Now Just Debris</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/03/07/pma-2009-rumors-that-flew-then-crashed-now-just-debris/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/03/07/pma-2009-rumors-that-flew-then-crashed-now-just-debris/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 03:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You don&#8217;t mind if I engage in a little childish pointing and laughing, do you?
There were lots of sites predicting lots of Nikon goodies to be announced at PMA 2009.
The biggest ones were:

D700x
D770
D400
D5000

Then we had a wad of lenses supposedly coming:

Nikkor AF-S VR-II 200mm f1.8D
Nikkor AF-S VR-II 300mm f2D
Nikkor AF-S VR-II 400mm f2.5D
Nikkor AF-S VR-II [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 410px"><img title="PMA 2009 Dead Nikon Rumors" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/nelson.jpg" alt="PMA 2009 Dead Nikon Rumors" width="400" height="373" /><p class="wp-caption-text">PMA 2009 Dead Nikon Rumors</p></div>
<p>You don&#8217;t mind if I engage in a little childish pointing and laughing, do you?</p>
<p>There were lots of sites predicting lots of Nikon goodies to be announced at PMA 2009.</p>
<p>The biggest ones were:</p>
<ul>
<li>D700x</li>
<li>D770</li>
<li>D400</li>
<li>D5000</li>
</ul>
<p>Then we had a wad of lenses supposedly coming:</p>
<ul>
<li>Nikkor AF-S VR-II 200mm f1.8D</li>
<li>Nikkor AF-S VR-II 300mm f2D</li>
<li>Nikkor AF-S VR-II 400mm f2.5D</li>
<li>Nikkor AF-S VR-II 70-200mm f2.5D</li>
</ul>
<p>Quotes from various well-known sites:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;&#8230;potential release of the D700x next week, but I think those are just opinions of famous online personalities. I have not received a single tip for D700x and<strong> I will stay with my previous selection: D5000 + D400 (the D400 may be released after PMA, but before July 2009). At that point I will have to drop the D5000 next week release probability to 75%</strong> &#8211; so far I have received info from only one source.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I believe that I saw a quote that put this same site saying that the D5000 was a 95% chance.</p>
<p>Another site with a much better reputation wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>It is <strong>almost a certainty that we will see new lenses</strong> from Nikon at PMA.</p></blockquote>
<p>So why am I pointing this out other than to toot my own horn? To remind you that this site is a service to you- dedicated to trying to figure out what Nikon&#8217;s doing- that doesn&#8217;t mean repeated every stupid, idiotic rumor that I can find- that&#8217;s just pointless- just reporting on some of them <img src='http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>If something&#8217;s just unlikely to be true, at worst, I&#8217;ll point it out and call it unlikely, but a lot of times, I will just pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/03/07/pma-2009-rumors-that-flew-then-crashed-now-just-debris/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PMA &#8211; What Have We Got? Wet Matches.</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/03/04/pma-what-have-we-got-wet-matches/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/03/04/pma-what-have-we-got-wet-matches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 02:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Basically nothing, nada, zip.
A 50 years of F-mount logo and some PR blather about the 35mm DX.
Ah well. My digital F3 will have to wait, I guess.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 410px"><img title="Nikon PMA 2009 - Wet Matches" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/wetmatches.jpg" alt="Nikon PMA 2009 - Wet Matches" width="400" height="221" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon PMA 2009 - Wet Matches</p></div>
<p>Basically nothing, nada, zip.</p>
<p>A 50 years of F-mount logo and some PR blather about the 35mm DX.</p>
<p>Ah well. My digital F3 will have to wait, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/03/04/pma-what-have-we-got-wet-matches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon Japan- Price-hike April 17th</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/03/02/nikon-japan-price-hike-april-17th/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/03/02/nikon-japan-price-hike-april-17th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 02:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zachary on dpReview reports that the Japanese are seeing their prices raised too:

There have been lots of threads recently about Nikon price increases, and people have blamed exchange rates. Now, however, there are Nikon price increases in Japan, too. I went to my local camera store here in Kyoto today and there were signs up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 188px"><img title="Nikon Japan- Price-hike April 17th" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/amazing114.jpg" alt="Nikon Japan- Price-hike April 17th" width="178" height="255" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon Japan- Price-hike April 17th</p></div>
<p><a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1030&amp;thread=31169405">Zachary on dpReview reports </a>that the Japanese are seeing their prices raised too:</p>
<blockquote>
<p class="justify">There have been lots of threads recently about Nikon price increases, and people have blamed exchange rates. Now, however, there are Nikon price increases in Japan, too. <strong>I went to my local camera store here in Kyoto today and there were signs up saying all new Nikon products would become more expensive on April 17</strong>. When I asked, they said they had been <em>informed by Nikon</em> this was the case.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Well this is pretty strange actually, I&#8217;m better Nikon will see even worse losses next quarter- raising prices right now is probably not a winning strategy.</p>
<p>Guess we&#8217;ll find out. Beyond their quarterly filings- <strong>when we start seeing pricing gimmicks like mail-in or instant rebates, you can take that as a sign that they know they&#8217;ve priced things too high</strong> and are hurting more than they expected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/03/02/nikon-japan-price-hike-april-17th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Nikon Non-Bayer Sensor Patent (2005)</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/03/02/another-nikon-non-bayer-sensor-patent-2005/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/03/02/another-nikon-non-bayer-sensor-patent-2005/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 02:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anonymous points me to another article by the same guy who found the last patent.
The patent details a non-Bayer sensor which dispenses with the second green pixel in favor of one that senses between red/green or blue/green as a method of increasing dynamic range.
Filed in 2005, I can&#8217;t determine when it was accepted- but we&#8217;ve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 186px"><img title="Nikon Non-Bayer Sensor Patent" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/nikonlogosmall.jpg" alt="Nikon Non-Bayer Sensor Patent" width="176" height="176" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon Non-Bayer Sensor Patent</p></div>
<p>Anonymous points me to another article by the <a href="http://www.creativemayhem.com.au/?p=236">same guy who found the last patent</a>.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.google.com/patents?id=iPmTAAAAEBAJ&amp;dq=nikon+color+image+sensor+%22color+filter+array%22">patent details a non-Bayer sensor</a> which dispenses with the second green pixel in favor of one that senses between red/green or blue/green as a method of increasing dynamic range.</p>
<p>Filed in 2005, I can&#8217;t determine when it was accepted- but we&#8217;ve seen these things before I can&#8217;t imagine Nikon launching a major new sensor anytime soon- with the market what it is. Also the last sensor was said to be used in to the metering/whitebalance sensors, so we could be looking at a very limited-use situation again.</p>
<p>Thanks, Anonymous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/03/02/another-nikon-non-bayer-sensor-patent-2005/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh Hell! Epson R-D1x Digital Rangefinder- Japan Release Only?</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/28/oh-hell-epson-r-d1x-digital-rangefinder-japan-release-only/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/28/oh-hell-epson-r-d1x-digital-rangefinder-japan-release-only/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dpReview is reporting that Epson UK is saying the Epson R-D1x digital m-mount rangefinder is a Japanese release only.
Wonder if the software will have an english translation&#8230; otherwise, it might be hard to get the damned raw files converted the way you want- or always use jpg. But this also might mean that the menus [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dpReview is reporting that Epson UK is saying the Epson R-D1x digital m-mount rangefinder is a Japanese release only.</p>
<p>Wonder if the software will have an english translation&#8230; otherwise, it might be hard to get the damned raw files converted the way you want- or always use jpg. But this also might mean that the menus are in Japanese&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/28/oh-hell-epson-r-d1x-digital-rangefinder-japan-release-only/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Epson R-D1xG Rangefinder!</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/28/epson-r-d1xg-rangefinder/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/28/epson-r-d1xg-rangefinder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Rangefinder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Epson has announced that they&#8217;re going to update their Leica-mount digital rangefinder!
As a piece of mechanical art, these things are Monets, I just can&#8217;t help being charmed by the wonderfully beguiling analog top-plate dials:
Here&#8217;s the main site that&#8217;s got all the details in Japanese.
If, like me, you can&#8217;t afford that Leica M8, this might be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 191px"><img title="Epson Digital Rangefinder Analog Dial" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/epsondial2.jpg" alt="Epson Digital Rangefinder Analog Dial" width="181" height="135" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Epson Digital Rangefinder Analog Dial</p></div>
<p>Epson has announced that they&#8217;re <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&amp;sl=auto&amp;tl=en&amp;u=http://www.epson.jp/osirase/2009/090227.htm">going to update their Leica-mount digital rangefinder!</a></p>
<p>As <a href="http://74.125.95.132/translate_c?hl=en&amp;sl=auto&amp;tl=en&amp;u=http://www.epson.jp/products/colorio/photoviewer_digitalcamera/rd1xg/mechanix.htm&amp;usg=ALkJrhiyEn1JkjNry3IGzm35LBZyMMBjGw#dist4">a piece of mechanical art</a>, these things are Monets, I just can&#8217;t help being charmed by the wonderfully beguiling analog top-plate dials:</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 191px"><img title="Epson Digital Rangefinder Analog Dial" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/epsondial1.jpg" alt="Epson Digital Rangefinder Analog Dial" width="181" height="135" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Epson Digital Rangefinder Analog Dial</p></div>
<p>Here&#8217;s the main site that&#8217;s <a href="http://74.125.95.132/translate_c?hl=en&amp;sl=auto&amp;tl=en&amp;u=http://www.epson.jp/products/colorio/photoviewer_digitalcamera/rd1xg/&amp;usg=ALkJrhgIivN-lzZKGDykfHQpRUFPkOQTew">got all the details in Japanese</a>.</p>
<p>If, like me, you can&#8217;t afford that Leica M8, this might be just the ticket. <a href="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?forumid=48">Visit the guys at the RangeFinder forums for more info</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/28/epson-r-d1xg-rangefinder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ritz Camera- Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Restructuring</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/27/ritz-camera-chapter-11-bankruptcy-restructuring/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/27/ritz-camera-chapter-11-bankruptcy-restructuring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ritz Camera ne Wolf Photo ne Boater&#8217;s World ne Ritz Interactive has filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy restructuring:
&#8230;Ritz Camera Centers Inc., the largest camera-store chain in the U.S., won court approval for $85 million in financing from its existing secured lenders while it reorganizes.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Mary Walrath in Wilmington, Del., authorized the so-called debtor-in-possession [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ritz Camera ne Wolf Photo ne Boater&#8217;s World ne Ritz Interactive <a href="http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&amp;q=Ritz+Camera+Centers+chapter+11&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;ei=PSuoSae-GJC-nQfB0unmDw&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=news_result&amp;resnum=1&amp;ct=title">has filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy restructuring</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;Ritz Camera Centers Inc., the largest camera-store chain in the U.S., won court approval for $85 million in financing from its existing secured lenders while it reorganizes.</p>
<p class="News">U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Mary Walrath in Wilmington, Del., authorized the so-called debtor-in-possession financing on an interim basis&#8230;.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>But have received $85 in financing to help it remain a going concern.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s really hard for me to cry for them- I first encountered them when they bought up the best mom and pop camera store in my area 10 years ago and their product range went from good to amateur. Then I moved to a different stat- where they soon bought out the best pro shop in the area and the second best pro shop.</p>
<p>Then I started to buy everything from <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?KW=BANNER1&amp;img=fire.gif">B&amp;H Photo Video</a>.</p>
<p>The <strong>last time I walked into a Ritz</strong> was about a year ago to buy a D3- they had no waiting list and wouldn&#8217;t take my name, but <strong>one of the employees said that they had 2 on order for him so that he could turn around and sell them as soon as they came in</strong>.</p>
<p>I had a similarily unpleasant situation with RitzCamera.com.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t need these guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/27/ritz-camera-chapter-11-bankruptcy-restructuring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Camera Pr0n: The Ever-Lovely F3</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/16/camera-pr0n-the-ever-lovely-f3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/16/camera-pr0n-the-ever-lovely-f3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 01:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pr0n]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, remember the DeLorean from Back to the Future? DeLoreans have a really cool design.

