<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nikon Watch</title>
	<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com</link>
	<description>Helping you figure out WTF Nikon's doing... D3x? D900? D4? Rangefinder?</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 03:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Thom: August 27th, Nikon D90 and Nikkor 18-105mm Coming? No Nikon D3x?</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/20/thom-august-27th-nikon-d90-and-nikkor-18-105mm-coming-no-nikon-d3x/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/20/thom-august-27th-nikon-d90-and-nikkor-18-105mm-coming-no-nikon-d3x/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 03:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/20/thom-august-27th-nikon-d90-and-nikkor-18-105mm-coming-no-nikon-d3x/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My buddy PMG points me to the Photography Bay which reports that Thom writes:
August 18&#8211;Nikon&#8217;s next scheduled press conference is August 27th. I&#8217;ve already noted that the D90 and 18-105mm lens will be introduced shortly, so I think it likely that those two items are on the schedule for that meeting&#8230; 
&#8230;It now appears that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My buddy PMG points me to the <a href="http://www.photographybay.com/2008/08/19/nikon-d90-on-aug-27-mark-your-calendars/">Photography Bay which reports</a> that <a href="http://bythom.com/">Thom writes</a>:</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><em><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/amazing93.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="255" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="179" />August 18</em>&#8211;<span style="font-weight: bold">Nikon&#8217;s next scheduled press conference is August 27th</span>. I&#8217;ve already noted that the <span style="font-weight: bold">D90 and 18-105mm lens will be introduced shortly</span>, so I think it likely that those two items are on the schedule for that meeting&#8230; </font></p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px">&#8230;<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><span style="font-weight: bold">It now appears that my 2008 pro body predictions were backwards</span>. I predicted the D3x would appear and that the D700 would be pushed to a 2009 ship.<span style="font-weight: bold"> I&#8217;m now thinking that I must have misunderstood my original source</span> and got the products reversed. Even if a high resolution body is announced soon, I don&#8217;t see any of the indications I look for showing that it is ready to ship.</font></p>
<p>So a decent SLR body and an ok consumer-grade lens, nothing to get too excited about really. And he&#8217;s indicating that the predictions bandied about by many including the concept of 4 new bodies was just nuts, as I expected.</p>
<p>D3x next year- I&#8217;m betting. New lenses at Photokina- and I&#8217;m starting to doubt decent AF-S primes, but I&#8217;m still hoping I&#8217;m wrong- I&#8217;ve been hoping for their announcement for more than  a year now though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/20/thom-august-27th-nikon-d90-and-nikkor-18-105mm-coming-no-nikon-d3x/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D90 Video Mode</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/16/nikon-d90-video-mode/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/16/nikon-d90-video-mode/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/16/nikon-d90-video-mode/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nikon Rumors appears to have a shot of a Nikon D90&#8217;s LCD in video mode.
Also- PGM points out that Amazon and BHPhotoVideo are now buying google Adwords for D90.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/amazing92.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="256" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="186" />Nikon Rumors appears to have a shot of a <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/15/we-asked-for-it-and-we-got-it--nikon-d90-lcd-screen-in-video-mode.aspx">Nikon D90&#8217;s LCD in video mode</a>.</p>
<p>Also- PGM points out that Amazon and BHPhotoVideo are now buying google Adwords for D90.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/16/nikon-d90-video-mode/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D90 Early Pictures + Specs</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/14/nikon-d90-early-pictures-specs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/14/nikon-d90-early-pictures-specs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/14/nikon-d90-early-pictures-specs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Photography Bay has a shot of a posssible Nikon D90. It looks good to me, but I&#8217;ve been fooled before- there are some really good PP guys out there.
They&#8217;re also reporting the following specs:
* 14 bit A/D conversion (compared to 12 bit currently);
* live view;
* the EXPEED image processor;
* self-cleaning sensor;
* 3? LCD (up from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/amazing91.jpg" title="nikon d90 picture" alt="nikon d90 picture" align="left" border="2" height="256" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="178" />Photography Bay <a href="http://www.photographybay.com/2007/12/22/nikon-d90/">has a shot of a posssible Nikon D90</a>. It looks good to me, but I&#8217;ve been fooled before- there are some really good PP guys out there.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re also reporting the following specs:</p>
<blockquote><p>* 14 bit A/D conversion (compared to 12 bit currently);<br />
* live view;<br />
* the EXPEED image processor;<br />
* self-cleaning sensor;<br />
* 3? LCD (up from 2.5?) with higher resolution; and/or<br />
* 5 fps (up from 3);</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>The Following Are Guesses:</strong></p>
<p>Notice that it doesn&#8217;t mention movies- but looking at the picture,<strong> it&#8217;s got a microphone grill over the D90 logo</strong>. There&#8217;s no reason at all to put the mic grill in the front if it&#8217;s for recording memos with a shot like on the Dx series, <strong>so I&#8217;m guessing it&#8217;s to record sound with movies</strong> (duh).</p>
<p>We&#8217;re also seeing a <strong>Manual / AF switch on the body</strong>, why? Because <strong>it&#8217;ll be able to use the screw-drive lenses like the 50mm f/1.x and 85mm f/1.x</strong> and older lenses&#8211; you don&#8217;t need that switch on the AFS lenses!</p>
<p>Interestingly, this <strong>might </strong>also mean that <strong>we will NOT be seeing 50mm and 80mm AFS Nano primes</strong> - <em>but that&#8217;s a toss-up</em>.</p>
<p>There also appears to be a GPS plug-in port, rather than integrated, which continues to be baffling given that the P&amp;S cameras have GPS built-in now.</p>
<p>I continue to think it&#8217;s amusing that people are reporting that cameras have the eXpeed chipset in them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/14/nikon-d90-early-pictures-specs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D3x and D90- No - You Can&#8217;t Order Them Yet</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/14/d3x-and-d90-no-you-cant-order-them-yet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/14/d3x-and-d90-no-you-cant-order-them-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/14/d3x-and-d90-no-you-cant-order-them-yet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I want to remind everyone that cameras at REPUTABLE shops do not go on pre-sale before they&#8217;re announced by Nikon.I also want everyone to remember that yo mama wasn&#8217;t lying when she said that if it&#8217;s too good to be true, it probably is.
If the price is way lower than the reputable camera stores, I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/sucker.jpg" border="2" hspace="2" vspace="2" /></p>
<p>I want to remind everyone that cameras at REPUTABLE shops do not go on pre-sale before they&#8217;re announced by Nikon.I also want everyone to remember that yo mama wasn&#8217;t lying when she said that if it&#8217;s too good to be true, it probably is.</p>
<p>If the price is way lower than the reputable camera stores, I guarantee you&#8217;re going to be taken.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be a sucker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/14/d3x-and-d90-no-you-cant-order-them-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympics- Pros Really Like the Nikon D3!</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/14/olympics-pros-really-like-the-nikon-d3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/14/olympics-pros-really-like-the-nikon-d3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 17:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/14/olympics-pros-really-like-the-nikon-d3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Update: Sorry, they keep changing the links, so I can&#8217;t find the shots I&#8217;d linked to earlier. I&#8217;d still take a look though- there&#8217;re some nice pictures. Links fixed, it looks like they removed a few&#8230;]
I&#8217;ve seen a few shots like this one lately where there&#8217;re a wad of pro&#8217;s at the Olympics using the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[<strong>Update</strong>: Sorry, they keep changing the links, so I can&#8217;t find the shots I&#8217;d linked to earlier. I&#8217;d still take a look though- there&#8217;re some nice pictures. <strike>Links fixed, it looks like they removed a few&#8230;</strike>]<br />
I&#8217;ve seen <a href="http://www.stern.de/olympia2008/fotostrecken/:Fotostrecke-Die-Bilder-Spiele/634192.html?cp=42">a few shots like this one lately where there&#8217;re a wad of pro&#8217;s at the Olympics</a> using the Nikon equipment. We didn&#8217;t see shots like this, even last year!</p>
<p>What&#8217;s really interesting to me too is that they&#8217;re still using those awful photographer&#8217;s vests despite the fact that you &#8216;re not carrying 10 rolls of film and sets of batteries, etc, on you.</p>
<p>I normally to get away with 2 16gb cards and a polarizer- all easily fitting into 2 pockets, but I&#8217;m no pro.</p>
<p>Oh- and just to remind you that being in the right time and the right place is important, <a href="http://www.stern.de/olympia2008/fotostrecken/:Fotostrecke-Die-Bilder-Spiele/634192.html?cp=43">I give you this gratuitous shot</a>.</p>
<p>I also remind you that &#8230; aw never mind, here&#8217;s another really gratutious shot that you will not see published (nsfw- includes a boob).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.stern.de/olympia2008/fotostrecken/:Fotostrecke-Die-Bilder-Spiele/634192.html?cp=50"><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/waterpoloboob.jpg" align="middle" border="2" hspace="2" vspace="2" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.stern.de/olympia2008/fotostrecken/:Fotostrecke-Die-Bilder-Spiele/634192.html?cp=58">Cheerleaders</a> (sfw)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.stern.de/olympia2008/fotostrecken/:Fotostrecke-Die-Bilder-Spiele/634192.html?cp=81">More cheerleaders</a>  (sfw)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.stern.de/olympia2008/fotostrecken/:Fotostrecke-Die-Bilder-Spiele/634192.html?cp=62">Brazil  (sfw)<br />
</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.stern.de/olympia2008/fotostrecken/:Fotostrecke-Die-Bilder-Spiele/634192.html?cp=75">Female power lifter</a> (didn&#8217;t know they had them)  (sfw)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.joeydevilla.com/2008/08/11/marilou-dozois-prevost-lookin-and-liftin-good/">Another she&#8217;s hot</a>- Marilou Dozois-Prevost of Canada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/14/olympics-pros-really-like-the-nikon-d3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D700 HDMI Doesn&#8217;t Use the Regular Connector?</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/14/d700-hdmi-doesnt-use-the-regular-connector/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/14/d700-hdmi-doesnt-use-the-regular-connector/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/14/d700-hdmi-doesnt-use-the-regular-connector/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arg- apparently, the D700 doesn&#8217;t use the regular HDMI (Type-A) connector, it uses a HDMI-Mini (Type-C) connector.