Did you know that the DeLorean and F3, F4, F5, F6, and the D3 were designed by the same person? Yup- an Italian designed named Giorgetto Giugiaro.
I paid homage to his design tonight (I don&#8217;t need any C&#38;C please, I know [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, remember the DeLorean from Back to the Future? DeLoreans have a really cool design.<br />
<img class="aligncenter" title="DeLorean from Back to the Future" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/backtothefuture.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="264" /></p>
<p>Did you know that the DeLorean and F3, F4, F5, F6, and the D3 were designed by the same person? Yup- an Italian designed named <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giorgetto_Giugiaro">Giorgetto Giugiaro</a>.</p>
<p>I paid homage to his design tonight (I don&#8217;t need any C&amp;C please, I know I&#8217;m no product photographer&#8230;what should I do with the camera strap lugs though?) with my D3 and the macro flashes. The design of the F3 really thrills me, it&#8217;s really a wonderful machine.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 410px"><a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/f3.jpg"><img title="Nikon F3" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/f3small.jpg" alt="Nikon F3" width="400" height="270" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon F3 (Click to enlarge)</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/16/camera-pr0n-the-ever-lovely-f3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PocketWizard Puts Out New Models, Strobist Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/16/pocketwizard-puts-out-new-models-strobist-reviews/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/16/pocketwizard-puts-out-new-models-strobist-reviews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lighting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I bought some PocketWizard radio strobe triggers recently and was surprised that the prices were way down since they were being discounted. I should have immediately though, &#8220;Reducing inventory&#8211; new models on the way.&#8221;
Oh well- I got some decent prices and I ended up not buying everything I wanted. Well word comes today from the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought some PocketWizard radio strobe triggers recently and was surprised that the prices were way down since they were being discounted. I should have immediately though, &#8220;Reducing inventory&#8211; new models on the way.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh well- I got some decent prices and I ended up not buying everything I wanted. Well word comes today from the Strobist (you MUST <a href="http://strobist.blogspot.com/">read his site on flashes</a>) that <a href="http://strobist.blogspot.com/2009/02/pocketwizard-flextt5-and-minitt1-full.html">PocketWizard is introducing new, smaller models with added features</a>.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, they&#8217;re Canon only for the moment, with Nikon variants to follow.</p>
<blockquote><p><span class="fullpost">Both units have pass-through, <strong>full TTL contacts in a hot shoe format</strong>. Which means no more PC cords needed for hooking them up to speedlights. </span></p></blockquote>
<p>Oh thank God! Last night, I had to both hook up the su-800 AND use the PC-Sync to get what I wanted. This would have allowed me to eliminate the use of those really flaky PC cables.</p>
<blockquote><p><span class="fullpost">Okay, may as well start with the headline feature: <strong>They do remote TTL, and they do it well.</strong> They call it &#8220;ControlTL,&#8221; and it is technologically very different than the way the RadioPopper handles remote TTL.</span></p></blockquote>
<p>The PW&#8217;s can now be configured via USB to do some interesting things:</p>
<blockquote><p><span class="fullpost">Well, the new PWs &#8220;know things,&#8221; too. Remember how they can replicate the whole light-based wireless TTL operations by jumping the signal timing on the camera-to-flash pre-chatter? Well, what else could you do if you knew the camera was <em>about</em> to fire your flash?</span></p>
<p>You could tell the flash to fire a little smidge early, is what you could do. And if you could vary the timing on that signal, <strong>you could squeeze an extra stop of shutter speed</strong> out of most cameras&#8217; sync, too.</p></blockquote>
<p>Watch their demo:<br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="320" height="265" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/831L0RvFd2Y&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;color2=0xfebd01" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="320" height="265" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/831L0RvFd2Y&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;color2=0xfebd01" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">No, there is no pricing information availabe- damn I hate it when companies announce products and no pricing.</span></p>
<p>199 for the MiniTT1, $219 for the FlexTT5</p>
<p>Nice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/16/pocketwizard-puts-out-new-models-strobist-reviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh Noes! Fake Chuck West Blog Gets Takedown Notice</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/16/oh-noes-fake-chuck-west-blog-gets-takedown-notice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/16/oh-noes-fake-chuck-west-blog-gets-takedown-notice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What happens when a company has a dedicated, loyal fanbase who yearn for information and virtually none is forthcoming? Right- they go out of their way to speculate, make it up, and overblow the slightest little hints.
So it shouldn&#8217;t be surprising when pointless blogs open up and start filling in the information the companies won&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 185px"><img title="Fake Canon Blogs Get Takedown Notice" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/lawyer2.jpg" alt="Fake Canon Blogs Get Takedown Notice" width="175" height="324" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Fake Canon Blogs Get Takedown Notice</p></div>
<p>What happens when a company has a dedicated, loyal fanbase who yearn for information and virtually none is forthcoming? Right- they go out of their way to speculate, make it up, and overblow the slightest little hints.</p>
<p>So it shouldn&#8217;t be surprising when <a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com">pointless blogs</a> open up and <a href="http://fakechuckwestfall.wordpress.com/2009/02/14/shut-down-notice-from-canon/">start filling in the information the companies</a> won&#8217;t tell us.</p>
<p>On occasion, it&#8217;s taken too far though, and <a href="http://fakechuckwestfall.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/982873542.pdf">the companies object</a>. Well one of the Canon guys took it a bit too far and has been reprimanded for by it several high-priced, humorless lawyers.</p>
<p>This is a shame all around- it&#8217;s up to the speculators to try and not take it too far and it&#8217;s up the companies to put enough info in the pipeline to keep everyone appraised of what&#8217;s happening. It&#8217;s become a whole different world over the last few years- it&#8217;s no longer just a few people in a local camera club gossiping and if the companies don&#8217;t like what they&#8217;re seeing, they should simply give us official information and sites that speculate and put out rumors will simply cease to be appealing.</p>
<p>And hey, what a good time to remind everyone that <strong>NikonWatch has no official relation to Nikon Corp or subsidiaries and has not been approved by them. The Nikon Watch logo is a parody of the official Nikon logo.</strong></p>
<p>Every attempt has been made to ensure that NikonWatch is not confused with Nikon itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/16/oh-noes-fake-chuck-west-blog-gets-takedown-notice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon Talks! Comments On the Nikkor 35mm AF-S F/1.8G DX</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/15/nikon-talks-comments-on-the-nikkor-35mm-af-s-f18g-dx/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/15/nikon-talks-comments-on-the-nikkor-35mm-af-s-f18g-dx/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Hats off to DPreview for getting someone to talk on the record about this lens.
Robert Cristina, Manager of professional products, Europe and Ludovic Drean, Product Manager for lenses, Europe talked to DPreview:
&#8230;The concept was to give a 50mm equivalent lens on the DX format. A lot of people have bought the 50 1.8 because [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" title="Nikon Talks Nikkor 35mm AF-S f/1.8G DX" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/lensessmall.jpg" alt="" width="75" height="128" /> Hats off to<a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0902/09021002nikoninterview.asp"> DPreview for getting someone to talk on the record</a> about this lens.</p>
<p>Robert Cristina, Manager of professional products, Europe and Ludovic Drean, Product Manager for lenses, Europe talked to DPreview:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;The <strong>concept was to give a 50mm equivalent lens on the DX format.</strong> A lot of people have bought the 50 1.8 because it was all that was available. <strong>It may seem rather late for the APS-C system</strong>, but we believed that entry-level users wanted a standard lens&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s about price, size and weight. We wanted this to be a lens for the entry-level.<strong> If we&#8217;d tried to make an FX 35mm F1.4 it might cost €1400, rather than €200&#8230;</strong> The main target is <strong>D40/D60/D90 owners. They make up 80% of our DSLR sales.</strong>..</p></blockquote>
<p>Ok, I&#8217;m waiting for the expensive FX-sized f/1.4 for ~$1,499usd.</p>
<p>Click the link to read the entire thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/15/nikon-talks-comments-on-the-nikkor-35mm-af-s-f18g-dx/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DPreview posts Nikkor 35mm AF-S f/1.8G Samples</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/13/dpreview-posts-nikkor-35mm-af-s-f18g-samples/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/13/dpreview-posts-nikkor-35mm-af-s-f18g-samples/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DPreview has posted some sample shots taken with the new Nikkor 35mm AF-S f/1.8G here.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 85px"><img title="Nikon 35mm AF-S f/1.8G Samples" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/lensessmall.jpg" alt="Nikon 35mm AF-S f/1.8G Samples" width="75" height="128" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon 35mm AF-S f/1.8G Samples</p></div>
<p>DPreview has posted some sample shots taken with the <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0902/09021301nikon35mmsamples.asp">new Nikkor 35mm AF-S f/1.8G here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/13/dpreview-posts-nikkor-35mm-af-s-f18g-samples/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Random Japanese Guy Shows 35mm AF-S f/1.8G on FX</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/12/random-japanese-guy-shows-35mm-af-s-f18g-on-fx/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/12/random-japanese-guy-shows-35mm-af-s-f18g-on-fx/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some random Japanese guy was in his local camera ginza (I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;m using the term incorrectly) and slapped the DX lens on his FX camera to show us what it looked like.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 85px"><img title="35mm AF-S f/1.8G on FX" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/lensessmall.jpg" alt="35mm AF-S f/1.8G on FX" width="75" height="128" /><p class="wp-caption-text">35mm AF-S f/1.8G on FX</p></div>
<p>Some random Japanese guy was in his local camera ginza (I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;m using the term incorrectly) and slapped the <a href="http://blog.goo.ne.jp/takany_/e/48e460ad1f9af00eead7ce336b6d4faf">DX lens on his FX camera to show us what it looked like</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/12/random-japanese-guy-shows-35mm-af-s-f18g-on-fx/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bj0rn&#8217;s Got a Nikkor 35mm AF-S f/1.8G!</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/12/bj0rns-got-a-nikkor-35mm-af-s-f18g/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/12/bj0rns-got-a-nikkor-35mm-af-s-f18g/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bjorn&#8217;s a well-respected, ridiculously techy photographer so I generally pay attention to what he says- as opposed to the other guys who &#8220;review&#8221; gear they&#8217;ve never touched, for example.
A few test shots confirm &#8211; not unexpectedly &#8211; that the Nikon wizards know their trade. Of course. The 35/1.8 does project an image circle that is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 85px"><img title="Bjorn Reviews 35mm AF-S f/1.8G" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/lensessmall.jpg" alt="Bjorn Reviews 35mm AF-S f/1.8G" width="75" height="128" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Bjorn Reviews 35mm AF-S f/1.8G</p></div>
<p><a href="http://nikongear.com/smf/index.php?topic=14710.0;all">Bjorn&#8217;s a well-respected, ridiculously techy photographer</a> so I generally pay attention to what he says- as opposed to the other guys who &#8220;review&#8221; gear they&#8217;ve never touched, for example.</p>
<blockquote><p>A few test shots confirm &#8211; not unexpectedly &#8211; that the Nikon wizards know their trade. Of course. The 35/1.8 does project an image circle that is bigger than the bare minimum needed for DX, but is smaller than FX. You get heavy vignetting and severe loss of sharpness outside hte DX format area. If you find the fall-offof the corners acceptable, you could just barely scrape by using the FX camera set to 5:4 format.</p></blockquote>
<p>Note- when you visit his site- you do NOT see the images if you are not logged in. So register, login, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/12/bj0rns-got-a-nikkor-35mm-af-s-f18g/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon Profit- DOWN!</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/06/canon-profit-down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/06/canon-profit-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 18:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Budapest Business Journal reports:

Japan&#8217;s Canon Inc reported an 81.5% fall in quarterly profit as a deepening recession hit demand for cameras and office equipment, and it forecast a bigger-than-expected profit decline for 2009.

Operating profit at Canon, the world&#8217;s largest digital camera maker ahead of Sony Corp and Nikon Corp, came in at ¥35.8 billion ($401.7 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="newsLead"><a href="http://bbjonline.hu/?col=1000&amp;id=46647">Budapest Business Journal reports:</a></div>
<blockquote>
<div class="newsLead">Japan&#8217;s Canon Inc reported an 81.5% fall in quarterly profit as a deepening recession hit demand for cameras and office equipment, and it forecast a bigger-than-expected profit decline for 2009.</div>
<div class="newsContent">
<p>Operating profit at <strong>Canon</strong>, the world&#8217;s largest digital camera maker ahead of <strong>Sony Corp</strong> and <strong>Nikon Corp,</strong> came in at ¥35.8 billion ($401.7 million) in October-December, down from ¥193.58 billion a year earlier.</p>
<p>&#8230;For 2009, Canon forecast an operating profit of ¥160 billion, down from ¥496.1 billion a year earlier and compared with the consensus forecast for a ¥309.8 billion profit in a poll of 16 analysts by Reuters Estimates.<br />
&#8230;</p></div>
</blockquote>
<p>So, the hurt is all over the place!  Canon&#8217;s definitely more diversified than Nikon though.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s interesting to me is that most large international companies hedge currencies so that if there&#8217;s a dramatic up or down swing, they don&#8217;t lose as much money. I wonder to what extent these companies are doing that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/06/canon-profit-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon NEF Format Info</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/04/nikon-nef-format-info/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/04/nikon-nef-format-info/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nef]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Update: Thanks to Laurent for correcting the attribution of the code! Also, the Nikon NEF SDK decrypts the WB info too.
Some of us are plenty happy to let CaptureNX, Photoshop, and others worry about turning our NEF&#8217;s into something usable, but various intrepid people (who&#8217;re smart than I am) like lclevy (Dave Coffin) just can&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[Update: <a href="Laurent (http://lclevy.free.fr/raw/)">Thanks to Laurent</a> for correcting the attribution of the code! Also, the <a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/01/28/hell-freezes-over-the-nikon-dslr-sdk-can-be-obtained/">Nikon NEF SDK</a> decrypts the WB info too.</p>
<p>Some of us are plenty happy to let CaptureNX, Photoshop, and others worry about turning our NEF&#8217;s into something usable, but various intrepid people (who&#8217;re smart than I am) like <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">lclevy</span> (<a href="http://www.cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw/">Dave Coffin</a>) just can&#8217;t let a challenge like encrypted whitebalances alone.</p>
<p>So he&#8217;s posted <a href="http://lclevy.free.fr/nef/index.html">a wad of info on the NEF format and its header as well as some C code</a> for you to open up the whitebalance info.</p>
<p>Interesting (to me), it&#8217;s based on the TIFF format. Otoh, the TIFF format is so flexible that I shouldn&#8217;t have been surprised.</p>
<p>Luckily, he&#8217;s hosted it in France, so there&#8217;s no change of DMCA take-down notice being filed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/04/nikon-nef-format-info/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s Next for Nikon?</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/03/whats-next-for-nikon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/03/whats-next-for-nikon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 03:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There aren&#8217;t any good rumor around, so let&#8217;s speculate!
Trends What general themes have we been seeing over the last few years:
More Megapixels: This is a no-brainer, the market demands.
Better Noise Characteristics: The market really was not demanding this, but we got it anyway with the D3, then we saw much better than expected noise characteristics [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><img title="Speculation: D3xs D700x D3x" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/8ball.jpg" alt="Speculation: D3xs D700x D3x" width="150" height="150" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Speculation: D3xs D700x D3x</p></div>
<p>There aren&#8217;t any good rumor around, so let&#8217;s speculate!</p>
<p><em><strong>Trends</strong> </em>What general themes have we been seeing over the last few years:</p>
<p><strong>More Megapixels</strong>: This is a no-brainer, the market demands.</p>
<p><strong>Better Noise Characteristics</strong>: The market really was not demanding this, but we got it anyway with the D3, then we saw much better than expected noise characteristics in the D3x and Canon still has yet to equal Nikon&#8217;s abilities.</p>
<p>Thus I&#8217;m going to bet that we&#8217;ll see more effort from Canon to attempt to catch up than we&#8217;ll see Nikon get substantially better. In addition, this is much more a hardware (sensor) design issue than a software-bottlenecked area- the software is only likely to get marginally better, whether inside the camera, or on my crazy 4-core machine.</p>
<p><strong>Smaller Bodies</strong>: There&#8217;s no good reason we couldn&#8217;t get the D3&#8217;s sensor in a smaller body, and voila! Since the D3x is a D3 with a different sensor (and software), we&#8217;re very likely to see a D700x or similar.</p>
<p><strong>Backfilling Lenses</strong>: Nikon knows it&#8217;s missing AF-S primes. They threw the beginner SLR  (D40, D60, etc) owners a bone with 50mm (those cameras couldn&#8217;t use the AF version). Now they can get us an 85mm AF-S and I&#8217;ve got money waiting for a <strong>good</strong> 35mm AF-S prime.</p>
<p><em>So what&#8217;s missing, lens-wise</em>: <strong>Primes</strong>- 35mm, 28mm, 16mm fisheye, 85mm. Anything else?</p>
<p>[<strong>Update</strong>: I'd gladly slap down $2k for an AF-S Noct, preferably in the 35-45mm range.]</p>
<hr /><em><strong>The Economy</strong></em>: Clearly, this is the worst of all the trends. Here&#8217;s what I&#8217;m expecting:</p>
<p><strong>More Point-and-shoots</strong>: God save us from the Coolpix invasion. They&#8217;re cheap, you can&#8217;t tell one model from the next, P&amp;S buyers are into megapixel, zoom, size, looks. Nikon is likely to crank them out.</p>
<p><strong>More Special Editions</strong>: Hey, remember the <a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/26/735/">horrific gold-edition D60</a>? Want a gold-edition D90?</p>
<p><strong>More Gimics</strong>: I&#8217;m going to go out on a limb here- <em>we&#8217;re going to see movie mode</em> slipped into some existing models, or some D*x bodies with movie mode. I can definitely see it on the D3 and D3x- let&#8217;s call them the D3s and D3xs models. <em>Maybe with a touch-screens too.</em></p>
<p>If we&#8217;re lucky, we&#8217;ll also see <strong>upgraded bodies with WiFi</strong> slapped into them (or GPS and WiFi)- it&#8217;s too easy, it costs next to nothing, the physical is next to nothing, and the battery usage is tolerable. IMO- <strong>only Nikon trying to sell us <a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/2007/08/25/wt-4-so-ugly-youll-definitely-stand-out-as-a-pro/">WT-4a&#8217;s</a> has prevented this so far.</strong></p>
<p><strong>More Smaller Stuff</strong>: I suspect we&#8217;re going to see some interesting smaller projetcs. For example- <strong>I can&#8217;t see any reason we can get a bluetooth adapter for our flashes to get RF into action</strong> without buying pocketwizards or similar add-ons. Like wifi- bluetooth is legal frequency spectrum just about everywhere on earth at this point.</p>
<p><strong>Fewer high-end bodies</strong>: Why spend the R&amp;D when the sales of the bodies aren&#8217;t going to see a quick return?</p>
<p><strong>Fewer high-end lenses</strong>: Those missing primes I just mentioned? Unless they&#8217;re just about to be announced (PMA?), they&#8217;re unlikely to happen. Same reason as the high-end bodies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/03/whats-next-for-nikon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prices</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/03/prices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/03/prices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 02:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m seeing various reports of prices rising from not bad to ok and from ok to ok+a little in the US.
Nothing like the Armageddon that was being talked about. But maybe I&#8217;m different- another $100 on $1,800 isn&#8217;t going to make my choke because the $1,800 already made me choke.
On the other hand- that 200mm [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 138px"><img title="Nikon Price Increases" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/candlestick.gif" alt="Nikon Price Increases" width="128" height="175" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon Price Increases</p></div>
<p>I&#8217;m seeing <a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1030&amp;thread=30866800">various reports</a> of prices rising from not bad to ok and from ok to ok+a little in the US.</p>
<p>Nothing like the Armageddon that was being talked about. But maybe I&#8217;m different- another $100 on $1,800 isn&#8217;t going to make my choke because the $1,800 <strong>already</strong> made me choke.</p>
<p>On the other hand- that 200mm f/2 you had your eye on is now $4599.95 from B&amp;H! I&#8217;m pretty sure they were ~$4,000 in December. Yikes. (But you already knew- &#8220;<a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/01/19/nikon-pricing-when-to-buy/">Only pro&#8217;s buy this lense.</a>&#8220;)</p>
<p>I used to think used Hassy lenses at $1,000 were expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/02/03/prices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Camera Board- MyCanikon.com</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/01/31/new-camera-board-mycanikoncom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/01/31/new-camera-board-mycanikoncom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Update: Link fixed, sorry- Wordpress feature tripped me up again.]
In these times of the end-of-days of NIkonians, megapixel-wars, full-frame vs cropped-frame riots, and competing flagship bodies, it&#8217;s nice to see a place where both camps can get together and gripe show some shots:
Eric dropped me a messsage and would like me to plug the forums [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[<strong>Update: </strong>Link fixed, sorry- Wordpress feature tripped me up again.]</p>
<p>In these times of the end-of-days of NIkonians, megapixel-wars, full-frame vs cropped-frame riots, and competing flagship bodies, it&#8217;s nice to see a place where both camps can get together and <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">gripe</span> show some shots:</p>
<p>Eric dropped me a messsage and would like me to plug the forums that he&#8217;s set up here:<br />
<a href="http://www.mycanikon.com">www.mycanikon.com</a></p>
<p>Full warning though, I&#8217;ve let him know that NikonWatch is setting up its own forums- soon as I find the time to monkey with CSS pages and, <em>(ugh not again)</em>, PHP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/01/31/new-camera-board-mycanikoncom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D700 Shoots Video (basically&#8230;) So Can Your Live-View Capable Body</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/01/28/nikon-d700-shoots-video-basically-so-can-your-live-view-capable-body/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/01/28/nikon-d700-shoots-video-basically-so-can-your-live-view-capable-body/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sdk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Olivier Giroux has taken the SDK I just posted about and used it to grab frames from the D700&#8217;s live preview function! 
This means that, presumably and subject to tinkering, any of the bodies supported by the SDK and having Live View functionality can also do the same thing. It&#8217;s not full resolution (it&#8217;s only [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Olivier Giroux has taken the SDK I just posted about and u<a href="http://ogiroux.wordpress.com/2009/01/27/d700-shoots-vide/">sed it to grab frames from the D700&#8217;s live preview function! </a></p>
<p>This means that, presumably and subject to tinkering, any of the bodies supported by the SDK and having Live View functionality can also do the same thing. It&#8217;s not full resolution (it&#8217;s only what the LCD on the camera body would show), but it&#8217;s still remarkably decent.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an example:<br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="400" height="323" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Z5LD-t78KP8&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="323" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Z5LD-t78KP8&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Please see his post for <a href="&lt;object width=&quot;400&quot; height=&quot;323&quot;&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/Z5LD-t78KP8&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;allowFullScreen&quot; value=&quot;true&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/Z5LD-t78KP8&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1&quot; type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; allowfullscreen=&quot;true&quot; width=&quot;400&quot; height=&quot;323&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt; ">another video and more details.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/01/28/nikon-d700-shoots-video-basically-so-can-your-live-view-capable-body/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D3x Prices Down in Canada!</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/01/26/d3x-prices-down-in-canada/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/01/26/d3x-prices-down-in-canada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 03:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d3x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve mentioned this yet- last week, I walked into a pawn shop around where I work and saw the random old Canon and Nikon (FM&#8217;s mainly), huge Mamiya, and wasn&#8217;t too thrilled. Looked a little longer and saw a MINT F&#8217;ing F3! The best one I&#8217;ve yet seen in person. Looks like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 138px"><img title="Nikon D3x Prices Lower in CA" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/candlestick.gif" alt="Nikon D3x Prices Lower in CA" width="128" height="175" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon D3x Prices Lower in CA</p></div>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve mentioned this yet- last week, I walked into a pawn shop around where I work and saw the random old Canon and Nikon (FM&#8217;s mainly), huge Mamiya, and wasn&#8217;t too thrilled. Looked a little longer and saw a MINT F&#8217;ing F3! The best one I&#8217;ve yet seen in person. Looks like grandpa never used it once.</p>
<p>Price? $498.00. Conversation went about like this:</p>
<p><strong>Matt</strong>: I&#8217;ll give you $250 right now.</p>
<p><strong>Them</strong>: No.</p>
<p><strong>Matt</strong>: $300.</p>
<p><strong>Them</strong>: I don&#8217;t think [the owner] will go for that.</p>
<p><strong>Matt</strong>: Look- how often is someone going to walk in off of the street, spot a film-body and offer you cash on the spot?</p>
<p><strong>Them</strong>: &#8230;(unphased)&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Matt</strong>: On ebay, I bought one recently in similar condition for $300, you&#8217;re not going to do better than that and if you don&#8217;t want to sell it to me now, then I&#8217;d recommend you sell it on ebay, because no one else is going to walk in and want to buy it.</p>
<p><strong>Them</strong>: &#8230;(unphased)&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Matt: </strong>(leaves)</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t quite understand the shop&#8217;s way of thinking- presumably they bought the camera with cash and it&#8217;s likely sat on the shelf for a while. They&#8217;re paying rent and utilities and labor- having inventory sitting on the shelf does nothing to generate income. Also- while their $100 (let&#8217;s pretend that&#8217;s what they bought it for) is sitting on the shelf in the form of a mint F3, they&#8217;re losing the interest they could have been earning on it. A store&#8217;s goal is to have as little inventory as practical- they only make money on product turn-over.</p>