Wow, I didn&#8217;t even know there were different types of connectors. Thankfully, the D3 use the more normal Type-A.
If you&#8217;d like to get a cable, here&#8217;s where I bought mine for &#60;$10 and they worked quite well. You do [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arg- apparently, the D700 doesn&#8217;t use the regular HDMI (Type-A) connector, it uses a HDMI-Mini (Type-C) connector.</p>
<p>Wow, I didn&#8217;t even know there were different types of connectors. Thankfully, the D3 use the more normal Type-A.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;d like to get a cable, <a href="http://www.mycablemart.com/store/cart.php?m=product_list&amp;c=82">here&#8217;s where I bought mine</a> for &lt;$10 and they worked quite well. You do not need to spend a lot of money on an HDMI cable- it&#8217;s digital so it (more or less) either gets there or it doesn&#8217;t- it&#8217;s not like analog audiophile equipment.</p>
<p>And if you haven&#8217;t tried the HDMI out of your camera, let me tell you that it&#8217;s fantastic and wonderful to be able to put up your family snapshots on a huge HD tv instead of emailing them around a week later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/14/d700-hdmi-doesnt-use-the-regular-connector/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D90 in Best Buy&#8217;s Inventory System</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/13/d90-in-best-buys-inventory-system/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/13/d90-in-best-buys-inventory-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/13/d90-in-best-buys-inventory-system/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Engadget reports that the Nikon D90 is now in their stock system too- at $1299.99. So apparently, the sellers know what&#8217;s happening but, as usual, Nikon won&#8217;t bother telling anyone for a while.
That price, btw, is WITH the kit 18-105mm lens, same as with Circuit City as reported yesterday.
But- the last time I went to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/amazing88.jpg" title="nikon d90 dslr" alt="nikon d90 dslr" align="left" border="2" height="256" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="187" /><a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-admin/post-new.php">Engadget reports that the Nikon D90</a> is now in their stock system too- at $1299.99. So apparently, the sellers know what&#8217;s happening but, as usual, Nikon won&#8217;t bother telling anyone for a while.</p>
<p>That price, btw, is WITH the kit 18-105mm lens, same as with <a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/11/nikon-d90-18-105mm-vr-kit-lens-circuit-city-129999/">Circuit City as reported yesterday</a>.</p>
<p>But- the last time I went to Best Buy and asked them to pull up something on their inventory system, I was told, &#8220;We <strong>might</strong> have that&#8230;&#8221; then after determining that they didn&#8217;t, and they didn&#8217;t know when they would have it, I was told that I could order it- which is pretty crappy. So I don&#8217;t trust their inventory system, but this at least appears to confirm the Circuit City system.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.upcdatabase.com/item/018208254484">UPC Database also seems to confirm the UPC</a> that&#8217;s shown in the picture.</p>
<p>Wake me when the D3x or something like a digital rangefinder finally shows up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/13/d90-in-best-buys-inventory-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Nikon D90 Info - Kinda&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/12/more-nikon-d90-info-kinda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/12/more-nikon-d90-info-kinda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 02:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/12/more-nikon-d90-info-kinda/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Busch of Nikon Digital Field Guide fame (? I&#8217;ve never heard of him- I use the Magic Lantern series when necessary) has some commentary and conjecture on the upcoming (? Nothing but rumors so far) D90:
 12 megapixel resolution.  To be honest, the D80 had great image quality with its 10 MP sensor, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Busch of Nikon Digital Field Guide fame (? I&#8217;ve never heard of him- I use the <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?ci=0&amp;shs=magic+lantern&amp;sb=ps&amp;pn=1&amp;sq=desc&amp;InitialSearch=yes&amp;O=jsp%2FRootPage.jsp&amp;A=search&amp;Q=*&amp;bhs=t&amp;Go.x=0&amp;Go.y=0&amp;Go=submit">Magic Lantern series</a> when necessary) has some commentary and conjecture on the upcoming (? Nothing but rumors so far) D90:</p>
<blockquote><p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/amazing89.jpg" title="Nikon D90" alt="Nikon D90" align="left" border="2" height="256" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="178" /> <strong>12 megapixel resolution. </strong> To be honest, the D80 had great image quality with its 10 MP sensor, and you probably shouldn&#8217;t expect a huge difference with the 12 MP Nikon D90. &#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Video recording.</strong>  I&#8217;ll be interested in evaluating the video clips produced by this camera.  &#8230;</p>
<p><strong>PS compatibility.</strong>  With GPS features built into point-and-shoot cameras and cell phones, many dSLR owners will come to expect at least the ability to <em>connect</em> a GPS location tagger to their cameras.  If you go this route, you&#8217;ll never wonder where you shot your vacation pictures again&#8230;.</p></blockquote>
<p>He also has some conjecture on the Nikon D3x, but honestly, if you read this site, there&#8217;s probably nothing public that you don&#8217;t already know about all of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/12/more-nikon-d90-info-kinda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D90 +  18-105mm VR Kit Lens - Circuit City - $1299.99?</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/11/nikon-d90-18-105mm-vr-kit-lens-circuit-city-129999/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/11/nikon-d90-18-105mm-vr-kit-lens-circuit-city-129999/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/11/nikon-d90-18-105mm-vr-kit-lens-circuit-city-129999/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems to be way more solid than it had been, so I&#8217;m guessing we&#8217;ll hear an announcement soon enough.
In any case, that Nikon site that reports any rumor it can find appears to have a scoop submitted by a guy who works at Circuit City.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/amazing88.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="256" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="181" />Seems to be way more solid than it had been, so I&#8217;m guessing we&#8217;ll hear an announcement soon enough.</p>
<p>In any case, that Nikon site that reports any rumor it can find <a href="http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/11/nikon-d90-kit-price-129999-you-can-almost-order-it.aspx">appears to have a scoop</a> submitted by a guy who works at Circuit City.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/11/nikon-d90-18-105mm-vr-kit-lens-circuit-city-129999/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D90- Surfacing?</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/11/nikon-d90-surfacing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/11/nikon-d90-surfacing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/11/nikon-d90-surfacing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m starting to see more and more reports of the Nikon D90 and thanks to everyone to pointed this one out (Can anyone translate it?):

Nikola writes:
 See the link below (this is official Slovenian Sigma dealer and also DSLRs dealer) and you can find a D90 marked as NEW, listed in the price list.
There is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/amazing87.jpg" title="nikon d90 surfacing" alt="nikon d90 surfacing" align="left" border="2" height="256" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="178" />I&#8217;m starting to see more and more reports of the Nikon D90 and thanks to everyone to<a href="http://www.slr.si/"> pointed this one out</a> (Can anyone translate it?):</p>
<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/d90price.jpg" title="nikon d90 surfacing- no price, fall announcement?" alt="nikon d90 surfacing- no price, fall announcement?" align="middle" border="2" hspace="2" vspace="2" /></p>
<p>Nikola writes:</p>
<blockquote><p> See the link below (this is <strong>official Slovenian Sigma dealer and also DSLRs dealer</strong>) and you can find a D90 marked as NEW, listed in the price list.</p>
<p>There is <strong>no price yet</strong>, but it is written that <strong>we can expect it this fall</strong>.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/11/nikon-d90-surfacing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get 8 FPS Frames per Second on Your D700 Without the Battery Grip</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/08/get-8-fps-frames-per-second-on-your-d700-without-the-battery-grip/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/08/get-8-fps-frames-per-second-on-your-d700-without-the-battery-grip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/08/get-8-fps-frames-per-second-on-your-d700-without-the-battery-grip/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[easyRobin says that you can get 8fps on your D700 if you don&#8217;t use the battery grip with a simple, easy procedure:

If you want the higher than standard FPS without the vertical grip, do the following:
First, make the following custom setting adjustments:
e5: Flash only
e6: Flash only
f4: Button press - Bracketing burst
f4: Button + dials - [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>easyRobin says that you can get 8fps on your D700 if you don&#8217;t use the battery grip with a simple, easy procedure:</p>
<blockquote>
<p class="justify"><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/amazing86.jpg" title="more fps on your nikon d700" alt="more fps on your nikon d700" align="left" border="2" height="256" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="186" />If you want the higher than standard FPS without the vertical grip, do the following:</p>
<p>First, make the following custom setting adjustments:</p>
<p>e5: Flash only<br />
e6: Flash only<br />
f4: Button press - Bracketing burst<br />
f4: Button + dials - Bracketing mode</p>
<p class="justify">Set exposure manually. Activate bracketing with the Fn + Command dial and set 9F (9 frames). Set your shooting mode to single-shot (S). Do not use flash. Then hold the Fn button and when you are ready to shoot, press the shutter release and continue holding the Fn button. The camera will fire up to 9 frames at 8 fps.</p>
<p class="justify">To continue shooting after 9 frames, you will need to let up on the shutter release and depress it again. If you fire fewer than 9 shots, you will only be able to shoot the remaining exposures in your 9-frame burst if you continue shooting again, without letting up on the shutter release again.</p>
<p class="justify">Since you have set auto bracketing to apply only to flash, your non-flash bracketing burst is fired at your manually set exposure — it is not bracketed.</p>
<p>Have fun, it really works!</p></blockquote>
<p>Can anyone confirm this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/08/get-8-fps-frames-per-second-on-your-d700-without-the-battery-grip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Break Your SB-800- Make it Able to Swivel 315&#8242;!</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/07/break-your-sb-800-make-it-able-to-swivel-315/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/07/break-your-sb-800-make-it-able-to-swivel-315/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/07/break-your-sb-800-make-it-able-to-swivel-315/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Want to break your SB-800 a little internally so that it&#8217;ll swivel 180 to one side like normal, then ~135&#8242; to the other side instead of  stopping at 90&#8242;? I kind of do, but would prefer to try it on a dead flash  instead of an expensive live one.
Pete didn&#8217;t seem too concerned [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want to break your SB-800 a little internally so that it&#8217;ll swivel 180 to one side like normal, then ~135&#8242; to the other side instead of  stopping at 90&#8242;? I kind of do, but would prefer to try it on a dead flash  instead of an expensive live one.</p>
<p>Pete didn&#8217;t seem too <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMhm-aKACnc">concerned though</a>. (If you&#8217;re using IE, you may or may not see an embedded youtube video. If not, please use the link):<br />
<object width="425" height="349">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZMhm-aKACnc&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0xe1600f&#038;color2=0xfebd01&#038;border=1"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZMhm-aKACnc&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0xe1600f&#038;color2=0xfebd01&#038;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="400" height="324"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/07/break-your-sb-800-make-it-able-to-swivel-315/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon Profit Declines 23% on Lower Camera Prices</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/07/nikon-profit-declines-23-on-lower-camera-prices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/07/nikon-profit-declines-23-on-lower-camera-prices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[OFFICIAL F'ING NEWS!!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/07/nikon-profit-declines-23-on-lower-camera-prices/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
[Note: zoetmb  rightly points out in  the comments that these are overall Nikon Corp numbers, not specifically related to camera revenue. I hope to get the chance to review the entire filing over the next few days to attempt to glean some more information from our hermit company.]
Nikon Corp&#8217;s 1st quarter results are in and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/nikonlogosmall.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="176" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="176" /><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=apKquTVe5vA8"></a></p>
<p>[<strong>Note: </strong><cite>zoetmb</cite>  rightly points out in  the comments that these are overall Nikon Corp numbers, not specifically related to camera revenue. I hope to get the chance to review the entire filing over the next few days to attempt to glean some more information from our hermit company.]</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=apKquTVe5vA8">Nikon Corp&#8217;s 1st quarter results are i</a><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=apKquTVe5vA8">n</a> and no one&#8217;s going to get a bonus.</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=4902%3AJP" onmouseover="return escape( popwQuoteShort( this, '4902:JP' ))">Net income</a> dropped to 18 billion yen ($166 million) in the three months ended June 30, from 23.4 billion yen a year earlier, Tokyo-based Nikon said in a statement today. Sales climbed 6.4 percent to 237.9 billion yen. &#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=7731%3AJP" onmouseover="return escape( popwQuoteShort( this, '7731:JP' ))">Operating profit,</a> or sales minus the cost of goods sold and administrative expenses, declined 21 percent to 28.7 billion yen.</p>
<p>The yen appreciated 17 percent against the dollar in the year ended June 30, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.</p></blockquote>
<p>They&#8217;re projecting that sales will go up a bit, but overall profits will go down. Maybe if they put out 10 more Coolpix&#8217;s&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/07/nikon-profit-declines-23-on-lower-camera-prices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D3 Buffer Upgrade- How to Tell</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/07/nikon-d3-buffer-upgrade-how-to-tell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/07/nikon-d3-buffer-upgrade-how-to-tell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/07/nikon-d3-buffer-upgrade-how-to-tell/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harrison, on a Nikon list, writes that he had the buffer upgrade done a week ago and there&#8217;s a change to the menu to tell you if it was upgraded:
 Subject: Re: D3 back from Buffer Upgrade
From: Harrison Diamond
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 11:18:40 -0400
One more thing&#8230; on the firmware screen there is now a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/d3realsmall.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="122" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="128" />Harrison, on a Nikon list, writes that he had the buffer upgrade done a week ago and there&#8217;s a change to the menu to tell you if it was upgraded:</p>
<blockquote><p> Subject: Re: D3 back from Buffer Upgrade<br />
From: Harrison Diamond<br />
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 11:18:40 -0400</p>
<p>One more thing&#8230; on <strong>the firmware screen there is now a graphic in the</strong><br />
<strong> upper right corner showing two memory chips  and a &#8220;2X&#8221; to indicate</strong><br />
<strong> the buffer upgrade.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>This is important because when you buy a used D3 or sell yours, you&#8217;ll want to know or be able to show that it was upgraded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/07/nikon-d3-buffer-upgrade-how-to-tell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon Announces P6000 P&#038;S! 13.5mp with NEW RAW FORMAT</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/07/nikon-announces-p6000-ps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/07/nikon-announces-p6000-ps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[OFFICIAL F'ING NEWS!!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/07/nikon-announces-p6000-ps/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
[Update: I CANNOT find a picture of the ethernet port- has anyone seen one?]
Whee! New point and shoots and Coolpix&#8217;s- we apparently didn&#8217;t have enough.
But I&#8217;m actually happy to know the P6000 is real- on occasion, I have a pang of guilt when using a Canon- but you can&#8217;t argue with results and I love [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/nikonlogosmall.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="176" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="176" /></p>
<p>[<strong>Update</strong>: I CANNOT <a href="http://press.nikonusa.com/gallery/product.php?c=nikon/COOLPIX/P6000/">find a picture</a> of the ethernet port- has anyone seen one?]</p>
<p>Whee! New point and shoots and Coolpix&#8217;s- we apparently didn&#8217;t have enough.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m actually happy to know the <a href="http://press.nikonusa.com/2008/08/new_coolpix_p6000_offers_digit.php">P6000 is real</a>- on occasion, I have a pang of guilt when using a Canon- but you can&#8217;t argue with results and I love my G3 and would be happy to get a G9.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the rundown in order of the press-release, meaning that this is the order of items that the Marketing-droids think will most make you want to buy it:</p>
<p><center><a href="http://press.nikonusa.com/gallery/product.php?c=nikon/COOLPIX/P6000/" title="nikon p6000"><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/p6000real.jpg" align="middle" border="2" height="300" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="400" /></a></center></p>
<ul>
<li>13.5 mp</li>
<li>Built-in GPS for geo-tagging</li>
<li>added wired LAN support via a <strong>dedicated Ethernet</strong> port built into the camera. Users <strong>can upload their images and data directly from the P6000 with an Ethernet cable to the secure Picture Bank service</strong> on <a href="http://mypicturetown.com/">my Picturetown</a></li>
<li>MyPictureTown easy uploading</li>
<li>PSAM shooting modes for creative control</li>
<li>Raw mode via &#8220;all-new&#8221; NRW format (wtf?), ViewNX updates due in October to handle it</li>
<li>Some custom button functionality</li>
<li>Adding <strong>even more <em>synergy</em></strong><em> </em>between D-SLR cameras and compact COOLPIX cameras, the P6000 incorporates a pop-up flash, optical viewfinder for easy composition and the added bonus of system expansion with an optional convertor&#8230;</li>
<li>Plays nice with iTTL and the CLS</li>
<li>features a quality finish and a front panel constructed of solid Magnesium alloy</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>P6000 will be available nationwide beginning September 2008 at a MSRP of $499.95.</strong></p>
<p><strong>So what&#8217;s notable: </strong>GPS included, new NRW raw format, contains the most synergy of any Coolpix.</p>
<p>First: <strong>SYNGERY?!</strong> Did Nikon invent a time machine capable of taking us back to 1993 to mine corporate-speak?</p>
<p>But even more- <strong>OM.F.G- another <em>proprietary </em>raw format</strong>. Maybe we&#8217;ll be lucky this time- the whole damned file will be <a href="http://www.pdnonline.com/pdn/prodtech/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000886076">encrypted instead of just the white balance</a>.</p>
<p><strong>An ethernet port!</strong> My heart flutters- can anyone tell me if I can ONLY upload to MyPictureTown (does anyone use that?) via Nikon software are does the camera show up as an FTP/HTTP server or something? Any clue which speed? (PLEASE 100mb&#8230;) 100mb would be on par with fast USB, 10mb would not be a good replacement for a USB card reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/07/nikon-announces-p6000-ps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon Coolpix S710 - 14.5mp, High ISO. Plus Another Coolpix&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/07/nikon-coolpix-s710-145mp-high-iso-plus-another-coolpix/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/07/nikon-coolpix-s710-145mp-high-iso-plus-another-coolpix/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[OFFICIAL F'ING NEWS!!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/07/nikon-coolpix-s710-145mp-high-iso-plus-another-coolpix/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Nikon&#8217;s announced the new Coolpix S710- a 14.5 megapixel noise machine targeted at people who have $350 to buy a camera with.