<p>I mention this because <a href="http://www.naturalart.ca/voice/blog.html">Brad points out to me that in Canada, the price of the D3x is actually coming down</a>, probably because shops figure it&#8217;s better to get a few hundred less on the D3x than nothing at all- inventory sitting around is actually costing you money:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;by<strong> last week</strong> a number of western Canadian Pro Nikon dealers have <strong>dropped the price by $250 and are now advertising the camera at $9199.00</strong>. It would seem that the <em>D3x is NOT flying off the shelves in western Canada</em> (an area quite well buffered from the economic malaise hitting almost everywhere else in the world). I haven&#8217;t bothered checking, but odds are this is happening right across Canada (both the slow sales and dealer discounts on the D3x).</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ll be going back to that shop on Friday- maybe I&#8217;ll be able to convince them. Likely as not, it&#8217;ll be gone and I&#8217;ll be kicking myself for letting a near MIB F3hp get past me. Or maybe they&#8217;ll see thinks my way- $300 in hand is better than $500 in the form of a camera on the shelf.</p>
<p>Thanks Brad!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/01/26/d3x-prices-down-in-canada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikonians.org Going Pay Membership Only</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/01/26/nikoniansorg-going-pay-membership-only/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/01/26/nikoniansorg-going-pay-membership-only/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The reason I started this site is because the second anyone on Nikonians would post a rumor, the admins would lock the thread or nuke it and tell the person to take a hike.
This turned me off- speculating and (preferably) getting rumors on Nikon equipment was the main reason I was there. So I stopped [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason I started this site is because the second anyone on Nikonians would post a rumor, the admins would lock the thread or nuke it and tell the person to take a hike.</p>
<p>This turned me off- speculating and (preferably) getting rumors on Nikon equipment was the main reason I was there. So I stopped bothering and read dpReview instead.</p>
<p>Well we&#8217;ve just been told that they will allow a free registration and entry to their forums for a month and then you&#8217;ll have to pay $25 (or slightly less with a code) in order to access the forums from then on.</p>
<p><strong>This is the death of Nikonians.</strong></p>
<p>Invariably, sites do this right before they go under in an attempt to recoup costs. But when they have to resort to this, it means they&#8217;re about to die anyway because they can&#8217;t make enough money from advertisements, and <em>the reduced ad traffic isn&#8217;t going to be covered by people paying for the memberships</em>. Then a death-spiral until one day the site merely says they&#8217;re gone.</p>
<p>The only workable model yet to be devised for non-pr0n sites like this and Nikonians is: free access, advertisements and referrals bring in money. If your overhead is too high for the money coming in, then you do it because you like it or you shut down.</p>
<p>While their announcement doesn&#8217;t specify what their costs are, I&#8217;ve read somewhere it was $2m/year, and I can say from experience, <strong>if they were spending $2m/year running their website, they have no business being in business.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/01/26/nikoniansorg-going-pay-membership-only/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Circuit City Owes Nikon $14,926,445</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/01/25/circuit-city-owes-nikon-14926445/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/01/25/circuit-city-owes-nikon-14926445/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 18:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankrupcy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=1002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Circuit City was a not so great (in my opinion) &#8216;big-box&#8217; consumer electronics store.
A couple of years ago, they started to do poorly, got a new CEO who then laid-off their best sales people because they were getting paid too much (in his opinion). Shortly after that, they did a lot worse (surprise!) and have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 138px"><img title="Circuit City Owes Nikon" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/candlestick.gif" alt="Circuit City Owes Nikon" width="128" height="175" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Circuit City Owes Nikon</p></div>
<p><a href="http://www.circuitcity.com/closed.html">Circuit City </a>was a not so great (in my opinion) &#8216;big-box&#8217; consumer electronics store.</p>
<p>A couple of years ago, they started to do poorly, got a new CEO who then laid-off their best sales people because they were getting paid too much (in his opinion). Shortly after that, t<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?chdnp=1&amp;chdd=1&amp;chds=1&amp;chdv=1&amp;chvs=maximized&amp;chdeh=0&amp;chdet=1232907713434&amp;chddm=182732&amp;q=OTC:CCTYQ&amp;ntsp=0">hey did a lot worse (surprise!)</a> and have been near death until just recently <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=aXeltuiAOyzs">when they&#8217;ve gone totally bust</a>.</p>
<p>The last time I visited, around Christmas, I saw a D40(?) and D60 and some crappy kit lenses in barely working order in the their &#8220;camera&#8221; gulag. Unfortunately, those crappy lenses and low-end bodies and Coolpix&#8217;s will likely cost Nikon nearly $15m.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/01/25/circuit-city-owes-nikon-14926445/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon Pricing- When to Buy</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/01/19/nikon-pricing-when-to-buy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/01/19/nikon-pricing-when-to-buy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you didn&#8217;t know- there&#8217;s another Nikon site out there that maintains a list of where they expect the prices for various bodies and Nikkor lenses to go and when you should buy.
Let&#8217;s get this straight: in general, the longer you wait to buy something the less it&#8217;s going to cost, with few exceptions.
The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 138px"><img title="Nikon Cameras - price, when to buy" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/candlestick.gif" alt="Nikon-When to buy" width="128" height="175" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon-When to buy</p></div>
<p>In case you didn&#8217;t know- there&#8217;s another Nikon site out there that maintains a list of where they expect the prices for various bodies and Nikkor lenses to go and when you should buy.</p>
<p><em>Let&#8217;s get this straight</em>: in general, <strong>the longer you wait to buy something the less it&#8217;s going to cost</strong>, with few exceptions.</p>
<p>The <strong>main exception is whacky currency fluctuations</strong>. The current economy is doing strange things and that&#8217;s why we&#8217;re seeing Nikon prices tending upward.</p>
<p>The Yen has gone up ~11% vs the USD since the D3 became widely available. Nearly 17% versus the Australian dollar, not quite doubled (if I&#8217;m reading the graphs correctly) vs the British Pound, and up &gt;20% vs the Euro.</p>
<p>Recent headlines regarding Yen include: &#8220;<a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/marketsNewsUS/idUKT7159220090108">Nikkei may hover before US data, yen rise a worry</a>&#8221; , &#8220;<a href="http://www.dailyfx.com/story/currency/jpy_fundamentals/Japanese_Yen_May_Strengthen_On_1230316431899.html">Japanese Yen May Strengthen On Declining Global Outlook</a>&#8220;, and &#8220;<a href="http://www.economicnews.ca/cepnews/wire/article/191388">Japanese Yen Makes Gains Against Euro, Majors Following Unexpected BOJ Rate Cut</a>&#8220;.</p>
<p>Keep in mind though, that currencies fluctuate, meaning that the current runup in the Yen can also go the other way, if you&#8217;re being priced out of the market, you might as well wait if the increase is painful to you.</p>
<p><strong>Secondary exceptions are mainly</strong> relegated to scarcity and <strong>the &#8220;Only pro&#8217;s can afford this&#8221;-tax</strong>. Basically, that 600mm Nano VR2 lens you had your eye on is probably not ever going to see any appreciable price reduction. Why? Because &#8220;Only Pros Buy This.&#8221; That is- businesses that need it can afford it. Amateurs like me generally won&#8217;t bother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/01/19/nikon-pricing-when-to-buy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PBase D3x vs D3 Noise Test</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/01/12/pbase-d3x-vs-d3-noise-test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/01/12/pbase-d3x-vs-d3-noise-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d3x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stop me if you&#8217;ve heard this one before, but a bit ago, PBase put up a quick comparison between the Nikon D3x noise and the D3&#8217;s noise.
Apparently, the D3 is the low-noise Emperor while the D3x does a respectable job, especially given its megapixel count.
From quickly looking at the shots from the D3x, you produce [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 250px"><img title="Nikon D3x vs Nikon D3 on Noise" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/noise.jpg" alt="Nikon D3x vs Nikon D3 on Noise" width="240" height="178" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon D3x vs Nikon D3 on Noise</p></div>
<p>Stop me if you&#8217;ve heard this one before, but a bit ago, <a href="http://www.pbase.com/chipscar/d3_vs_d3x_tests">PBase put up a quick comparison between the Nikon D3x noise and the D3</a>&#8217;s noise.</p>
<p>Apparently, the D3 is the low-noise Emperor while the D3x does a respectable job, especially given its megapixel count.</p>
<p>From quickly looking at the shots from the D3x, you produce (what looks to me) like a much sharper shot at a NR setting of &#8220;Low&#8221; than you&#8217;d get without any NR. But that might just be their setup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/01/12/pbase-d3x-vs-d3-noise-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Word About Advertisements</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/01/06/another-word-about-advertisements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/01/06/another-word-about-advertisements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve posted about this before, but Pete wants me to point it out again:
I don&#8217;t control the advertisers that Google feeds this site.
Some of them will be unscrupulous.
If the price is looks too good to be true &#8211; guess what? Either you will avoid that advertiser, or your momma raised a sucker.
One guy actually went [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/2007/09/13/a-word-about-advertisers-warning/">I&#8217;ve posted about this before</a>, but Pete wants me to point it out again:</p>
<p><strong>I don&#8217;t control the advertisers </strong>that Google feeds this site.</p>
<p>Some of them <strong>will </strong>be unscrupulous.</p>
<p><strong>If the price is looks too good to be true</strong> &#8211; guess what? Either you will avoid that advertiser, or your momma raised a sucker.</p>
<p>One guy actually <a href="http://donwiss.com/pictures/BrooklynStores/#121">went around taking pictures of some of these places</a>- guess what kind of operation you might be buying from?</p>
<p>From the previous post:</p>
<hr />
<h2>A Word About Advertisers- Warning.</h2>
<p>On many sites, and even this one (because I don’t control what ads Google feeds me) you will see things like “D2xs Camera Kit- $999!!!!!”.</p>
<p><strong>It’s just like your momma told you</strong>- <em>if the price is too good to be true, then it’s not true</em>.</p>
<p>If you see ridiculously low prices like this, it means that it’ll likely be imported (Nikon only warrants their stuff if you buy within your own country, with very few exceptions), they’ll not sell you the whole thing- you might get the body then they’ll tell you that it doesn’t include the battery, etc, they might REQUIRE you to spend a wad of money on crappy lenses, they will probably make you wait months before shipping anything (because you didn’t buy their lenses- you’ll eventually cancel your order), etc.</p>
<p>Deal with a reputable outfit <strong>only</strong>.</p>
<p>That’s why when I go to NYC or I need a big purchase, I deal with <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/">B&amp;H Photo Video</a>. While yes, I will probably join their affiliate system, I’m only recommending them because I use them and never have had any undue problems with them.</p>
<p>If I ever <strong>have </strong>any trouble with them, I will tell you about it. <strong>If you’ve ever had any issues with them, please leave a comment or mail me directly</strong>, I’d like to know about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2009/01/06/another-word-about-advertisements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DNS Changes, etc</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/30/dns-changes-etc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/30/dns-changes-etc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My hosting company&#8217;s email setup it not swell. So I&#8217;m trying to change it and I&#8217;ve got monkey with various DNS settings, etc, to get that done.
Which means that there may be some hiccups now and then, no need for alarm.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My hosting company&#8217;s email setup it not swell. So I&#8217;m trying to change it and I&#8217;ve got monkey with various DNS settings, etc, to get that done.</p>
<p>Which means that there may be some hiccups now and then, no need for alarm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/30/dns-changes-etc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PC-E Lenses- Change the Tilt/Shift Orientation Yourself!</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/25/pc-e-lenses-change-the-tiltshift-orientation-yourself/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/25/pc-e-lenses-change-the-tiltshift-orientation-yourself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 01:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pc-e]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So you just bought your nice new 24mm (let&#8217;s pretend) $1800-ish PC-E lense and you&#8217;re all like, &#8220;The manual says I have to send it in to get tilt and shift on the same axis?!&#8221;
But you&#8217;ve got no time and a pair of:
And you&#8217;re all like, &#8220;Whatever, I do what I want!&#8221; Well, just 4 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you just bought your nice new 24mm (let&#8217;s pretend) $1800-ish PC-E lense and you&#8217;re all like, &#8220;The manual says I have to send it in to get tilt and shift on the same axis?!&#8221;</p>
<p>But you&#8217;ve got no time and a pair of:</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 202px"><img title="PC-E Tilt/Shift Axis Change At Home!" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/brassballs.jpg" alt="PC-E Tilt/Shift Axis Change" width="192" height="154" /><p class="wp-caption-text">PC-E Tilt/Shift Axis Change</p></div>
<p>And you&#8217;re all like, &#8220;<a href="http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/153246">Whatever, I do what I want!</a>&#8221; Well, just 4 screws and a 90&#8242; twist and you can conveniently do it at home&#8211; <a href="http://www.motifnation.hu/index.php/type/concept/nikon_pc-e_24mm_tilt_shift_axis_swap/">MotifNation shows you how</a>!</p>
<p>In fact, it looks so easy, you might wonder why Nikon didn&#8217;t make it possible to do on the fly without removing the screws.</p>
<p>Some comments by <a href="http://www.nikonians.org/forums/dcboard.php?az=set_threaded_mode&amp;forum=146&amp;topic_id=134934&amp;prev_page=show_topic&amp;gid=134934">people who&#8217;ve done this here</a>. The screwdriver has been reported to be a Phillips #000 and you might want to use some less-adhesive loctite before you put the screws back if you intend to keep it that way.</p>
<p>It reportedly costs $126 to have Nikon perform the same process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/25/pc-e-lenses-change-the-tiltshift-orientation-yourself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>QUICK Noise Comparison &#8211; Nikon D700 vs the Canon 5D Mark II</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/24/quick-noise-comparison-nikon-d700-vs-the-canon-5d-mark-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/24/quick-noise-comparison-nikon-d700-vs-the-canon-5d-mark-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 21:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Photography Bay has a really quick noise comparison between the Nikon D700 and the Canon 5D Mark II.
No huge surprise, the Nikon does better all around in my view, but this is clearly meant as a cheeseball comparison.
(Hat-tip to Leonardo)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 250px"><img title="Canon 5D MarkII vs Nikon D700" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/noise.jpg" alt="Canon 5D MarkII vs Nikon D700" width="240" height="178" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Canon 5D MarkII vs Nikon D700</p></div>