The only standout feature is the incredibly high ISO settings for a point and shoot which uses pixel-binning to get to 6400-12800 iso&#8217;s.
I&#8217;d really love to see some low-light images with this thing, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/nikonlogosmall.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="176" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="176" /><br />
Nikon&#8217;s <a href="http://press.nikonusa.com/2008/08/nikon_blends_sleek_styling_and.php">announced the new Coolpix S710</a>- a 14.5 megapixel noise machine targeted at people who have $350 to buy a camera with.</p>
<p>The only standout feature is the incredibly high ISO settings for a point and shoot which uses pixel-binning to get to 6400-12800 iso&#8217;s.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d really love to see some low-light images with this thing, but can&#8217;t seem to find any and I really don&#8217;t expect to be wowed when I put its output next to my D3&#8230; or D2x&#8230; or, say, my Holga with 400iso Tri-x.<br />
<center><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/s710real.jpg" align="middle" border="2" height="300" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="400" /></center>&#8211;</p>
<p>Nikon has also <a href="http://press.nikonusa.com/2008/08/nikons_new_coolpix_s560_offers.php">announced the Coolpix S560</a>, for people who have $250usd and need an adequate but largely undistinguished point and soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/07/nikon-coolpix-s710-145mp-high-iso-plus-another-coolpix/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adorama Predicts Nikon Digital Rangefinder for Photokina 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/06/adorama-predicts-nikon-digital-rangefinder-for-photokina-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/06/adorama-predicts-nikon-digital-rangefinder-for-photokina-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 02:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/06/adorama-predicts-nikon-digital-rangefinder-for-photokina-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mason at Adorama is making some predictions for Photokina 2008. None of them are interesting except:
8. At least two digital rangefinders will be introduced. I&#8217;m putting my money on Nikon and Olympus to unveil interchangeable-lens rangefinder cameras based around DSLR sensors. Olympus has already laid the technical groundwork with its announcement of the Micro Four [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/amazing85.jpg" align="left" border="2" hspace="2" vspace="2" />Mason at Adorama is making some predictions for Photokina 2008. None of them are interesting except:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>8. At least two digital rangefinders will be introduced.</strong> <strong>I&#8217;m putting my money on Nikon</strong> and Olympus <strong>to unveil interchangeable-lens rangefinder cameras based around DSLR sensors</strong>. Olympus has already laid the technical groundwork with its announcement of the Micro Four Thirds system, which allows for smaller camera bodies and no room for optical mirror prisms. While the obvious direction is EVFs (see item #3, above), they could drop a bombshell and create a digital rangefinder and a few fixed-focal-length, manual-focus lenses for a lot less than the $5K Leica M8. <strong>What do I base my Nikon prediction on? <em>Nothing</em>&#8230;I just like to dream. </strong></p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;<em>Nothing</em>&#8220;?! Why must he play with our heart like this? I&#8217;m guessing we either won&#8217;t see a rangefinder or similar camera or we won&#8217;t see it for a long time. I see more P&amp;S cameras like the rumored P6000 to take on the Canon Gx series (like the G9)- My G3 is a gem of a P&amp;S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/06/adorama-predicts-nikon-digital-rangefinder-for-photokina-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D3 - Upgraded Shutter Assembly?</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/06/nikon-d3-upgraded-shutter-assembly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/06/nikon-d3-upgraded-shutter-assembly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/06/nikon-d3-upgraded-shutter-assembly/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A poster on dpReview says:
&#8230;[sensor got dirty and] I had Nikon Service in Missassauga Canada clean it and the fee was substantial!
When I picked the body up from service, I was told that a more robust shutter is available and that while I&#8217;m still under warranty I should have the work completed. I was told [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/amazing84.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="255" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="173" />A <a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&amp;message=28872337">poster on dpReview says</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;[sensor got dirty and] I had <strong>Nikon Service in Missassauga Canada</strong> clean it and the fee was substantial!</p>
<p class="justify"><strong>Wh</strong><strong>en I picked the body up from service, I was told that a more robust shutter is available and that while I&#8217;m still under warranty I should have the work completed.</strong> I was told that <strong>there isn&#8217;t anything wrong with my shutter, but that a &#8220;stronger spring assembly is available&#8221;</strong> which was not installed on my D3 because it is probably an earlier unit.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m really hoping that this is spurious. I won&#8217;t hit a high number of shots any time soon (too much work, I&#8217;m afraid), and don&#8217;t care to pay for a new shutter in a few years that could have been replaced now.</p>
<p>Since Nikon is always unnecessarily tight-lipped, we&#8217;ll never know which range of serial numbers could be affected- <strong>IF</strong> this is true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/06/nikon-d3-upgraded-shutter-assembly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D90 at Photokina? Video Mode? + 18-105mm Varible Ap Lens</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/06/nikon-d90-at-photokina-video-mode-18-105mm-varible-ap-lens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/06/nikon-d90-at-photokina-video-mode-18-105mm-varible-ap-lens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/06/nikon-d90-at-photokina-video-mode-18-105mm-varible-ap-lens/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thom writes, Engadget et al report:
&#8230;Curiously, at a casual glance the only thing that most people will notice different from a D80 is the presence of a much bigger color LCD on the back&#8230;
So what is a D90? Well, a 12mp, ~4.5 fps DSLR, basically. On paper those seem like modest boosts from the D80. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/amazing82.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="256" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="175" /><a href="http://bythom.com/">Thom writes</a>, Engadget et al report:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Curiously, at a casual glance the only thing that most people will notice different from a D80 is the presence of a much bigger color LCD on the back&#8230;</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">So what is a D90? Well, <strong>a 12mp, ~4.5 fps DSLR, basically</strong>. On paper those seem like modest boosts from the D80. In practice, they are a distinct notch forward in performance. The big news, however, is that<strong> Live View now has a twist that other DSLRs can&#8217;t currently claim: it can record video</strong> (thus the microphone grill).</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">We also get a new lens for kitting with the D90:<strong> the 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G DX VR</strong>. Modest in size (67mm filter size), &#8230; Essentially, this is a 28-150mm equivalent. Not truly superzoom, but a good compromise between size and reach. This new lens also plugs the VR hole Nikon had in the DX lens lineup (essentially no VR in the kit lenses if you wanted more than 55 but less than 200 at the long end).</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">To my knowledge, Nikon hasn&#8217;t scheduled a press conference for product introduction yet&#8230;</font></p></blockquote>
<p>Movie mode! So- I suppose they&#8217;re dispensing with the physical shutter when used in that mode. I wonder how good the image quality of the video will be- if it was good (I doubt it, but maybe), then <strong>maybe there will also be a single-shot totally silent mode</strong>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/06/nikon-d90-at-photokina-video-mode-18-105mm-varible-ap-lens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon Meeting on Wednesday the 6th?</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/04/nikon-meeting-on-wednesday-the-6th/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/04/nikon-meeting-on-wednesday-the-6th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/04/nikon-meeting-on-wednesday-the-6th/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
[Update: No clue when, no clue where, no clue what.]
Oh who knows? We get so many reports of this kind&#8230; Maybe a D3x will be announced, maybe some more bland, pointless Coolpix&#8217;s will be announced (&#8221;This one&#8217;s in blue! These go to 11!&#8220;), maybe there&#8217;ll be something that knocks our socks off- trying to predict [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/amazing83.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="256" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="179" /><a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1021&amp;thread=28830252&amp;page=1"></a></p>
<p>[Update: No clue when, no clue where, no clue what.]</p>
<p><a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1021&amp;thread=28830252&amp;page=1">Oh who knows?</a> We get so many reports of this kind&#8230; Maybe a D3x will be announced, maybe some more bland, pointless Coolpix&#8217;s will be announced (&#8221;This one&#8217;s in blue! <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d54UU-fPIsY">These go to 11!</a>&#8220;), maybe there&#8217;ll be something that knocks our socks off- trying to predict it is pointless.</p>
<blockquote><p>I <strong>don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s true</strong> but here it is anyway: <strong>Nikon will have a new annoucement this coming Wednesday, August 6, 2008</strong>.<strong> I have no idea what they will annouce</strong>. Might be a new D3X or maybe a new D90 or some other camera or lenses. Let&#8217;s hope it&#8217;s true and some new equipment is coming.</p></blockquote>
<p>[Edited for poor proof-reading.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/08/04/nikon-meeting-on-wednesday-the-6th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D90 Rumors</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/31/nikon-d90-rumors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/31/nikon-d90-rumors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 01:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/31/nikon-d90-rumors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m starting to see D90 rumors flying (thanks to everyone who sent them in). Don&#8217;t know if they&#8217;re really D900 rumors or if there&#8217;ll be a D90 and a D900- but I&#8217;m thinking that would just confuse things for now.
In any case, from Thom (if you believe it):
Technically, Nikon has been a bit behind on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/amazing81.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="256" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="175" />I&#8217;m starting to see D90 rumors flying (thanks to everyone who sent them in). Don&#8217;t know if they&#8217;re really D900 rumors or if there&#8217;ll be a D90 and a D900- but I&#8217;m thinking that would just confuse things for now.</p>
<p>In any case, <a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&amp;message=28802888">from Thom (if you believe it)</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Technically, Nikon has been a bit behind on that.<em> In the consumer market, <strong>sensor cleaning</strong> and ubiquitous <strong>VR (via the sensor)</strong> and live view all got established by competitors well before Nikon did it. <strong>That&#8217;s going to shift a bit with the D9</strong>0</em>, I think, but the D60 is an example of Nikon NOT doing the above. And in the higher lineup, of course Canon beat Nikon to the punch with FX, affordable FX, pixel counts, and high ISO capabilities. It&#8217;s only in this current design cycle that we see Nikon now trying to do what you suggest.</p></blockquote>
<p>In-body VR would be great&#8211; if it worked well. I remember way old Sony digicams that would do VR by cropping your sensor and then as you moved the camera, they&#8217;d just use a part of the chip that had been cropped until you had moved it-so basically selectively using part of the chip.</p>
<p>Also- <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5026387/nikon-d90-coming-in-early-september-or-is-it-the-d3x-or-both">Gizmodo </a>and other sites are reporting a possible Sept 3rd Nikon conference, to maybe announce something new like the D90 or maybe D3x&#8230; who knows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/31/nikon-d90-rumors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon + FujiFilm 4ever?</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/31/nikon-fujifilm-4ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/31/nikon-fujifilm-4ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 01:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/31/nikon-fujifilm-4ever/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got a report that Nikon may be BUYING FujiFilm. No I can&#8217;t substantiate it, no I can&#8217;t find anything but periodic reports of this going back for years. I&#8217;m not actually sure what Nikon would get out of it- possibly some sensor patents from Fuji like the one for using different sized pixels in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/amazing80.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="256" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="179" />I got a report that Nikon may be BUYING FujiFilm. No I can&#8217;t substantiate it, no I can&#8217;t find anything but periodic reports of this going back for years. I&#8217;m not actually sure what Nikon would get out of it- possibly some sensor patents from Fuji like the one for using different sized pixels in their sensor to get better dynamic range.</p>
<p>Though I think it&#8217;d be smarter to simply license any patents Nikon would like, rather than buy Fuji wholesale. Also, Nikon seems to be doing fine in the sensor-design category itself&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/31/nikon-fujifilm-4ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D3 - Buffer Upgrade - $500 for 2x the Shots</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/31/nikon-d3-buffer-upgrade-500-for-2x-the-shots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/31/nikon-d3-buffer-upgrade-500-for-2x-the-shots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[OFFICIAL F'ING NEWS!!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/31/nikon-d3-buffer-upgrade-500-for-2x-the-shots/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the beginning with the D3, we&#8217;ve noticed that 9fps quickly bogged down depending on which settings you had.
Nikon&#8217;s noticed and now they&#8217;re providing a buffer upgrade service for $500 starting yesterday.
Highlights:
Fee and Return
The cost is $500.00 plus your state tax. Customer is responsible for all shipping costs. Please allow up to two weeks time [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/nikonlogosmall.jpg" title="nikon logo" alt="nikon logo" align="left" border="2" hspace="2" vspace="2" />From the beginning with the D3, we&#8217;ve noticed that 9fps quickly bogged down depending on which settings you had.</p>
<p>Nikon&#8217;s noticed and <a href="http://support.nikontech.com/cgi-bin/nikonusa.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=15997&amp;p_created=1217432222&amp;p_sid=IWTIp5aj&amp;p_accessibility=0&amp;p_redirect=&amp;p_lva=13783&amp;p_sp=cF9zcmNoPTEmcF9zb3J0X2J5PSZwX2dyaWRzb3J0PSZwX3Jvd19jbnQ9OCw4JnBfcHJvZHM9MTksNDUyJnBfY2F0cz0wJnBfcHY9Mi40NTImcF9jdj0mcF9zZWFyY2hfdHlwZT1hbnN3ZXJzLnNlYXJjaF9ubCZwX3BhZ2U9MSZwX3NlYXJjaF90ZXh0PWJ1ZmZlciB1cGdyYWRl&amp;p_li=&amp;p_topview=1">now they&#8217;re providing a buffer upgrade service for $500</a> starting yesterday.</p>
<p>Highlights:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Fee and Return</strong><br />
The cost is $500.00 plus your state tax. Customer is responsible for all shipping costs. Please allow up to two weeks time for the <strong style="color: #0000cc; background-color: #dbddba">Buffer</strong> Memory Expansion service; should more time be required, the user will be informed.</p></blockquote>
<p>Fill out this <a href="http://form.nikonimagesvcapprove.com/">form before sending</a>.</p>
<p>Performance: FX raw 14bit standard is 16 shots, upgraded to 36.</p>
<p>$500 is kind of pricey though- thankfully I don&#8217;t need high FPS that much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/31/nikon-d3-buffer-upgrade-500-for-2x-the-shots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yup- D700 Ships With LCD Protector</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/28/yup-d700-ships-with-lcd-protector/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/28/yup-d700-ships-with-lcd-protector/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/28/yup-d700-ships-with-lcd-protector/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to everyone for writing into tell me that it comes with the LCD protector- it appears that the D700&#8217;s LCD is based on (or is&#8230;) the D300&#8217;s LCD.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to everyone for writing into tell me that it comes with the LCD protector- it <em>appears </em>that the D700&#8217;s LCD is based on (or is&#8230;) the D300&#8217;s LCD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/28/yup-d700-ships-with-lcd-protector/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Non-Bayer, Dichroic Sensor in the Works- Again?</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/28/non-bayer-dichroic-sensor-in-the-works-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/28/non-bayer-dichroic-sensor-in-the-works-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/28/non-bayer-dichroic-sensor-in-the-works-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember this story from a while back where Nikon got a patent on a non-Bayer sensor?
Well, a birdie sends a pretty picture of its layout and writes:
  - A new type of pixel/micro-lens arrangement allows hexagonal elements (pixels) and a cartesian (x-y) read out.
  -Maximizing efficiency (capture area) of every ray of light [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember this story from a while back where <a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/2007/08/10/new-patent-for-sensor-old-news/">Nikon got a patent on a non-Bayer sensor</a>?</p>
<p>Well, a birdie sends a pretty picture of its layout and writes:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/amazing79.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="256" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="180" />  - A <strong>new type of pixel/micro-lens arrangement allows hexagonal elements</strong> (pixels) and a cartesian (x-y) read out.</p>
<blockquote><p>  -Maximizing efficiency (capture area) of every ray of light goes though the micro-lenses.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p> -There is limit on the smallest size of each micro-lens (due to the mirrors), hence resolution of this type of sensor may limit to the pixel pitch of 10 micro-meters. Still,<strong> enough for 135 film formats to deliver nearly 10 million pixels with true R-G-B each</strong>.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/nonbayer1.jpg" title="nikon non-bayer sensor"><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/nonbayer1small.jpg" align="middle" border="2" hspace="2" vspace="2" /></a></p>
<p>Of course, this birdie <strong>wouldn&#8217;t tell me where he gets his info from</strong>- so I can&#8217;t tell how much credence to give this one&#8230;</p>
<p>After chatting with him a little more, this means that the sensor would be roughly 7.2*3=21.6mp equivalent if you try to evaluate it in Bayer-sensor terms:</p>
<blockquote><p>You can say that. Since the interpretation of pixel counts is quite confusing right now, just say it will provide same if not better detail as the 20mp bayer-sensors, with much more accurate color pattern reproduction.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/28/non-bayer-dichroic-sensor-in-the-works-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CaptureNX - Can You Select From Different Printers?</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/28/capturenx-can-you-select-from-different-printers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/28/capturenx-can-you-select-from-different-printers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/28/capturenx-can-you-select-from-different-printers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A personal aside, if you will&#8211; I&#8217;ll be damned if CaptureNX 1.3 lets you select a printer to print to- it seems to always print to the default printer.
I can only get it to print to a different printer if I set Windows to default to the printer I want to use.