<p>Photography Bay has a <a href="http://www.photographybay.com/2008/12/18/canon-5d-mark-ii-and-nikon-d700-high-iso-quick-comparison/">really quick noise comparison</a> between the Nikon D700 and the Canon 5D Mark II.</p>
<p>No huge surprise, the Nikon does better all around in my view, but this is clearly meant as a cheeseball comparison.</p>
<p>(Hat-tip to Leonardo)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/24/quick-noise-comparison-nikon-d700-vs-the-canon-5d-mark-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Clapp Compares Nikon Nikkor 14-24mm to the Zeiss ZF 21mm</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/23/david-clapp-compares-nikon-nikkor-14-24mm-to-the-zeiss-zf-21mm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/23/david-clapp-compares-nikon-nikkor-14-24mm-to-the-zeiss-zf-21mm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 03:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[14-24mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zeiss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Clapps pixel-peeps the Zeiss 21mm ZF lens and compares it to the Nikon 14-24mm. Zeiss lenses are generally considered to be great and the 14-24mm has been considereding amazing for a zoom.
While I love my Zeiss lenses, you have to give it to the 14-24mm, it either matches or clocks the the Zeiss everywhere [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 85px"><img title="Nikon 14-24mm vs Zeiss 21mm - Comparison/Review" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/lensessmall.jpg" alt="Nikon 14-24mm vs Zeiss 21mm - Comparison/Review" width="75" height="128" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon 14-24mm vs Zeiss 21mm - Comparison /Review</p></div>
<p>David Clapps pixel-peeps the Zeiss 21mm ZF lens and compares it to the Nikon 14-24mm. Zeiss lenses are generally considered to be great and the 14-24mm has been considereding amazing for a zoom.</p>
<p>While I love my Zeiss lenses, you have to give it to the 14-24mm, it either matches or <a href="http://www.davidclapp.co.uk/Cz21-1424_p2">clocks the the Zeiss everywhere after f/2.8</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/23/david-clapp-compares-nikon-nikkor-14-24mm-to-the-zeiss-zf-21mm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FWIW: Ken Rockwell Reviews Nikkor 50mm F/1.4g AF-S</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/21/fwiw-ken-rockwell-reviews-nikkor-50mm-f14g-af-s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/21/fwiw-ken-rockwell-reviews-nikkor-50mm-f14g-af-s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you follow Ken at all, he&#8217;s got a review of the 50mm AF-S f/1.4g up now.
Oh and look! His kid&#8217;s growing up   You&#8217;d expect a guy like Ken to take some more interesting test shots than pictures of his son&#8230; At least if he wants to maintain my interest.
The only gotchas are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 85px"><img title="Nikkor 50mm f/1.4g AF-S Review" src="http://www.nikonWatch.com/images/lensessmall.jpg" alt="Nikkor 50mm f/1.4g AF-S Review" width="75" height="128" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikkor 50mm f/1.4g AF-S Review</p></div>
<p>If you follow Ken at all, he&#8217;s got a <a href="http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/50mm-f14-afs.htm">review of the 50mm AF-S f/1.4g</a> up now.</p>
<p>Oh and look! <a href="http://www.kenrockwell.com/ryan/2007/2007-02.htm">His kid&#8217;s growing up</a> <img src='http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  You&#8217;d expect a guy like Ken to take some more interesting test shots than pictures of his son&#8230; At least if he wants to maintain my interest.</p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family: Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;">The only gotchas are that<strong> this new lens has more barrel distortion than the old 50mm f/1.4 AF-D</strong>, it has a weird 58mm (not standard 52mm) filter size, and that this new lens is useless on Nikons made before about 1990.</span></p></blockquote>
<p>Oh hey, wait a minute- MORE barrel distortion? That&#8217;s not cool.</p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family: Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;">I&#8217;m getting sharp, haze-free shots dead-on in-focus at f/1.4 on all of my cameras, where at f/1.4 my old <a href="http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/5014af.htm">50/1.4 AF-D</a> often had more veil, bloom  or glow  (what scientists call  spherical aberration) in real shots.</span></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p><span style="font-family: Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;">This <strong>new AF-S 50 has more linear distortion than any other fixed Nikon 50mm ever made</strong>.</span></p></blockquote>
<p>Ha:</p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family: Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;"><strong>Complain about kid pictures all you want</strong>, but unlike shooting Formula One racing or American hero Lance Armstrong, you don&#8217;t know where the kid is going next. Just try getting an in-focus shot without AF. </span></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/21/fwiw-ken-rockwell-reviews-nikkor-50mm-f14g-af-s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D3x Tests</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/21/nikon-d3x-tests/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/21/nikon-d3x-tests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d3x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imaging Resources has some great test shots with the Nikon D3x here.
Lots of difference shutter / aperture combo&#8217;s, include standard color charts, etc, gray background this time instead of blue.
ISO 3200 on the D3x in these shots (for example) still looks like a &#8220;only when required&#8217; setup and I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s meant to be- who&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 250px"><img title="Nikon D3x Noise / Sample Shots /  Review" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/noise.jpg" alt="Nikon D3x Noise / Sample Shots /  Review" width="240" height="178" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon D3x Noise / Sample Shots /  Review</p></div>
<p>Imaging Resources has some <a href="http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/D3X/D3XA7.HTM">great test shots with the Nikon D3x here</a>.</p>
<p>Lots of difference shutter / aperture combo&#8217;s, include standard color charts, etc, gray background this time instead of blue.</p>
<p>ISO 3200 on the D3x in these shots (<a href="http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/D3X/FULLRES/D3XhSLI3200_NR_NORM.HTM">for example</a>) still looks like a &#8220;only when required&#8217; setup and I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s meant to be- who&#8217;s shooting a high-res camera meant for the studio at 3200? Even the landscape guys don&#8217;t need to go that high (I&#8217;m thinking).</p>
<p>3200 seems like ~800 on the d2x and something closer to 6400 on the D3 (I rarely shoot that high, I&#8217;m likely wrong on this guess)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/21/nikon-d3x-tests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D3x Noise Test at Various ISO&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/17/nikon-d3x-noise-test-at-various-isos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/17/nikon-d3x-noise-test-at-various-isos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d3x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[iZyz has some still-life studio shots of a doll at all of the Nikon D3x&#8217;s ISO speeds.
No noise reduction claimed, no post.
Impressions- without NR, you won&#8217;t want to go above 200 iso if you don&#8217;t have to. Expose to the right. 3200 iso is only if you can&#8217;t get the shop any other way- but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 250px"><img title="Nikon D3x Noise / Sample Shots / Review" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/noise.jpg" alt="Nikon D3x Noise / Sample Shots / Review" width="240" height="178" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon D3x Noise / Sample Shots / Review</p></div>
<p>iZyz has some still-life studio shots of a <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/feke/sets/72157611292648111/">doll at all of the Nikon D3x&#8217;s ISO speeds</a>.</p>
<p>No noise reduction claimed, no post.</p>
<p>Impressions- without NR, you won&#8217;t want to go above 200 iso if you don&#8217;t have to. Expose to the right. 3200 iso is only if you can&#8217;t get the shop any other way- but you&#8217;d be silly to use the D3x at 3200- that&#8217;s what the D3&#8217;s for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/17/nikon-d3x-noise-test-at-various-isos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shameless Plug: B&amp;H Photo Has 200mm VR f/2 In Stock!</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/11/shameless-plug-bh-photo-has-200mm-vr-f2-in-stock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/11/shameless-plug-bh-photo-has-200mm-vr-f2-in-stock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re looking for a 200mm VR f/2, B&#38;H has them in stock now.
I mention this for 2 reasons:
1) It&#8217;s a hard lens to find in stock because they only make them in batches a few times a year. Nikon does this with all their high-end glass.
2) If you like this site and want to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="border: 2px solid black; margin: 2px;" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/lensessmall.jpg" alt="" width="75" height="128" />If you&#8217;re looking for a 200mm VR f/2, <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/337510-USA/Nikon_2150_200mm_f_2_0G_AF_S_ED_IF.html">B&amp;H has them in stock now</a>.</p>
<p>I mention this for 2 reasons:</p>
<p>1) It&#8217;s a hard lens to find in stock because they only make them in batches a few times a year. Nikon does this with all their high-end glass.</p>
<p>2) If you like this site and want to throw a couple of bucks my way to encourage me to continue, you can click a B&amp;H ad on this site (like at the top of the main page) and then complete the order. This way, they know if came from my site and I get a couple of bucks thrown back to me.</p>
<p>They <strong>also have the PC-E lenses in stock</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>Why do I like B&amp;H?</strong> If they say it&#8217;s in stock, it&#8217;s in stock. If they say it&#8217;s $XX, it&#8217;s $XX. There isn&#8217;t any funny business.</p>
<p>Btw- <strong>Remember that thrill you had as a kid when you got to go to ToysRUs</strong> or some similar toy store? If you&#8217;re ever in Manhattan, go to their store- you&#8217;ll get that same feeling if you&#8217;re into cameras or video or lighting, etc- they&#8217;ve got it all in stock for you to take a look at and play with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/11/shameless-plug-bh-photo-has-200mm-vr-f2-in-stock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time for a Tripod + Lens = VR On or Off Page, I Guess</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/10/time-for-a-tripod-lens-vr-on-or-off-page-i-guess/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/10/time-for-a-tripod-lens-vr-on-or-off-page-i-guess/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ I&#8217;m sensing the need for a page specifically dedicated to VR lenses and whether or not their manual says to turn the VR off when mounted on a tripod.
Bob wrote me to ask if the much-loved Nikkor 80-400mm wanted its VR turned off while on a tripod. Ya know what I told him? RTFM! [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="border: 2px solid black; margin: 2px;" title="nikon lenses vr on a tripod- on or off?" src="http://www.nikonWatch.com/images/lensessmall.jpg" alt="" width="75" height="128" /> I&#8217;m sensing the need for a page specifically dedicated to VR lenses and whether or not their manual says to turn the VR off when mounted on a tripod.</p>
<p>Bob wrote me to ask if the much-loved Nikkor 80-400mm wanted its VR turned off while on a tripod. Ya know what I told him? RTFM! That was the lesson that Brad was trying to teach us yesterday.</p>
<p>Thankfully, Brad did read the f&#8217;ing manual (and told me, because I was too lazy to do it for him):</p>
<blockquote><p>The <strong>80-400 manual says</strong>, and <em>I quote exactly</em>:</p>
<p>&#8220;When the lens is mounted on a tripod, <strong>set the vibration reduction switch to OFF.</strong> Set the vibration reduction switch to ON, when using a monopod or if the lens is mounted on a tripod without the head being locked in place.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Thanks Brad!</p>
<p>As I explained to Brad, and the actual reason that I put up anything on this topic is because the differences between having it on while on the tripod and turning it off were so pronounced!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/10/time-for-a-tripod-lens-vr-on-or-off-page-i-guess/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VR on a Tripod- It&#8217;s Even More Complex Than You&#8217;d Think</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/08/vr-on-a-tripod-its-even-more-complex-than-youd-think/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/08/vr-on-a-tripod-its-even-more-complex-than-youd-think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 01:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brad says that I got it wrong- that most people have probably got it wrong- even you! I reprint his message in its entirety (bolding is mine):
Matt,
Your entry entitled &#8220;On Tripod? VR OFF! Comparison Shots is over-simplified to the point of being extremely misleading.
In short, whether or not you should turn off the VR function [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad says that I got it wrong- that most people have probably got it wrong- even you! I reprint his message in its entirety (bolding is mine):</p>
<blockquote><p><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/lensessmall.jpg" alt="" width="75" height="128" /><em><strong>Matt,</strong></em></p>
<p><strong>Your entry entitled &#8220;On Tripod? VR OFF! Comparison Shots is over-simplified to the point of being extremely misleading.</strong></p>
<p>In short, whether or not you should turn off the VR function when mounted on a tripod varies with the lens. And, it also varies with how sturdy your tripod is and whether or not the head is tightened down. One thing that contributes to the confusion is how poorly it is expressed in the manuals (and, I have found a few typos in the VR sections of the  manuals, which compounds the problems).</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the situation with the VR lenses I currently own and have tested (and when mounted  on a firm tripod with head tightened down):</p>
<p>1. <strong>105 mm VR Micro: Turn VR off </strong>when on tripod (as stated in manual)</p>
<p>2. <strong>200 mm f2 VR: Turn VR off</strong> when on tripod (as stated in manual &#8211; albeit in a  confusing fashion)</p>
<p>3. <strong>300 mm f2.8 VR: Turn VR off</strong> when on tripod (as stated in manual)</p>
<p>4. <strong>200-400 mm f4 VR: A-Ok to leave VR on</strong> when on tripod (as stated in manual) BUT ensure VR is in &#8220;Normal&#8221; mode (not active mode)</p>
<p>5. <strong>600 mm f4 VR: Recommended to leave VR on</strong> when on tripod (as stated in manual) BUT  ensure VR is in &#8220;Tripod&#8221; mode &#8211; unless you are panning (as in following a bird) with a firm gimbal head (like a Wimberley).<br />
<strong><br />
Because of the poor performance of the 70-200 f2.8 VR on the full frame cameras, I have  recently jettisoned this lens</strong> and manual and can&#8217;t (without downloading the PDF manual) easily confirm what the manual says about this lens. But from my experience with it is that when firmly mounted on tripod you get better performance with the VR OFF.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t expect (or care) if you post this info, but <strong>it would probably help a LOT of people if you amend the current info to include the point that the VR ON vs. VR OFF issue <em>varies with the lens</em> </strong>(and if people carefully read their manuals there would be no controversy!).</p>
<p>Yours in tack sharp images&#8230;</p>
<p>Brad<br />
_<br />
Brad Hill<br />
Natural Art Images<br />
www.naturalart.ca</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/08/vr-on-a-tripod-its-even-more-complex-than-youd-think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D90 Films Porsche Race</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/08/d90-films-porsche-race/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/08/d90-films-porsche-race/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d90]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jello]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A D90 user films some porsches racing and yes, there appears to be some jello. Guess you&#8217;ll have to be very careful how you film things if you want to avoid the delicious fruity gel:
Jello:


No Jello- static shot:


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A D90 user films some porsches racing and yes, there appears to be some jello. Guess you&#8217;ll have to be very careful how you film things if you want to avoid the delicious fruity gel:<br />
Jello:<br />
<object width="400" height="278"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xQ4f4AgCnhs&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xQ4f4AgCnhs&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p><br/><br />
No Jello- static shot:<br />
<br/><br />
<object width="400" height="181"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZhudQxile1M&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0xe1600f&#038;color2=0xfebd01&#038;border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZhudQxile1M&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0xe1600f&#038;color2=0xfebd01&#038;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="445" height="284"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/08/d90-films-porsche-race/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You Know Who Else Doesn&#8217;t Like CaptureNX? Hitler Rants About D3x!</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/08/you-know-who-else-doesnt-like-capturenx-hitler-rants-about-d3x/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/08/you-know-who-else-doesnt-like-capturenx-hitler-rants-about-d3x/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d3x]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve resisted watching this for a few days, assuming that it was going to be really stupid. I guess that made an ass of me and me&#8230;
But the Fuhrer has some good points here:
Hilter Rants on D3x

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve resisted watching this for a few days, assuming that it was going to be really stupid. I guess that made an ass of me and me&#8230;</p>
<p>But the Fuhrer has some good points here:</p>
<p><a href="&lt;object width=\&quot;320\&quot; height=\&quot;265\&quot;&gt;&lt;param name=\&quot;movie\&quot; value=\&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/tnwf2RShNV0&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;color2=0xfebd01\&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name=\&quot;allowFullScreen\&quot; value=\&quot;true\&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name=\&quot;allowscriptaccess\&quot; value=\&quot;always\&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src=&quot;\&quot; mce_src=&quot;\&quot;&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/tnwf2RShNV0&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;color2=0xfebd01\&quot; type=\&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash\&quot; allowscriptaccess=\&quot;always\&quot; allowfullscreen=\&quot;true\&quot; width=\&quot;320\&quot; height=\&quot;265\&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;">Hilter Rants on D3x</a><br />
<object width="320" height="265"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/tnwf2RShNV0&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0xe1600f&#038;color2=0xfebd01"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/tnwf2RShNV0&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0xe1600f&#038;color2=0xfebd01" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="265"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/08/you-know-who-else-doesnt-like-capturenx-hitler-rants-about-d3x/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Tripod? VR OFF! Comparison Shots</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/07/on-tripod-vr-off-comparison-shots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/07/on-tripod-vr-off-comparison-shots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The manuals for VR lenses states that if you&#8217;ve got the lens on a tripod, you should turn VR off. I&#8217;ve read in various places that this is because of possible damage to the VR mechanism, but that&#8217;s generally regarded as BS. You&#8217;re also supposed to let the VR motors turn off before removing the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 85px"><img title="On tripod - VR OFF!" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/lensessmall.jpg" alt="On tripod - VR OFF!" width="75" height="128" /><p class="wp-caption-text">On tripod - VR OFF!</p></div>
<p>The manuals for VR lenses states that if you&#8217;ve got the lens on a tripod, you should turn VR off. I&#8217;ve read in various places that this is because of possible damage to the VR mechanism, but that&#8217;s generally regarded as BS. You&#8217;re also supposed to let the VR motors turn off before removing the lens, I doubt this too but haven&#8217;t seen anything authoritative.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;ve never tried test shots of a VR lens on a tripod with VR on vs off, <a href="http://dd-b.net/ddbcms/2008/12/vr-tests-pass-3-part-1/">but David Dyer-Bennet has</a> and we&#8217;re the better for it.</p>
<p>Check out his &#8216;on vs off&#8217; photos and <a href="http://dd-b.net/ddbcms/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/ddb-20081206-vr_test-130s-tpod-vr_on-1.jpg">it&#8217;s completely clear that the VR has to be turned off</a> if you&#8217;re on a tripod.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/07/on-tripod-vr-off-comparison-shots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More 50mm f/1.4g AF-S Sample Shots &#8211; They&#8217;re Shipping</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/06/another-50mm-f14g-af-s-sample-shot-theyre-shipping/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/06/another-50mm-f14g-af-s-sample-shot-theyre-shipping/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[af-s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A nice theatre shot here and here and here.
Shots of fruit here.
&#8230;i think the Contrast is a lot better, wide open than the old one was.
Shots of cats with the 50mm f/1.4g AF-S are currently scarce, but I expect to  see bunches landing any day now. blech. Ugh- 2 seconds after posting this, I find [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A nice <a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1030&amp;message=30254336">theatre shot here</a> and <a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1030&amp;message=30255160">here</a> and <a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1030&amp;message=30255446">here</a>.</p>
<p>Shots of fruit <a href="http://www.christian-fournier.com/my50mm/">here</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;i think the Contrast is a lot better, wide open than the old one was.</p></blockquote>
<p>Shots of cats with the 50mm f/1.4g AF-S are currently scarce, but I expect to  see bunches landing any day now. blech. Ugh- 2 seconds after posting this, <a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1030&amp;message=30261320">I find a dog thread</a>. Really- why can&#8217;t we take <a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&amp;message=30254436">pictures of hot chicks with new lenses</a>?</p>
<p>Comparisons between the older <a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&amp;message=30245634">AF-D and the new AF-S here</a>. Definitely better at f/1.4 provided the guy&#8217;s AF-D wasn&#8217;t a bad copy.</p>
<p>Since I only have the f/1.8, I wonder how they compare&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/06/another-50mm-f14g-af-s-sample-shot-theyre-shipping/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Early Reports on 50mm AF-S &#8212; SLOW?</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/06/early-reports-on-50mm-af-s-slow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/06/early-reports-on-50mm-af-s-slow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 17:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[af-s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m seeing ever-increasing noise from legitimate sources that the 50mm AF-S is not at quite the speed that we&#8217;re used to with other AF-S lenses:
Then I checked the new 50mm lens and while I like it, I don&#8217;t get one,
its really quite slow in acquiring AF even with the integrated Silent
Wave Motor&#8230;not much of a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m seeing ever-increasing noise from legitimate sources that the 50mm AF-S is not at quite the speed that we&#8217;re used to with other AF-S lenses:</p>
<blockquote><p><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/lensessmall.jpg" alt="" width="75" height="128" />Then I checked the <strong>new 50mm lens</strong> and while I like it, I don&#8217;t get one,<br />
<strong>its really quite slow in acquiring AF even with the integrated Silent<br />
Wave Motor</strong>&#8230;<em>not much of a difference to the old 50mm</em> f1.4 version</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s pretty interesting- other reports are that it&#8217;s relatively light for its size- one wonder if Nikon had to cut the budget a bit on the lens to get AF-S motors in there and still hit a reasonable price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/06/early-reports-on-50mm-af-s-slow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D3x + 50mm AF-S Samples from Pro Marcus Bell- Wow!</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/06/d3x-50mm-af-s-samples-from-pro-marcus-bell-wow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/06/d3x-50mm-af-s-samples-from-pro-marcus-bell-wow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 17:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d3x]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Studio Pro Marcus Bell shows us his new toy and gives us a fine example of my first law of photography- beautiful subjects (hot chicks) gives 80% of what you need to make anyone wants to see.
On the D3x:
As you will see with the images I have posted the clarity, sharpness, dynamic range is exceptional.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_918" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://www.studioimpressionsphotography.com/blog/2008/11/nikon-d3x-sample-images/"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-918" title="Nikon d3x studio samples - Marcus Bell" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/nikond3x_marcusbell_2-150x150.jpg" alt="Nikon D3X Studio Samples - Marcus Bell" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon D3X Studio Samples - Marcus Bell</p></div>
<p>Studio Pro Marcus Bell <a href="http://www.studioimpressionsphotography.com/blog/2008/11/nikon-d3x-sample-images/">shows us his new toy and gives us a fine example </a>of my first law of photography- <a href="http://www.studioimpressionsphotography.com/nikond3x/nikond3x_marcusbell_6.jpg">beautiful subjects (hot chicks) gives 80%</a> of what you need to make anyone wants to see.</p>
<p>On the D3x:</p>
<blockquote><p>As you will see with the images I have posted <strong>the clarity, sharpness, dynamic range is exceptional</strong>.  The images posted are <strong>direct from camera without any corrections whatsoever</strong>.  I can honestly say <strong>I would be happy to send the file to press without any post</strong> work.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>The specifications advise it is 5fps, but during the shoot <strong>the buffer never got full and there were times I was hammering it</strong>.</p></blockquote>
<p>Check the shot of the <a href="http://www.studioimpressionsphotography.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/nikond3x_marcusbell_6.jpg">model&#8217;s eye</a>- now imagine your favorite pr0n girl put under similar scrutiny&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/06/d3x-50mm-af-s-samples-from-pro-marcus-bell-wow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jeff-C&#8217;s D3x Sample Shots</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/02/jeff-cs-d3x-sample-shots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/02/jeff-cs-d3x-sample-shots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d3x]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeff-C has a good reputation on dpReview as frequently having credible information ahead of time. Now he&#8217;s got a D3x and has published some sample studio shots with it at various ISO&#8217;s here.
3200iso looks pretty good to me- no reason not to use it if you have to.
On the other hand, studio pro&#8217;s tend to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff-C has a good reputation on dpReview as frequently having credible information ahead of time. Now he&#8217;s got a D3x and has published <a href="http://www.fotoactualidad.com/2008/12/exclusive-jeff-cs-nikon-d3x-sample.html">some sample studio shots with it at various ISO&#8217;s here</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3048/3076830062_d825795160_o.jpg">3200iso looks pretty good</a> to me- no reason not to use it if you have to.</p>
<p>On the other hand, studio pro&#8217;s tend to have tons of money sunk into lighting, so the likelihood of them using 3200 is probably pretty damned low.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/12/02/jeff-cs-d3x-sample-shots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bjorn Has More Nikkor 50mm f/1.4g AF-S Samples</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/30/bjorn-has-more-nikkor-50mm-f14g-af-s-samples/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/30/bjorn-has-more-nikkor-50mm-f14g-af-s-samples/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 18:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[af-s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here. Also says it&#8217;s very sharp, with a usable f/1.4. 100% crops look good. He reports that the light falloff vs the 50mm AF-D is much better.
Oh- if you don&#8217;t see the shots, then create an account on his site and then login and view the page. I&#8217;ll not snipe his shots.
Also- vignette tests at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 85px"><img title="Nikon Nikkor 50mm af-s f/1.4g Samples" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/lensessmall.jpg" alt="Nikon Nikkor 50mm af-s f/1.4g Samples" width="75" height="128" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon Nikkor 50mm af-s f/1.4g Samples</p></div>
<p><a href="http://nikongear.com/smf/index.php?topic=12910.msg96707#msg96707">Here</a>. Also says it&#8217;s <strong>very</strong> sharp, with a usable f/1.4. 100% crops look good. He reports that the light falloff vs the 50mm AF-D is much better.</p>
<p>Oh- if you don&#8217;t see the shots, then create an account on his site and then login and view the page. I&#8217;ll not snipe his shots.</p>
<p>Also- vignette tests at <a href="http://nikongear.com/smf/index.php?topic=12962.0">various wide apertures here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/30/bjorn-has-more-nikkor-50mm-f14g-af-s-samples/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bjorn Reviews Nikkor 50mm f/1.4g AF-S- Likes It</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/28/bjorn-reviews-nikkor-50mm-f28g-af-s-likes-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/28/bjorn-reviews-nikkor-50mm-f28g-af-s-likes-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 21:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[af-s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Edit- Duh- it's the 1.4, not the 2.8, pardon me.]
Bjørn Rørslett is widely regarded as an authority on Nikkor lenses- the dude even alters the chips in his lenses and throws chips into lenses that didn&#8217;t have them before. For me, this qualifies you for LensGod status, so I take his opinions seriously.
He&#8217;s somehow gotten [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 85px"><img title="nikon nikkor 50mm f/1.4g AF-S review" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/lensessmall.jpg" alt="Nikon Nikkor 50mm f/1.4g AF-S review" width="75" height="128" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon Nikkor 50mm f/1.4g AF-S review</p></div>
<p>[Edit- Duh- it's the 1.4, not the 2.8, pardon me.]</p>
<p><a href="http://www.naturfotograf.com/">Bjørn Rørslett</a> is widely regarded as an authority on Nikkor lenses- the dude even alters the chips in his lenses and <a href="http://www.naturfotograf.com/lens_CPUconversion.html">throws chips into lenses that didn&#8217;t have them before</a>. For me, this qualifies you for LensGod status, so I take his opinions seriously.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s somehow <a href="http://www.naturfotograf.com/lens_norm.html">gotten ahold of a 50mm AF-S</a> (scroll down) and liked it:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;While the lens barrel does not extend during focusing, there is no internal focusing (IF) to work its magic (and sometimes, adding colour aberaations) &#8211; the inner unit moves back and forth as an entity. Thus, the <strong>autofocus operational speed won&#8217;t set a world record</strong>, but for most purposes it suffices well enough&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;The corner fall-off is visible when the lens is set to the widest apertures, but less annoying than seen with the earlier AF-D model. <strong>From f/2.8 onwards vignetting is negligible</strong>. The <strong>barel distortion, typical</strong> for this class of lens, is kept under good control&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;The new model is an evolution of the older lens, so<strong> you don&#8217;t need to rush out to purchase it </strong>unless you can only work with AFS, but <strong>anyone looking for an excellently performing normal lens should consider the &#8220;G&#8221; carefully</strong>&#8230;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/28/bjorn-reviews-nikkor-50mm-f28g-af-s-likes-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon EOS5DmkII &#8211; Sample Video Using Nikkor, Zeiss Lenses</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/24/canon-eos5dmkii-sample-video-using-nikkor-zeiss-lenses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/24/canon-eos5dmkii-sample-video-using-nikkor-zeiss-lenses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jello]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Say what you will about Canon, but this video taken with the EOS5D-mkII looks pretty good to my eyes- it&#8217;s even shot at night and I can&#8217;t see any particular noise or anything. It&#8217;s on a tripod, so there&#8217;re no jello shots.
It&#8217;ll be interesting to see if the D3x has video or when we&#8217;ll be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say what you will about Canon, <a href="http://www.vimeo.com/2327058">but this video taken with the EOS5D-mkII looks pretty good to my eyes</a>- it&#8217;s even shot at night and I can&#8217;t see any particular noise or anything. It&#8217;s on a tripod, so there&#8217;re no jello shots.</p>
<p>It&#8217;ll be interesting to see if the D3x has video or when we&#8217;ll be seeing a top of the line Nikon body with video.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to see the same thing compared against the drool-inducing 85mm f/1.2.<br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="400" height="225" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=2327058&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="225" src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=2327058&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
<a href="http://vimeo.com/2327058">Canon EOS5DmkII, One night in Beijing.</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/user331735">Dan Chung</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/24/canon-eos5dmkii-sample-video-using-nikkor-zeiss-lenses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red Corp, &#8220;We got your modular digital Nikon body right here. Choke on it!&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/15/red-corp-we-got-your-modular-digital-nikon-body-right-here-choke-on-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/15/red-corp-we-got-your-modular-digital-nikon-body-right-here-choke-on-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 21:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[modular body]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scarlet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Red finally came out with details on their Digital Stills and Motion Camera (DSMC, as opposed to DSLR) cameras. How long has the &#8220;modular&#8221; Nikon body rumor been around? I&#8217;ve even seen reports from pro&#8217;s saying that the thing actually exists, but Nikon keeps it under wraps. What a shame we don&#8217;t see things like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Red finally came out with <a href="http://www.red.com/epic_scarlet/">details on their Digital Stills and Motion Camera </a>(DSMC, as opposed to DSLR) cameras. <strong>How long has the &#8220;modular&#8221; Nikon body rumor been around?</strong> I&#8217;ve even seen reports from pro&#8217;s saying that the thing actually exists, but Nikon keeps it under wraps. What a shame we don&#8217;t see things like this coming out of the Nikon labs! <strong>Hopefully this will kick Nikon in the butt and we&#8217;ll get something like it</strong>- I would love to see a replaceable sensor instead of having to buy a new body every 2 years to get the best image quality.</p>
<div id="attachment_840" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/scarlet-page2.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-840" title="scarlet-page2" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/scarlet-page2-300x296.jpg" alt="Red Scarlet Modular Body- 1 possible configuration" width="300" height="296" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Red Scarlet Modular Body- 1 possible configuration</p></div>
<p>This shot simply shows <strong>a possible configuration</strong>- <strong><em>7 different sensor backs</em></strong> you can choose from depending on the mount, sensor size, FPS! There&#8217;ll even be (presumably, this won&#8217;t be vaporware) a 28kMP back that does 25fps in 2010.</p>
<p>Oh hey! Notice something else we don&#8217;t see in the camera companies- <em><strong>a F&#8217;ING CLUE about what they&#8217;re likely to bring out in the future- Red&#8217;s actually establishing a baseline roadmap</strong></em> for what they expect to achieve in 2 years!</p>
<p>Want to see the rest of the images that you can attach to this camera?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/redmodule-page8.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-841" title="Red - The Full DSMC with All Accessories" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/redmodule-page8.jpg" alt="" width="396" height="400" /></a></p>
<p>So- to get a <strong>minimal</strong> Nikon F-mount-based system, you&#8217;re looking at:</p>
<p>Scarlet 5k/39fps @ <strong>$7,000</strong></p>
<p>Red Handle @ ?</p>
<p>Lens Mount @ ?</p>
<p>Battery @ ?</p>
<p>Electronic Viewfinder @ ?</p>
<p>Recording Module @ ?</p>
<p>Then what you <strong>still don&#8217;t have is autofocus</strong>, so I hope you&#8217;re good at that!</p>
<p>If you want a <strong>FF 35mm sensor, you&#8217;re going to shell out $12k</strong>.</p>
<p>Then because all of this dreamy tech wasn&#8217;t enough,<strong> they decided to cobble together a 3d setup</strong>:</p>
<div id="attachment_842" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 410px"><a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/scarlet3dpage15.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-842" title="scarlet3dpage15" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/scarlet3dpage15.jpg" alt="3d Scarlet Setup" width="400" height="260" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">3d Scarlet Setup</p></div>
<p>If I didn&#8217;t already have a ton of cash invested in Nikon- this would leave my wondering if investing in Red gear wasn&#8217;t the way to go- the fact that they&#8217;re able to come out of virtually nowhere a couple of years ago and even have the audacity products like this tells me they&#8217;re not going to sit on their asses while people keep begging to buy things like new AF-S primes, updated 70-200mm, Apheric 28 f/1.4, another Noct, etc.</p>
<p>If I was Nikon, I&#8217;d change my pants, then ask how much cash we had on hand and maybe make them an offer. Failing that, I&#8217;d be dusting off all those cool ideas we&#8217;ve been playing with but not actually seriously considering making into a product, and <strong>taking some risks</strong>!</p>
<p>After all of that was done, I&#8217;d have an extremely frank and open discussion with our customers explaining where we&#8217;re going over the next years, produce a truthful product roadmap, and set some audacious R&amp;D goals.</p>
<p>If I was Red, I&#8217;d figure out how to get autofocus in there- but I&#8217;m not a motion guy, maybe it&#8217;s not as useful as I&#8217;d think. I&#8217;d also think about heavily targeting still photographers as soon as the motion guys are satiated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/15/red-corp-we-got-your-modular-digital-nikon-body-right-here-choke-on-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interesting Inside Baseball on Nikon Instant Rebates</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/09/interesting-inside-baseball-on-nikon-instant-rebates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/09/interesting-inside-baseball-on-nikon-instant-rebates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 16:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thom&#8217;s got a nice article about Nikon&#8217;s current instant rebate policy and how its complexity is making it harder to compare prices between retailers. Also interesting (to me anyway), that it appears that Nikon takes 60+ days to give the rebated money back to the retailer- thus effectively costing the retailer interest during that period. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thom&#8217;s got a nice article about <a href="http://www.bythom.com/">Nikon&#8217;s current instant rebate policy</a> and how its complexity is making it harder to compare prices between retailers. Also interesting (to me anyway), that it appears that Nikon takes 60+ days to give the rebated money back to the retailer- thus effectively costing the retailer interest during that period. <a href="http://www.bankrate.com/">If you&#8217;ve checked the (US) interest rates lately</a>, you&#8217;ll see how this is not a really good thing for our retailers.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: x-small;">Surprisingly, I&#8217;ve heard from a lot of dealers. I can tell you that they don&#8217;t like this new Nikon rebate program. They pay for stuff up front, sell it to you for a discount imposed by Nikon, apparently have to participate in an advertising program to get the rebates, t<strong>hen have to file absolutely pristine paperwork to get their share of the rebate back (they don&#8217;t get US$300) in 60 days or more. </strong>Essentially, <strong>NikonUSA is getting a loan from your dealer, and at good terms</strong>. Given the economy at the moment, putting monetary pressure on dealers is not a smart thing for a manufacturer to do. The manufacturer just might find they have fewer dealers and lower volume when all is said and done.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/09/interesting-inside-baseball-on-nikon-instant-rebates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New 70-200mm? No- Nothing Credible.</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/02/new-70-200mm-no-nothing-credible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/02/new-70-200mm-no-nothing-credible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 17:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antirumor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a public service- there are absolutely no credible rumors of a new 70-200mm with or without Nano coating, with or without VR2.
Carry on.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a public service- there are absolutely no credible rumors of a new 70-200mm with or without Nano coating, with or without VR2.</p>
<p>Carry on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/02/new-70-200mm-no-nothing-credible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photography Blog Reviews Nikon Coolpix P6000 P&amp;S</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/01/photography-blog-reviews-nikon-coolpix-p6000-ps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/01/photography-blog-reviews-nikon-coolpix-p6000-ps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 21:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p&s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p6000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conclusion? Noisier than a Hoover, equally capable of driving my dog nuts&#8211; and:
GPS functionality is well-implemented, but only works sporadically in urban environments and not all all indoors, and it has a significant drain on battery life unless you keep turning it on and off. LAN connectivity is limited to merely uploading pictures to Nikon&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/hoover.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-828" style="margin: 2px;" title="hoover" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/hoover.jpg" alt="" width="100" height="99" /></a><a href="http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews_nikon_coolpix_p6000_6.php">Conclusion? Noisier than a Hoover</a>, equally capable of driving my dog nuts&#8211; and:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;"><strong>GPS functionality is well-implemented, but only works sporadically in urban environments</strong> and not all all indoors, and it has a <strong>significant drain on battery life</strong> unless you keep turning it on and off. <strong>LAN connectivity is limited to merely uploading pictures to Nikon&#8217;s My PictureTown online gallery</strong>, and <strong>RAW support is plagued by slow processing times</strong> and no continuous shooting mode at all.</p>
<p>Well it&#8217;s a point and shoot, so suprise, and if it was much more expensive, you&#8217;d be into SLR territory.</p>
<p>Samples are here, and I have to say that <a href="http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews_nikon_coolpix_p6000_3.php">this isn&#8217;t Nikon&#8217;s best work</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/11/01/photography-blog-reviews-nikon-coolpix-p6000-ps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon / Nikkor 50mm AF-S f/1.4g Samples!</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/10/29/nikon-nikkor-50mm-af-s-f14g-samples/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/10/29/nikon-nikkor-50mm-af-s-f14g-samples/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 02:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vilhelm got to attend an NPS event and play with lenses that cost more than old Porsches and also the new (low-cost) Nikkor 50mm AF-S f/1.4g lens and managed to take a few shots.
Unfortunately, there&#8217;s just no way to get a sense of how good the lens is from these shots. Some are saying (from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_825" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/50mmafssample1.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-825" title="nikon 50mm af-s f/1.4g sample" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/50mmafssample1-150x150.jpg" alt="nikon 50mm af-s f/1.4g sample" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon 50mm af-s f/1.4g sample</p></div>
<p>Vilhelm got to attend an NPS event and play with lenses that cost more than old Porsches and also the new (low-cost) Nikkor 50mm AF-S f/1.4g lens and <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mureena/2982034950/in/set-72157608455508175/">managed to take a few shots</a>.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, there&#8217;s just no way to get a sense of how good the lens is from these shots. Some are saying (from these shots alone!) that the bokeh isn&#8217;t too hot, that there&#8217;s some CA,etc. I suggest we tell them to take a chill pill until we get our hands on some real copies to play with.</p>
<p>Shots like these really make one wonder WTF Nikon is thinking. The lens has been announced, presumably, it&#8217;s released in its final form and being manufactured- WTF don&#8217;t we get a slew of samples from Nikon themselves so we can avoid the pointless speculation by idiots like me about how good the lenses perform?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=50mm+af-s&amp;w=all&amp;m=&amp;s=&amp;mt=&amp;x=&amp;y=">Searching Flickr for 50mm af-s</a> also gets us some other shots (of the lens itself, mostly).</p>
<p>However, <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/parisnumerique/2930203254/">this claims to be</a> from the 50mm af-s on the D3, homemade <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jananneo/2893226502/">shot of the lens itself</a>,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/10/29/nikon-nikkor-50mm-af-s-f14g-samples/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D90 Video Review by CamCorderInfo.com</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/10/25/nikon-d90-video-review-by-camcordinfocom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/10/25/nikon-d90-video-review-by-camcordinfocom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 01:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d90]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jello]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, she ain&#8217;t a dedicated HD video camera, but she actually does pretty well against real video-only cameras if you don&#8217;t wobble the camera too much while you&#8217;re shooting.