Presuming I&#8217;m right-you&#8217;re inconvenienced [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A personal aside, if you will&#8211; <strong>I&#8217;ll be damned if CaptureNX 1.3 lets you select a printer to print to</strong>- it seems to <strong>always </strong>print to the <em>default printer</em>.</p>
<p>I can only get it to print to a different printer if I set Windows to default to the printer I want to use.</p>
<p><em>Presuming I&#8217;m right</em>-you&#8217;re inconvenienced if you have say, a Laserjet for regular documents and a photo printer for pictures.</p>
<p>This is just plain amateur-hour - very lame. Hopefully this is fixed in V2. I also have to give them hell for not using the regular Windows help system- I can&#8217;t stand the Mac-type help- it&#8217;s just not easy to find anything without doing a search.</p>
<p>If I&#8217;m wrong here, please let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/28/capturenx-can-you-select-from-different-printers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D700 Unboxing Pictures- Comes With LCD Protector?</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/27/nikon-d700-unboxing-pictures-comes-with-lcd-protector/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/27/nikon-d700-unboxing-pictures-comes-with-lcd-protector/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 02:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/27/nikon-d700-unboxing-pictures-comes-with-lcd-protector/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What am I missing? Does the D700 come with an LCD protector? The D3 didn&#8217;t because they said you didn&#8217;t need it- the glass was extra hard&#8211; isn&#8217;t the D700 using the same LCD as the D3? Or are the Russions getting a protector just because?
Here.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/d700realsmall.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="133" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="120" />What am I missing? Does the D700 come with an LCD protector? The D3 didn&#8217;t because they said you didn&#8217;t need it- the glass was extra hard&#8211; isn&#8217;t the D700 using the same LCD as the D3? Or are the Russions getting a protector just because?</p>
<p><a href="http://journal.jpfast.net/364854.html?qtag=Nikon-D700-unboxing&amp;mode=reply">Here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/27/nikon-d700-unboxing-pictures-comes-with-lcd-protector/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D4- Mirrorless Viewfinder?</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/27/nikon-d4-mirrorless-viewfinder/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/27/nikon-d4-mirrorless-viewfinder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/27/nikon-d4-mirrorless-viewfinder/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Strange item from a Nikon list:
&#62;[When the D4 comes out]- Will this be when
&#62;a &#8220;mirrorless&#8221; viewfinder is developed?
When I asked a very senior Nikon person from Japan this same question last year, the answer was that we would be seeing a mirrorless dslr &#8220;sooner than you think&#8221;.
This is kind of strange, I&#8217;m not even sure [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/amazing78.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="256" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="180" />Strange item from a Nikon list:</p>
<blockquote><p>&gt;[When the D4 comes out]- Will this be when<br />
&gt;a &#8220;mirrorless&#8221; viewfinder is developed?</p>
<p>When I asked a <strong>very senior Nikon person from Japan</strong> this same question last year, the answer was that <strong>we would be seeing a <em>mirrorless dslr</em> &#8220;sooner than</strong><strong> you think&#8221;.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>This is kind of strange, I&#8217;m not even sure what &#8220;mirrorless dslr&#8221; means. I&#8217;m really hoping that it doesn&#8217;t mean that we get an electronic viewfinder instead- with liveview (finally), I&#8217;m not sure what the point would be.</p>
<p>Maybe they&#8217;re bringing back the pellicle mirror concept like they had on the <a href="http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/nikonf3ver2/variations/f3hspeed/index.htm">F3H</a>- here&#8217;s a good shot of the <a href="http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/nikonf3ver2/variations/f3hspeed/html/index.htm">pellicle mirror</a>.</p>
<p><strong>More guessing</strong>- if we have great noise-free images at higher ISO like we have on the D3- then the light falloff from the pellicle mirror is no longer an issue- and we have a sensor that can either shut itself off (so we don&#8217;t need a moving shutter) or use an LCD or similar to electronically prevent light from hitting the sensor, then <strong>we could have a VERY high-speed, camera that is nearly silent!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/27/nikon-d4-mirrorless-viewfinder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D700 - Unboxing Video</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/27/nikon-d700-unboxing-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/27/nikon-d700-unboxing-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/27/nikon-d700-unboxing-video/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Engadget points us to this D700 minisite which has a D700 unboxing video- you know, if you&#8217;re into that&#8230;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/d700realsmall.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="133" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="120" />Engadget points us to this D700 minisite which has a <a href="http://www.nikond700.com/2008/07/nikon-d700-unboxing-video/">D700 unboxing video</a>- you know, if you&#8217;re into that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/27/nikon-d700-unboxing-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon SB-900- She&#8217;s not big, she&#8217;s my flash! + Strobist Review</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/26/nikon-sb-900-shes-not-big-shes-my-flash-strobist-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/26/nikon-sb-900-shes-not-big-shes-my-flash-strobist-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 02:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/26/nikon-sb-900-shes-not-big-shes-my-flash-strobist-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Strobist is nice enough to show us a SB-800 next to an SB-900 and, as I&#8217;ve read elsewhere, it&#8217;s much bigger!
He also reviews the new flash here:
&#8230;
I got a chance to play with a new Nikon SB-900 speedlight over the last few days and I gotta say, it&#8217;s a pretty sweet flash. Long story [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Strobist is nice enough to <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/31454864@N00/2688241490/">show us a SB-800 next to an SB-900</a> and, as I&#8217;ve read elsewhere, it&#8217;s much bigger!</p>
<p><center><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/sb900.jpg" align="middle" border="2" height="400" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="332" /></center>He also <a href="http://strobist.blogspot.com/2008/07/review-nikon-sb-900-speedlight.html">reviews the new flash here</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;</p>
<p>I got a chance to play with a new Nikon SB-900 speedlight over the last few days an<strong>d I gotta say, it&#8217;s a pretty sweet flash.</strong> Long story short: <em>Nikon has just extended their lead in the flash department.</em><br />
&#8230;</p>
<p><span class="fullpost">First impression:<strong> It is much bigger than the SB-800</strong>. Didn&#8217;t really seem any heavier, but definitely takes up more space. </span><br />
&#8230;</p>
<p><span class="fullpost">It&#8217;s <strong>the most sophisticated refractor/reflector system I have ever seen on a flash</strong>. They actually <strong>modulate the tube with respect to both the front fresnel and the polished, rear reflector</strong>. This gives you the ability to shape the internal qualities of the beam, too. </span><br />
&#8230;</p>
<p><span class="fullpost">Big on the advantage list: <strong>Recycle time absolutely rocks at 2 seconds</strong> with no accessory battery back.</span><br />
&#8230;</p>
<p><span class="fullpost">The bar-coded Nikon gel thing is a little gimmicky &#8212; it sets your camera&#8217;s WB to the &#8220;appropriate&#8221; setting. The special Nikon gels could easily be duped with a template and some liquid paper. You will not need to re-up with the official Nikon gels ($$) if you do not want to.</span><br />
&#8230;</p>
<p><span class="fullpost">Goofy, but cool: <strong>At full power, the discharge sounds like a blaster from Star War</strong>s (&#8221;<em>pew, pew, pew</em>&#8220;). Recycling is almost silent. And oh-so-fast.</span><br />
&#8230;</p>
<p><span class="fullpost">A <strong>&#8220;thermometer&#8221; in the rear display shows you if you are starting to red-line it.</strong></span><br />
&#8230;</p>
<p><span class="fullpost">The <strong>hot shoe is a new, thicker size that will not fit many current accessory shoes</strong>. McNally <a href="http://www.joemcnally.com/blog/2008/07/01/just-when-we-figured-out-the-800/" target="_new">dropped one</a> out of a Justin Clamp, which is a staple lighting tool. </span><br />
&#8230;</p>
<p><span class="fullpost">The <strong>new AS-21 foot must be used because of the new shoe size.</strong></span><br />
&#8230;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/26/nikon-sb-900-shes-not-big-shes-my-flash-strobist-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon SB-900 Flash- Shoe is Thicker Than Normal? Causing Problems?</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/26/nikon-sb-900-flash-shoe-is-thicker-than-normal-causing-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/26/nikon-sb-900-flash-shoe-is-thicker-than-normal-causing-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 02:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/26/nikon-sb-900-flash-shoe-is-thicker-than-normal-causing-problems/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
[Update: Confirmed per the Strobist. See the next post.]
This thread on flickr is stating that the SB-900 flash has a thicker shoe than the SB-800 and similar flashes and apparently, this is causing trouble for people who try and mount the flash directly to various accessories.
The SB-600 not only drops a pin into a hole [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/amazing77.jpg" align="left" border="2" hspace="2" vspace="2" /><a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/strobist/discuss/72157606368129813/"></a></p>
<p>[<strong>Update</strong>: Confirmed per the Strobist. <a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/26/nikon-sb-900-shes-not-big-shes-my-flash-strobist-review/">See the next post</a>.]</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/strobist/discuss/72157606368129813/">This thread on flickr</a> is stating that the SB-900 flash has a thicker shoe than the SB-800 and similar flashes and apparently, this is causing trouble for people who try and mount the flash directly to various accessories.</p>
<blockquote><p>The SB-600 not only drops a pin into a hole like David Hobby mentioned, but <strong>also raises two (very) small clamps from the level of the metal base, e.g. to prevent falling out of non-Nikon accessories.<br />
</strong><br />
It <strong>looks like it&#8217;s the same for the SB-900 &#8230;</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>I haven&#8217;t seen this mentioned anywhere else, however, some I&#8217;m filing it under Rumors for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/26/nikon-sb-900-flash-shoe-is-thicker-than-normal-causing-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Phase1 Medium-Format Backs Take Dry-Ice and 1000lb of Truck!</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/26/phase1-medium-format-backs-take-dry-ice-and-1000lb-of-truck/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/26/phase1-medium-format-backs-take-dry-ice-and-1000lb-of-truck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 23:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[The Competition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/26/phase1-medium-format-backs-take-dry-ice-and-1000lb-of-truck/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow! Phase1&#8217;s head of R&#38;D shows their digital backs working after being frozen in dry-ice for half an hour and also working with 1000lb&#8217;s (or so, that&#8217;s ~453kg) of an SUV on top of them.
You have to admire their willingness to destroy $30-$50k worth of camera backs. I wish I had one, I wouldn&#8217;t treat [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! Phase1&#8217;s head of R&amp;D shows their digital backs working <a href="http://www.phaseone.com/Content/p1digitalbacks/Pplusseries/Extreme/Cold.aspx">after being frozen in dry-ice</a> for half an hour and also <a href="http://www.phaseone.com/Content/p1digitalbacks/Pplusseries/Extreme/Strength.aspx">working with 1000lb&#8217;s (or so, that&#8217;s ~453kg) of an SUV</a> on top of them.</p>
<p>You have to admire their willingness to destroy $30-$50k worth of camera backs. I wish I had one, I wouldn&#8217;t treat it half as harshly as that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/26/phase1-medium-format-backs-take-dry-ice-and-1000lb-of-truck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Nikon This&#8221;, &#8220;Nikon That&#8221;, wtf?</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/26/nikon-this-nikon-that-wtf/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/26/nikon-this-nikon-that-wtf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 05:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/26/nikon-this-nikon-that-wtf/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may have noticed that I&#8217;m starting to write &#8220;Nikon&#8221; in front of lots of stuff, eg- &#8220;Nikon D700&#8243;, &#8220;Nikon SB-900&#8243;, etc.
This is to try and help this site get a little higher on the list of searches, so do me a favor and go ahead and ignore it.
Sorry to have to be overly verbose, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may have noticed that I&#8217;m starting to write &#8220;Nikon&#8221; in front of lots of stuff, eg- &#8220;Nikon D700&#8243;, &#8220;Nikon SB-900&#8243;, etc.</p>
<p>This is to try and help this site get a little higher on the list of searches, so do me a favor and go ahead and ignore it.</p>
<p>Sorry to have to be overly verbose, we KNOW a D700 is a Nikon product but most people search for &#8220;nikon d700&#8243;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/26/nikon-this-nikon-that-wtf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D3x - Early Version at the Olympics? 24.4mp- Release End of 2008?</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/26/nikon-d3x-early-version-at-the-olympics-244mp-release-end-of-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/26/nikon-d3x-early-version-at-the-olympics-244mp-release-end-of-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 04:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/26/nikon-d3x-early-version-at-the-olympics-244mp-release-end-of-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m having a hard time believing that it&#8217;ll be 24.4mp- I&#8217;m think it&#8217;ll be a bit larger, but:
 Although the rumors were strong for an announcement of the 24MP D3x/4 around end of august early september, it looks like its a no show. 
I was contacted by an old friend who works for nikon, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m having a hard time believing that<a href="http://nikongear.com/smf/index.php?topic=10812.0"> it&#8217;ll be 24.4mp</a>- I&#8217;m think it&#8217;ll be a bit larger, but:</p>
<blockquote><p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/amazing76.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="256" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="174" /> Although the rumors were strong for an announcement of the 24MP<strong> D3x/4 around end of august early september, it looks like its a no show. </strong></p>
<p>I was contacted by <strong>an old friend who works for nikon</strong>, and even though <strong>the 24.4MP camera is going around and will be at the olympics</strong> (from what i understood still only as an early prototype),<strong> there is no intention of bringing it into production until after the end of 2008.</strong></p>
<p>When I asked him repeatedly if he was sure, <strong>he insisted in a very confident matter</strong>, that if nikon was going to announce something that big in the time frame given he would have known. I insisted that there had to be some truth in the august rumor, and this time he said: &#8220;if its true, then they will surprise everyone, including official dealers - the only thing to come next is the full range of new coolpix cameras&#8221; &#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, I also thought August was super unlikely- just too close to the D3 and D700.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/26/nikon-d3x-early-version-at-the-olympics-244mp-release-end-of-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D700 Hands-on Quickee Review</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/26/nikon-d700-hands-on-quickee-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/26/nikon-d700-hands-on-quickee-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 04:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/26/nikon-d700-hands-on-quickee-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[InfoBorder has some close-up shots of the D700 compared to the D300 and a quick write-up here.
&#8230;To flatten the ongoing 95% viewfinder discussions: In my opinion the 95% of the FX (D700) looks *much better* than the 100% of the DX (D300) body - and the D300 viewfinder is actually quite good&#8230;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/d700realsmall.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="133" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="120" />InfoBorder has some close-up shots of the D700 compared to the D300 and <a href="http://www.infoborder.com/Digital_Camera_review/Nikon/D700/">a quick write-up here</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;To flatten the ongoing 95% viewfinder discussions: In my opinion<strong> the 95% of the FX (D700) looks *much better* than the 100% of the DX (D300) bod</strong>y - and the D300 viewfinder is actually quite good&#8230;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/26/nikon-d700-hands-on-quickee-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon SB-900 Flash&#8217;s- Shipping</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/25/nikon-sb-900-flashs-shipping/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/25/nikon-sb-900-flashs-shipping/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/25/nikon-sb-900-flashs-shipping/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m seeing reports that the SB-900 flash&#8217;s are starting to appear in stock in various places.
Plug: B&#38;H still doesn&#8217;t have them yet though- and they&#8217;re the only shop I trust to be truthful about whether they actually have them or not. When their system says it&#8217;s in stock, it&#8217;s in stock.
If you&#8217;d like to support [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m seeing reports that the SB-900 flash&#8217;s are starting to appear in stock in various places.</p>
<p>Plug: B&amp;H still doesn&#8217;t have them yet though- and they&#8217;re the only shop I trust to be truthful about whether they actually have them or not. When their system says it&#8217;s in stock, it&#8217;s in stock.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;d like to support Nikon Watch and give me a few pennies, then do me a favor and click a B&amp;H ad (like at the top of the page) then place your order like normal.</p>
<p>[Note: this is <em>not</em> a request for you to click a google ad. Urging you to do that violates their policies and I won&#8217;t.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/25/nikon-sb-900-flashs-shipping/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D700&#8217;s Shipping!</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/24/d700s-shipping/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/24/d700s-shipping/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 02:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/24/d700s-shipping/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is all- carry on.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/d700real.jpg" align="middle" border="2" height="468" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="420" /></center>That is all- carry on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/24/d700s-shipping/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D900 Is Coming - More Megapixels</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/23/nikon-d900-is-coming-more-megapixels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/23/nikon-d900-is-coming-more-megapixels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/23/nikon-d900-is-coming-more-megapixels/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ A little birdie says:
 After the D700, the D900 will be on the way with more megapixels.  This is a rumor from a friend who has connections to Nikon office in my country.
So maybe the D900 will end up being the &#8220;halfway&#8221; megapixel camera with ~18mp- halfway between the D3&#8217;s/D700&#8217;s light sucking 12mp and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/amazing75.jpg" align="left" border="2" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> A little birdie says:</p>
<blockquote><p> After the D700, <strong>the D900 will be on the way with more megapixels</strong>.  This is a <strong>rumor from a friend who has connections to Nikon office</strong> in my country.</p></blockquote>
<p>So maybe the D900 will end up being the &#8220;halfway&#8221; megapixel camera with ~18mp- halfway between the D3&#8217;s/D700&#8217;s light sucking 12mp and the (presumably) 24-28mp D3x&#8217;s not-quite light sucking sensor.</p>
<p>But who knows? There&#8217;s a lot of wiggle room between 12mp and 24-28 or so.</p>
<p>It&#8217;d also be interesting to see two body styles from now on- really fast, huge  pro body- D3 and the half-sized, same sensor, not quite as fast prosumer body like the D700.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/23/nikon-d900-is-coming-more-megapixels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D700&#8217;s Ready to Ship!</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/22/nikon-d700s-ready-to-ship/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/22/nikon-d700s-ready-to-ship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/22/nikon-d700s-ready-to-ship/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A little birdie writes:
 Nikon shows us having 2 D700 bodies on pending release. That usually means
they will ship any day so expect them to hit the market in the next few
days.