If you can get past the ads between every page, you&#8217;ll eventually come to the conclusion- and keep in mind, these are video dorks, not stills-dork (like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, she ain&#8217;t a dedicated HD video camera, but she actually does pretty well against real video-only cameras if you don&#8217;t wobble the camera too much while you&#8217;re shooting.<br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/t0i5rmwPPNQ&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/t0i5rmwPPNQ&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p><a href="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/Nikon-D90-DSLR-Camera-Review-35626.htm">If you can get past the ads between every page</a>, you&#8217;ll eventually come to the conclusion- and keep in mind, these are video dorks, not stills-dork (like me):</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Comparing the Nikon D90 to HD camcorders may be unfair</strong>, but, being the first of its kind, its the only product we could put it up against. <strong>The Canon EOS 5D Mark II, the second SLR to record video, has impressive specs—a 1920 x 1080 video quality, stereo microphone input, and an H.264 video compression codec.</strong> The question will be, would you rather pay $999.95 ($1299.95 with the lens) to play around with video on the Nikon D90, or shell out $1700 more to get your hands on the Canon? Then, of course, you need to question whether a first generation product is ever a good investment. Stay skeptical.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/10/25/nikon-d90-video-review-by-camcordinfocom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony a900 Noise vs Nikon D700 vs Canon EOS 5d vs EOS 1DS Mark III</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/10/22/sony-a900-noise-vs-nikon-d700-vs-canon-eos-5d-vs-eos-1ds-mark-iii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/10/22/sony-a900-noise-vs-nikon-d700-vs-canon-eos-5d-vs-eos-1ds-mark-iii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eos 1ds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eos 5d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dpReview posts a nice review of the Sony a900 and includes a wad of shots for comparison at the different ISO&#8217;s from 50-6400. But come on, it&#8217;s unfair to compare the D3/D700 sensor to anything else at high iso!
And while Sony&#8217;s clearly kicking ass and taking names in the megapixel race, it still isn&#8217;t up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dpReview posts a <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sonydslra900/">nice review of the Sony a900</a> and includes a <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sonydslra900/page20.asp">wad of shots for comparison at the different ISO&#8217;s from 50-6400</a>. But come on, it&#8217;s unfair to compare the D3/D700 sensor to anything else at high iso!</p>
<p>And while Sony&#8217;s clearly kicking ass and taking names in the megapixel race, it still isn&#8217;t up to the competition provided by the Dynamic Duo- Nikon and Canon.</p>
<div id="attachment_804" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 150px"><a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/sonya900_nm_iso6400_crop.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-804" title="sonya900_nm_iso6400_crop" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/sonya900_nm_iso6400_crop.jpg" alt="Sony a900 @ 6400iso" width="140" height="210" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Sony a900 @ 6400iso</p></div>
<div id="attachment_805" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 150px"><a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/nikond700_nfnormiso6400_crop.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-805" title="nikond700_nfnormiso6400_crop" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/nikond700_nfnormiso6400_crop.jpg" alt="Nikon d700 @ 6400iso" width="140" height="210" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon d700 @ 6400iso</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/10/22/sony-a900-noise-vs-nikon-d700-vs-canon-eos-5d-vs-eos-1ds-mark-iii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PC-E (Tilt/Shift) Nikkors In Stock!</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/10/18/pc-e-tilstshift-nikkors-in-stock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/10/18/pc-e-tilstshift-nikkors-in-stock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 00:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pc-e]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been looking at getting a PC-E lens recently and they&#8217;ve been a bitch to find in stock.
Nikon tends to make the more advanced lenses in small batches- so when you see them, you want to JUMP on them (or wait 3-6 months sometimes- good luck finding a 200mm f/2, for example).
But right now, BHPhotoVideo [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been looking at getting a PC-E lens recently and they&#8217;ve been a bitch to find in stock.</p>
<p>Nikon tends to make the more advanced lenses in small batches- so when you see them, you want to JUMP on them (or wait 3-6 months sometimes- good luck finding a 200mm f/2, for example).</p>
<p>But right now, BHPhotoVideo (one of the few very reputable, large resellers) has the <strong>85mm in stock</strong> for <span class="value">$1,739.95. </span></p>
<p>If you like this site, and you&#8217;d like to buy one and throw me a couple of bucks, do me a favor and click on the this picture below, then buy it and I&#8217;ll get a tiny cut:<a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com?BI=1474&amp;KW=BANNER1&amp;KBID=1987&amp;img=bh_wl.gif"><br />
<img src="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/images/affiliateimages/bh_wl.gif" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
<img src="http://affiliates.bhphotovideo.com/showban.asp?id=1987&amp;img=bh_wl.gif" border="0" alt="" /></p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t want the 85mm (I&#8217;m looking at the 24mm), then Calumet Photo (also reputable, but I prefer B&amp;H and their lower prices and better service) has the 24mm for $1,899.99  and the 85mm for $1,949.99. <a href="http://www.calumetphoto.com/ctl?ac.ui.pn=search.Search&amp;query=pc-e&amp;x=0&amp;y=0">They&#8217;re both currently in stock</a> (according to their system) but it&#8217;ll cost you more than you&#8217;d pay at B&amp;H. The 45mm is marked as out of stock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/10/18/pc-e-tilstshift-nikkors-in-stock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon Survey?</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/10/18/nikon-survey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/10/18/nikon-survey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 23:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently, Nikon has been sending out messages to various people asking them to take a survey:
It was a pretty nice survey.  It got a bit weird at the end with the Myers-briggs mini-test, and the &#8220;what does the D3 make you think?&#8221; Round and Playful definitely what come to mind when I think of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, Nikon has been sending out messages to various people asking them to take a survey:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">It was a pretty nice <span class="nfakPe">survey</span>.  It got a bit weird at the end with the Myers-briggs mini-test, and the &#8220;what does the D3 make you think?&#8221; Round and Playful definitely what come to mind when I think of the D3. (?)</p>
<p>Wonder what else is on there- it didn&#8217;t seem to have any interesting questions on it since there&#8217;s been only a tiny bit of chatter about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/10/18/nikon-survey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Capture NX &#8211; Further Woes</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/10/18/capture-nx-further-woes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/10/18/capture-nx-further-woes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 23:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capture nx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just keep reading down the page if you don&#8217;t care about Capture NX.
Capture NX Gripes
Install Count Limits
I&#8217;m a software developer- I get machines and reinstall my OS on a rather regular basis. Each time I do this, I reinstall Capture NX &#8211; the last time, it told me that my key was invalid (it&#8217;s not). [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just keep reading down the page if you don&#8217;t care about Capture NX.</p>
<div id="attachment_785" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 410px"><a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/angryface.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-785" title="angryface" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/angryface.jpg" alt="Nikon Capture NX brings out the angry boy in me" width="400" height="266" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon Capture NX brings out the angry boy in me</p></div>
<h2><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Capture NX Gripes</strong></span></h2>
<p><strong>Install Count Limits</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;m a software developer- I get machines and reinstall my OS on a rather regular basis. Each time I do this, I reinstall Capture NX &#8211; the last time, it told me that my key was invalid (it&#8217;s not). I presume that I&#8217;ve hit the install count maximum.</p>
<p>This pisses me off. Over the course of the 2 years (or so) that I&#8217;ve had it, it&#8217;s been on 2 different machine and about 4-5 different OS installs.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve paid for it and I shouldn&#8217;t be treated like a pirate just because I reinstall my OS or upgrade my machines. I&#8217;m actually more of a Ninja anyway.</p>
<p><strong>Version Checks During Install</strong></p>
<p>I installed NX2 since I couldn&#8217;t get NX1 to activate. Then NX2 expires and I realized that I got a copy of V1 with my D3. So I try and install that only to get an error telling me that a newer version had already been installed on my system! Right- I had installed NX2 and I&#8217;d also run the <strong>UNINSTALL </strong>before trying V1.</p>
<p>Turns out that the only way to reinstall V1 was to <strong>nuke \program files\nikon\*</strong> and <em>ALSO </em>nuke <strong>\Program Files\Common Files\Nikon\*</strong> . Then I could finally install it.</p>
<p><strong>Faster vs Better</strong></p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t buy a fast machine and a D3 with nearly $2000 lenses because I wanted low-quality shots. For some reason- there are several areas where you can choose between Fast and Better quality. Why can&#8217;t I set it up for best quality all the time?</p>
<h2><span><strong><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Capture NX Attaboys</strong></span></strong></span></h2>
<p><strong>Online Key Purchase</strong></p>
<p>You can buy the activation keys online (despite what I&#8217;ve seen on some forums). I put in my credit card, bought the upgrade to V2 and the activation key worked.</p>
<h2><span><strong><span><strong><span><strong><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Capture NX Misc</strong></span></strong></span></strong></span></strong></span></h2>
<p><strong> 30&#8243; Monitors Are Crucial!</strong></p>
<p>This sounds stupid- <strong>and it is</strong>, but a 30&#8243; monitor at 2560&#215;1600 is finally just about big enough to have most of the tool windows (contrast, Camera corrections, etc) on my screen and see my shots big enough to edit them without having to move stuff around or reduce the size of the image.</p>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"></h2>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #ff0000;">How would you improve NX?</span></h2>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/10/18/capture-nx-further-woes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>dpReviews Reviews the Nikon D90</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/10/13/dpreviews-reviews-the-nikon-d90/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/10/13/dpreviews-reviews-the-nikon-d90/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d80]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d90]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dpReview has checked out the D90 and gives you a 37 page review! They give a nice comparison to the d80, and overall appear to like it. Surprise.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 410px"><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond90/"><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/d90realsmallwithgps.jpg" alt="Nikon D90 Review" width="400" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon D90 Review</p></div>
<p>dpReview has checked out the D90 and <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond90/">gives you a 37 page review</a>! They give a nice comparison to the d80, and overall appear to like it. Surprise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/10/13/dpreviews-reviews-the-nikon-d90/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vista 64bit- Get Your NEF Previews Back in Explorer!</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/10/08/vista-64bit-get-your-nef-previews-back-in-explorer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/10/08/vista-64bit-get-your-nef-previews-back-in-explorer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 03:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nef]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone not running Vista 64 bit can totally ignore this post.
Top .5% and developers still here? Ok- we all know Nikon&#8217;s using a 32bit shell extension in order to show the preview thumbnails in Explorer when you select View and the icon sizes (like &#8220;Large&#8221;).
Unfortunately, 64bit Explorer can&#8217;t use 32bit shell extensions (what happened to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone not running Vista 64 bit can totally ignore this post.</p>
<p>Top .5% and developers still here? Ok- we all know Nikon&#8217;s using a 32bit shell extension in order to show the preview thumbnails in Explorer when you select View and the icon sizes (like &#8220;Large&#8221;).</p>
<p>Unfortunately, 64bit Explorer can&#8217;t use 32bit shell extensions (what happened to thunking?) so can&#8217;t show anything but the NEF-associated icon itself. But I came across a post that said that we can launch the 32bit explorer like this:</p>
<p>%windir%\SysWOW64\explorer /separate</p>
<p>and heck if I didn&#8217;t get my previews back!</p>
<p>[Edited for typos- <strong>MUST </strong>stop posting near midnight...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/10/08/vista-64bit-get-your-nef-previews-back-in-explorer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D90 Unboxing Shots!</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/10/03/d90-unboxing-shots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/10/03/d90-unboxing-shots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 01:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[18-105mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d90]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unboxing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you like really blurry shots of equipment taken by amateurs with point and shoots? Really?
Well tell me this- do you like close-up shots of the intimate of kit lenses? Really? Ok, well here you go (Engadget):
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you like really blurry shots of equipment taken by amateurs with point and shoots? Really?</p>
<p>Well tell me this- do you like close-up shots of the intimate of kit lenses? Really? Ok, well here you go (Engadget):</p>
<div id="attachment_756" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/nikon-d90-unboxing-and-hands-on/1076070/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-756" title="100308-nikon-d90-hands-on-14" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/100308-nikon-d90-hands-on-14-300x225.jpg" alt="Nikon D90 unboxing and nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6g kit lens" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon D90 unboxing and nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6g kit lens</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/10/03/d90-unboxing-shots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/25mm ZF vs Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G ED AF-S</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/30/carl-zeiss-distagon-t-2825mm-zf-vs-nikon-24-70mm-f28g-ed-af-s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/30/carl-zeiss-distagon-t-2825mm-zf-vs-nikon-24-70mm-f28g-ed-af-s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 20:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zeiss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark Cargill has thrown together a comparison of the Zeiss 25mm and the Nikon 24-70mm.
Despite my love for Zeiss lenses, I like the color on the Nikkor, however there&#8217;s less distortion on the Zeiss- as you&#8217;d expect with a prime, but the Nikon definitely looks sharper to my eyes at 100%.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Cargill has thrown together <a href="http://www.markcargill.co.uk/pages/zeiss-25mm-and-nikon-24-70mm-lens-tests.php">a comparison of the Zeiss 25mm and the Nikon 24-70mm</a>.</p>
<p>Despite my love for Zeiss lenses, I like the color on the Nikkor, however there&#8217;s less distortion on the Zeiss- as you&#8217;d expect with a prime, but the Nikon definitely looks sharper to my eyes at 100%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/30/carl-zeiss-distagon-t-2825mm-zf-vs-nikon-24-70mm-f28g-ed-af-s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D90 Jello Shots- Technical Explanations- CCD vs CMOS</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/28/d90-jello-shots-technical-explanations-ccd-vs-cmos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/28/d90-jello-shots-technical-explanations-ccd-vs-cmos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jello]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Update: due to popular demand, I've added the picture. If this gets me in trouble, for some reason, it your bastards' faults!]
Here&#8217;s a great article on why we&#8217;re seeing deliciously wobbly jello shots in movie mode on various SLR&#8217;s.
I was going to include this picture (mildy racy) to illustrate this story, but decided against it. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[<strong>Update: </strong>due to popular demand, I've added the picture. If this gets me in trouble, for some reason, it your bastards' faults!]</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img title="D90 Jello-Shots!" src="http://scanned.files.wordpress.com/2007/12/jelloshot.jpg" alt="D90 Jello-Shots!" width="500" height="375" /><p class="wp-caption-text">D90 Jello-Shots!</p></div>
<p><a href="http://dvxuser.com/jason/CMOS-CCD/">Here&#8217;s a great article</a> on why we&#8217;re seeing deliciously wobbly jello shots in movie mode on various SLR&#8217;s.</p>
<p>I was <a href="http://scanned.files.wordpress.com/2007/12/jelloshot.jpg">going to include this picture (mildy racy)</a> to illustrate this story, but decided against it. Leave a comment if I didn&#8217;t make the right choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/28/d90-jello-shots-technical-explanations-ccd-vs-cmos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy 75th Birthday, Nikon! (Last Monday, Sept 22, 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/28/happy-75th-birthday-nikon-last-monday-sept-22-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/28/happy-75th-birthday-nikon-last-monday-sept-22-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 15:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The old girl sure isn&#8217;t acting her age lately!
Let&#8217;s make it another 75!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The old girl sure isn&#8217;t acting her age lately!</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s make it another 75!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/28/happy-75th-birthday-nikon-last-monday-sept-22-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikkor 50mm AF-S f/1.4g MTF Chart</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/28/nikkor-50mm-af-s-f14g-mtf-chart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/28/nikkor-50mm-af-s-f14g-mtf-chart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 15:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nikon has put out the MTF chart and the related technical data for the new 50mm AF-S f/1.4g here.
Unfortunately, to my knowledge, we don&#8217;t have any test shots.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_743" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 200px"><a href="http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/lens/af/normal/af-s_50mmf_14g/index.htm"><img class="size-full wp-image-743" title="nikon 50mm af-s mtf" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/50mmafsmtf.jpg" alt="Nikkor 50mm AF-S MTF Chart" width="190" height="153" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikkor 50mm AF-S MTF Chart</p></div>
<p>Nikon has put out the MTF chart and the related <a href="http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/lens/af/normal/af-s_50mmf_14g/index.htm">technical data for the new 50mm AF-S f/1.4g here</a>.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, to my knowledge, we don&#8217;t have any test shots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/28/nikkor-50mm-af-s-f14g-mtf-chart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D60 &#8211; Special Gold Edition &#8211; $50 More</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/26/735/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/26/735/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 21:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d60]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hate to be ghetto twice in a row, but you have to admit it&#8217;s warranted:
Makes me think of:

Get more info and see more pictures here.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate to be ghetto twice in a row, but you have to admit it&#8217;s warranted:</p>
<div id="attachment_736" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 410px"><a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/d60gold1.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-736" title="nikon d60 gold edition" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/d60gold1.jpg" alt="Nikon D60 Gold (Grillz) Edition" width="400" height="231" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon D60 Gold (Grillz) Edition</p></div>
<p>Makes me think of:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/grillz.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-737" title="grillz" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/grillz.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="315" /></a></p>
<p>Get more info and see <a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1034&amp;thread=29481677">more pictures here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/26/735/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hassy Be Rollin&#8217; 60mp, Son! 2009.</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/24/hassy-be-rollin-60mp-fool-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/24/hassy-be-rollin-60mp-fool-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[500cm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hasselblad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medium Format]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PCWorld (huh?) reports that Hasselblad CEO Christian Poulsen says they&#8217;ve got a 60 megapixel  H3DII-60 that yields 94% fullframe coverage on their 645 format.

&#8220;We feel that it&#8217;s important to emphasize the 94% coverage, because, although we hear the phrase &#8216;full-frame&#8217; being used quite frequently, no manufacturer has yet achieved true medium format full-frame,&#8221; said [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="hasselblad 60 mp megapixel" href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/151466/hasselblad_camera.html?tk=rss_news">PCWorld (huh?) reports</a> that Hasselblad CEO Christian Poulsen says they&#8217;ve got a 60 megapixel  H3DII-60 that yields 94% fullframe coverage on their 645 format.</p>
<blockquote>
<div id="attachment_726" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/500cm.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-726" title="500cm" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/500cm.jpg" alt="Hasselblad 500cm" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Hasselblad 500cm</p></div>
<p>&#8220;We feel that it&#8217;s important to emphasize the 94% coverage, because, although we hear the phrase &#8216;full-frame&#8217; being used quite frequently, no manufacturer has yet achieved true medium format full-frame,&#8221; said Poulson at the huge German photokina show.</p></blockquote>
<p>My <a title="hasselblad 500cm" href="http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&amp;q=500cm&amp;btnG=Search+Images&amp;gbv=2">500cm</a>, dejected, weeps on the corner. &#8220;Don&#8217;t worry little 500cm, you&#8217;re still the only Hasselblad <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">I can afford</span> I&#8217;ll ever love. We&#8217;ll be together as long as they&#8217;re making Provia 120, 100iso.&#8221; (I&#8217;m not very romantic&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/24/hassy-be-rollin-60mp-fool-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D90 Movies Look Like Jello! Oh No!</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/23/d90-movies-look-like-jello-oh-no/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/23/d90-movies-look-like-jello-oh-no/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d90]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jello]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nikon D90 movies are getting out and we&#8217;re starting to see how they handle real-world situations, and I don&#8217;t mean during earthquakes! But viewing the footage below, you&#8217;d think that house was made out of jello and St. Andreas was happy that day.
If you  have a D90, I&#8217;m guessing that you&#8217;re going to want to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikon D90 movies are getting out and we&#8217;re starting to see how they handle real-world situations, and I don&#8217;t mean during earthquakes! But viewing the footage below, you&#8217;d think that house was made out of jello and St. Andreas was happy that day.</p>
<p>If you  have a D90, I&#8217;m guessing that you&#8217;re going to want to use a tripod and I&#8217;m also very curious as to how quickly moving subjects are going to show up.</p>
<p>If this &#8220;jello&#8221; effect is common, then movie mode isn&#8217;t going to be too useful.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read that Canon has similar problems, I&#8217;ll try and get some examples for you.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="400" height="322" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://s477.photobucket.com/flash/player.swf?file=http://vid477.photobucket.com/albums/rr134/jamesmel9/DSC_0012.flv" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="322" src="http://s477.photobucket.com/flash/player.swf?file=http://vid477.photobucket.com/albums/rr134/jamesmel9/DSC_0012.flv" wmode="transparent"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/23/d90-movies-look-like-jello-oh-no/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Zeiss ZF 18mm Wide Angle Lens on D3</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/18/review-zeiss-zf-18mm-wide-angle-lens-on-d3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/18/review-zeiss-zf-18mm-wide-angle-lens-on-d3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zeiss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a real soft spot in my heart for Zeiss lenses. It all started when I went from a Minolta 650si with CRAP Sigma kit zooms to a used Hasselblad 500cm with the 80mm Zeiss kit lens.
The difference in image quality was astonishing- I&#8217;d finally tasted (arguably) the best image quality cameras had to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a real soft spot in my heart for Zeiss lenses. It all started when I went from a Minolta 650si with CRAP Sigma kit zooms to a used Hasselblad 500cm with the 80mm Zeiss kit lens.</p>
<p>The difference in image quality was <strong>astonishing</strong>- I&#8217;d finally tasted (arguably) the best image quality cameras had to offer and I <strong>wasn&#8217;t</strong> going back.</p>
<p>The difference in image quality between Nikon&#8217;s pro lenses and the ZF (manual focus) lenses is not anywhere near as large as I&#8217;d seen years ago but I still love the lenses.</p>
<p>The focusing is wonderfully damped, they feel great, they look fantastic and they take great shots. The only thing I can knock them for is their price- the 50mm will set you back ~$5-600, and when they initially came out (when I bought my first), it was $800 wired to Germany to get the 50mm.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got a 50mm and a 35mm and Zeiss has now come out with the 18mm wide-angle. It&#8217;s got a HUGE 82mm filter size to make sure that you don&#8217;t chop off part of the image.</p>
<p>Nikkors are tools, Zess lenses are mechanical objet d&#8217;art- at least for me.</p>
<p>Click <a title="d3 zeiss 18mm lens review" href="http://www.nikoncamerauser.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=269">here to read D3Guy&#8217;s review</a> of the lens with sample shots.</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 410px"><img title="nikon d3 zeiss 18mm wideangle wide angle lens" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/zeiss18mm.jpg" alt="Zeiss 18mm WA on Nikon D3" width="400" height="225" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Zeiss 18mm WA on Nikon D3</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/18/review-zeiss-zf-18mm-wide-angle-lens-on-d3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D90 In-store Unboxing</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/06/nikon-d90-in-store-unboxing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/06/nikon-d90-in-store-unboxing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 00:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d90]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unboxing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
If you&#8217;re interested, here&#8217;re some shots of the D90 and kit-lens being shown in the store.
Not very interesting- appears to have been shot with a camera phone&#8230;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter" title="d90 unboxing" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/d90realsmallwithgps.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="300" /></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re interested, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/d90-unboxed-in-semi-secretive-fashion/1021525/">here&#8217;re some shots of the D90 and kit-lens</a> being shown in the store.</p>
<p>Not very interesting- appears to have been shot with a camera phone&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/06/nikon-d90-in-store-unboxing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D3 High-Speed Shutter Animation</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/06/nikon-d3-high-speed-shutter-animation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/06/nikon-d3-high-speed-shutter-animation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 22:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[af]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Update: my mistake, I did mean "secondary mirror", not shutter.]
Wow! If you haven&#8217;t seen this great animation by Jeffrey Friedl’s of shots taken by Marianne Oelund, you&#8217;re really missing out (click to go to the animation):

Ok, I&#8217;ll admit my ignorance, I had no idea that we had a secondary mirror in order to give the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[Update: my mistake, I did mean "secondary <strong>mirror</strong>", not shutter.]</p>
<p>Wow! If you haven&#8217;t seen this great animation by <span class="blogname">Jeffrey Friedl’s of shots taken by </span>Marianne Oelund, you&#8217;re really missing out (click to go to the animation):</p>
<p><a title="d3 highspeed shutter animation" href="http://regex.info/blog/2008-09-04/925"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-655" title="d3 high-speed shutter animation" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/d3shutteranimation.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="296" /></a></p>
<p>Ok, I&#8217;ll admit my ignorance, I had no idea that we had a secondary mirror in order to <span style="text-decoration: line-through;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autofocus#Passive_autofocus">give the AF module some parallax</a> to work with</span> give the AF system more light.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve altered the image so that the green part is the secondary shutter and the red part is the primary shutter (which has been partially flipped up).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/06/nikon-d3-high-speed-shutter-animation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon Wine?</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/06/nikon-wine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/06/nikon-wine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 18:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[X points me to this very strange promotion that Nikon made a few years ago.
Reminds me of that old Python sketch: &#8220;This is a bottle with a message in, and the message is &#8216;beware&#8217;. This is not a wine for drinking, this is a wine for laying down and avoiding.&#8220;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>X points me to this <a title="nikon wine" href="http://homepage2.nifty.com/akiyanroom/redbook-e/items/nikonwine.html">very strange promotion</a> that Nikon made a few years ago.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 410px"><img title="nikon wine" src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/nikonwine.jpg" alt="nikon wine" width="400" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">nikon wine</p></div>
<p>Reminds me of that old Python sketch: &#8220;<a href="http://www.phespirit.info/montypython/australian_table_wines.htm">This is a bottle with a message in, and the message is &#8216;beware&#8217;. This is not a wine for drinking, this is a wine for laying down and avoiding.</a>&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/06/nikon-wine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Upgrade Day at NikonWatch!</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/06/its-upgrade-day-at-nikonwatch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/06/its-upgrade-day-at-nikonwatch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 06:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Updated with minor edits]
Whee, we&#8217;re now again running the latest WordPress and they&#8217;ve actually made it relatively pain free to upgrade. If only they&#8217;d incorporate a visual-diff and merge process for your modifications to their PHP and CSS, it&#8217;d be even more pain-free.
But software is HARD and they do a great job!
If you notice any [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>[Updated with minor edits]</em><br />
Whee, we&#8217;re now again running the latest WordPress and they&#8217;ve actually made it relatively pain free to upgrade. If only they&#8217;d incorporate a visual-diff and merge process for your modifications to their PHP and CSS, it&#8217;d be even more pain-free.</p>
<p>But software is HARD and they do a great job!</p>
<p>If you notice any issues, please leave me a comment. I&#8217;m working on the RSS feeds as the last outstanding issue I&#8217;m aware of. Stand by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/06/its-upgrade-day-at-nikonwatch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon Historical Society (NHS)</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/02/nikon-historical-society-nhs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/02/nikon-historical-society-nhs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/02/nikon-historical-society-nhs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ I&#8217;ve had a link to the Nikon Historical Society in the blogroll for a while but I don&#8217;t think I ever really mentioned it and X sends me a link to a  list of their meetings and presentations like this one presented by a Ph.D. in friction and lubricants on the rangefinder cameras and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/nikonlogosmall.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="176" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="176" /> I&#8217;ve had a link to the <a href="http://www.nikonhs.org/">Nikon Historical Society </a>in the blogroll for a while but I don&#8217;t think I ever really mentioned it and <a href="http://akiroom.com/redbook-e/kenkyukai/">X sends me a link to a  list of their meetings</a> and presentations like <a href="http://akiroom.com/redbook-e/kenkyukai06b/kenkyukai200611.html">this one presented by a Ph.D. in friction and lubricants on the rangefinder cameras</a> and how they were specially lubricated for Arctic expeditions, etc.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re interested in the old cameras, which I think are utterly fascinating given that they were entirely mechanical and managed to do everything without any computer chips, you really ought to check out the <a href="http://www.nikonhs.org/">NHS</a> website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/09/02/nikon-historical-society-nhs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chase Jarvis (Pro) Got to Play with the D90 Ahead of Time</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/27/chase-jarvis-pro-got-to-play-with-the-d90-ahead-of-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/27/chase-jarvis-pro-got-to-play-with-the-d90-ahead-of-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/27/chase-jarvis-pro-got-to-play-with-the-d90-ahead-of-time/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Chase Jarvis (Pro) Got to play with the D90 ahead of time and tells us about it on video!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Chase Jarvis (Pro) <a href="http://blog.chasejarvis.com/blog/2008/08/chase-jarvis-raw-advance-testing-nikon.html">Got to play with the D90 ahead of time</a> and tells us about it on video!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/27/chase-jarvis-pro-got-to-play-with-the-d90-ahead-of-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ken on the Nikon D90&#8217;s Movie Mode</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/27/ken-on-the-nikon-d90s-movie-mode/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/27/ken-on-the-nikon-d90s-movie-mode/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/27/ken-on-the-nikon-d90s-movie-mode/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Update: Nikon D90 Movie-Mode examples can be found here thanks to Frigggo.]
Ken actually has some interesting things to say about the Nikon D90 movie mode:
&#8230;Nikon claims, probably correctly, that you&#8217;ll be getting much better results than an old-style camcorder because the sensor of the D90 is so much bigger&#8230;
&#8230;24 FPS means movies will look like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[<strong>Update</strong>: Nikon D90 Movie-Mode <a href="http://www.optyczne.pl/flash/d90.html">examples can be found here</a> thanks to Frigggo.]</p>
<p>Ken actually has <a href="http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d90.htm">some interesting things to say about the Nikon D90 movie mode</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/clacker.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="150" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="150" />&#8230;<font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">Nikon claims, probably correctly, that you&#8217;ll be getting much better results than an old-style camcorder because the sensor of the D90 is so much bigger&#8230;</font></p>
<p><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">&#8230;24 FPS means movies will look like movies, presuming you shoot at 1/50 shutter speed. In bright light, shorter exposures will make things look a bit jumpy, and movies at 24 PFS are never as smooth as real video, which is shot at 60 fields per second. The video of the D90 can look like movies, but will never have the smooth fluid motion of regular camcorders&#8230;</font></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/27/ken-on-the-nikon-d90s-movie-mode/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CaptureNX 2 &#8211; Totally Lacks Zazz</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/24/capturenx-2-totally-lacks-zazz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/24/capturenx-2-totally-lacks-zazz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 20:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/24/capturenx-2-totally-lacks-zazz/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[div#main{overflow:visible;}

I&#8217;ve been using Nikon&#8217;s CaptureNX 2 all day long and I&#8217;m frankly about as unimpressed as I was with version 1.x. I don&#8217;t know what they&#8217;re concentrating on but it&#8217;s definitely not workflow. 
I think they&#8217;re trying to turn it into a lamer version of Photoshop Elements, but it&#8217;s not even PaintShop Pro at this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style>div#main{overflow:visible;}</style>
<div style="background-color: #d53000; text-align:center;vertical-align: middle;width:425px;z-index:500;overflow:visible"><a href="http://www.adultswim.com/video/index.html" style="display:block;"><img src="http://www.adultswim.com/video/embeded_header.jpg" alt="" width="425" height="30" border="0"></a><object width="425" height="350" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://www.adultswim.com/video/vplayer/index.html"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="movie" value="http://www.adultswim.com/video/vplayer/index.html"/><param name="FlashVars" value="id=50999300502b19a8219dc0b512c630df" /><embed src="http://www.adultswim.com/video/vplayer/index.html" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" FlashVars="id=50999300502b19a8219dc0b512c630df" allowFullScreen="true" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></div>
<p>I&#8217;ve been using Nikon&#8217;s CaptureNX 2 all day long and I&#8217;m frankly about as unimpressed as I was with version 1.x. I don&#8217;t know what they&#8217;re concentrating on but it&#8217;s definitely not workflow. </p>
<p>I think they&#8217;re trying to turn it into a lamer version of Photoshop Elements, but it&#8217;s not even <a href="http://www.corel.com/servlet/Satellite/us/en/Product/1184951547051#tabview=tab0">PaintShop Pro</a> at this point.</p>
<p>* It still doesn&#8217;t use Windows metaphors (I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s mac-y on the Mac, but I doubt that too).</p>
<p>* Adjust your whitebalance- then change some other settings and your whitebalance is back where it was before?! STILL?! Why hasn&#8217;t this been fixed yet?</p>
<p>*Why am I sitting here waiting for an image to be sent to my printer? Why isn&#8217;t this threaded out?<br />
<img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/printinginprogress.jpg" alt="nikon capture nx 2" /><br />
Btw- to get pedantic, it&#8217;s should be &#8220;process&#8221;, not &#8220;progress&#8221;.</p>
<p>*Still can&#8217;t open more than 20 images. How about you let ME worry about how much my machine can handle?! I&#8217;m on a high-end machine!</p>
<p>*With a <strong>-30-</strong> in monitor (2560&#215;1600)- there&#8217;s finally enough realestate to do what I need to do.</p>
<p>* It might just be me- but the raw settings have been moved around and I&#8217;m finding it harder to find them than when I was new to V1.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time Nik and Nikon admit that this experiement is dead- customers hate paying for the ability to manipulate their RAW&#8217;s (thankfully, it was included with the D3, but that didn&#8217;t help me with my D2x), and it just needs to be a Photoshop plug-in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/24/capturenx-2-totally-lacks-zazz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D3x and D90- No &#8211; You Can&#8217;t Order Them Yet</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/14/d3x-and-d90-no-you-cant-order-them-yet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/14/d3x-and-d90-no-you-cant-order-them-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/14/d3x-and-d90-no-you-cant-order-them-yet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I want to remind everyone that cameras at REPUTABLE shops do not go on pre-sale before they&#8217;re announced by Nikon.I also want everyone to remember that yo mama wasn&#8217;t lying when she said that if it&#8217;s too good to be true, it probably is.
If the price is way lower than the reputable camera stores, I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/sucker.jpg" border="2" hspace="2" vspace="2" /></p>
<p>I want to remind everyone that cameras at REPUTABLE shops do not go on pre-sale before they&#8217;re announced by Nikon.I also want everyone to remember that yo mama wasn&#8217;t lying when she said that if it&#8217;s too good to be true, it probably is.</p>
<p>If the price is way lower than the reputable camera stores, I guarantee you&#8217;re going to be taken.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be a sucker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/14/d3x-and-d90-no-you-cant-order-them-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