It&#8217;s nice to see that Nikon appears to be good about keeping this retail channel!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonWatch.com/images/amazing74.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="256" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="183" />A little birdie writes:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong> Nikon shows us having 2 D700 bodies on pending release</strong>. That <strong>usually means<br />
they will ship any day</strong> so expect them to hit the market in the next few<br />
days.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s nice to see that Nikon appears to be good about keeping this retail channel!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/22/nikon-d700s-ready-to-ship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Better Nikon D700 90.25% (95%) Viewfinder Coverage Representation</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/21/better-nikon-d700-9025-95-viewfinder-coverage-representation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/21/better-nikon-d700-9025-95-viewfinder-coverage-representation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 03:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/21/better-nikon-d700-9025-95-viewfinder-coverage-representation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Martin saw my attempts at showing you the difference in viewfinder coverage between the Nikon D3 and the D700 and thought that he might be able to better. I&#8217;m still partial to my attempt, but admit defeat.
Here he shows you the practical difference in coverage between the D3 and the D700:
He points out that this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin saw <a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/20/d700-viewfinder-coverage/">my attempts at showing you the difference in viewfinder coverage</a> between the Nikon D3 and the D700 and thought that he might be able to better. I&#8217;m still partial to my attempt, but admit defeat.</p>
<p>Here he shows you the practical difference in coverage between the D3 and the D700:</p>
<p><center><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/d700vf.jpg" align="middle" border="2" height="180" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="270" /></center>He points out that this is larger than life-size and in the actual camera, there&#8217;d be an even smaller practical difference. In this case, I agree with others that the difference just won&#8217;t be an issue when you&#8217;re shooting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/21/better-nikon-d700-9025-95-viewfinder-coverage-representation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Xavier Gets to Use a Pre-Release Nikon D700, Likes It, Provides Sample Shots!</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/21/xavier-gets-to-use-a-pre-release-nikon-d700-likes-it-provides-sample-shots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/21/xavier-gets-to-use-a-pre-release-nikon-d700-likes-it-provides-sample-shots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 02:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/21/xavier-gets-to-use-a-pre-release-nikon-d700-likes-it-provides-sample-shots/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Xavier is a lucky bastard who&#8217;s gotten to use a D700 before the rest of us plebes and writes:
 Hello Matt,
[There] are lucky guys like me that can use new cameras before they are actually on sale&#8230;.
I &#8220;played&#8221; with the D700 this week end, taking pictures of my lovely Rose, a 5 and 1/2
month old [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/d700realsmall.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="133" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="120" />Xavier is a lucky bastard who&#8217;s gotten to use a D700 before the rest of us plebes and writes:</p>
<blockquote><p> Hello Matt,<br />
[There] are lucky guys like me that can use new cameras before they are actually on sale&#8230;.</p>
<p><strong>I &#8220;played&#8221; with the D700 this week end, </strong>taking pictures of my lovely Rose, a 5 and 1/2<br />
month old australian sherpherd, at the park of Sevres, near Paris.<br />
I [used] the camera as it was given to me, meaning, in <strong>program, auto white balance, regular<br />
autofocus, etc. I only changed the ISO according to the amont of light available.<br />
</strong><br />
I must say that <strong>it is extremely comfortable to re-use the 36&#215;24 finder even if this one &#8220;only&#8221; cover 95% of the frame </strong>(frankly for years i used the F100 and 95% never really bother that much. But for some specific photography i can understand the need). the<strong> view finder is clear and crisp, and you can see right away if you are in focus or not.</strong></p>
<p>The <strong>autofocus is fast and acurate</strong>. But really, my D200 was too, and I think Nikon came up with the most reliable autofocus ever. Even in low light and low contrast, the autofocus works perfectly. It is great not to hear anything moving and ending up with sharp pictures.</p>
<p>The lens- the recent 24-70/2.8 - already fantastic on my D200 is being even better. Silence, speed and acuracy along with good control of lens imperfections bring this zoom to the top. (actually today, i&#8217;m going to use the 14-24 and the 70-200 so more pix to come)</p>
<p>All combined, a good light measuring, a great aufocus, an excellent auto white balance and, above all, a super fast response when  riggering the shutter make this equipment worth to be bought. I am looking forward to use it in extrem cold weather to see how it will react.</p>
<p>Of course, there are little things that people would expect, but <strong>overall, this camera IS FANTASTIC</strong>, as always with this brand.</p>
<p>What i like: Everything</p>
<p>What i don&#8217;t like: the price (of course!)</p>
<p>I send you several shots of puppy Rose&#8230;.at the park and at home&#8230;.</p></blockquote>
<p>Here&#8217;s the shot I like the best:</p>
<p><center><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/d700realworldsidewalk.jpg" align="middle" border="2" hspace="2" vspace="2" /></center>You can also <a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/d700realworldsamples.zip" title="nikon d700 realworld shots">get all of this shots (jpg only, unfortunately) in this Zip file</a> (~13 meg).</p>
<p>He&#8217;s got some <a href="http://www.xavierlhospice.com/pages/pictures.html" title="nikon portfolio shots">nicer shots from his portfolio here</a>. Hey! Is that <a href="http://www.xavierlhospice.com/pages/news1.html#">Paul McCartney</a>?</p>
<p>Thanks X! If you get a D3x before we do, please send us some shots of that too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/21/xavier-gets-to-use-a-pre-release-nikon-d700-likes-it-provides-sample-shots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New &#8220;Vivid&#8221; Picture Control for D3, D700, D300</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/20/new-vivid-picture-control-for-d3-d700-d300/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/20/new-vivid-picture-control-for-d3-d700-d300/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[OFFICIAL F'ING NEWS!!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/20/new-vivid-picture-control-for-d3-d700-d300/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nikon has put out a new picture control (changes the colors, etc) for the D3, D700, and D300 that they claim will make nice vivid land and cityscapes! I haven&#8217;t tried it yet- I&#8217;ll let you know when I do.
If only I could get (for free) the look of Velvia and (my personal favorite of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://nikonimglib.com/opc/landscape/index.html.en#os-windows">Nikon has put out a new picture control </a>(changes the colors, etc) for the D3, D700, and D300 that they claim will make nice vivid land and cityscapes! I haven&#8217;t tried it yet- I&#8217;ll let you know when I do.</p>
<p>If only I could get (for free) the look of Velvia and (my personal favorite of all time) Provia 100iso with a polarizer.</p>
<p><a href="http://nikonimglib.com/opc/manual/en/opc_win_en_ABF.html">Here are the installation directions</a>- basically, extract it to a card, tell the camera to load it via the menus.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;m a couple days behind on this one, but thanks to Dexter for reminding me about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/20/new-vivid-picture-control-for-d3-d700-d300/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D700 Viewfinder Coverage - 90.25% of the Full Image</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/20/d700-viewfinder-coverage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/20/d700-viewfinder-coverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/20/d700-viewfinder-coverage/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok- based on the great comments by you guys, I think I&#8217;ve gotten what Bjorn&#8217;s saying when he refers to linear vs planar.
After many hours of work, I have come up with a picture to demonstrate the difference:
(I don&#8217;t have my normal graphics tools with me, so MS Paint is what you get today- and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok- based on the great comments by you guys, I think I&#8217;ve gotten what Bjorn&#8217;s saying when he refers to linear vs planar.</p>
<p>After many hours of work, I have come up with a picture to demonstrate the difference:<br />
<center><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/d700viewfinderpercentages.jpg" align="middle" border="2" hspace="2" vspace="2" /></center>(I don&#8217;t have my normal graphics tools with me, so MS Paint is what you get today- and <strong>yes</strong>, it did require quite a lot of effort to not draw boobs and planes dropping bombs.)So basically- the outer red box is a 100% viewfinder image- you see everything. The inner red box is what Nikon claims to be a 95% viewfinder coverage. In reality (per Bjorn), if both sides of your rectangle are 95% of the full image, then you&#8217;ve really got 90.25% coverage of the full viewfinder image because that 90.25% is the full surface area of the sensor.So this means that (presuming Bjorn is correct, and who am I to question?), the D700 sacrifices ~10% of the total image in the viewfinder in order to give you a sensor cleaner.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t a great thing- if the cleaner works, I need it, but I also need the full image in the viewfinder- I <strong>hate </strong>having to guess what I&#8217;m going to get in a shot with other cameras I have that don&#8217;t show you 100% of the image in the viewfinder.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m betting we&#8217;ll eventually (D3x? D4? F7?) see a huge viewfinder with both sensor cleaner / shaker and 100% coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/20/d700-viewfinder-coverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D700 / D3 Side By Side Comparison Shots</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/17/d700-d3-side-by-side-comparison-shots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/17/d700-d3-side-by-side-comparison-shots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 02:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/17/d700-d3-side-by-side-comparison-shots/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are some very nice side by side shots from a Japanese site:

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are some very nice <a href="http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/review/2008/07/07/8793.html">side by side shots from a Japanese site</a>:<br />
<center><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/d700d3sidebyside.jpg" align="middle" border="2" height="200" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="400" /></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/17/d700-d3-side-by-side-comparison-shots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bjorn Reviews the Nikon D700</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/17/bjorn-reviews-the-nikon-d700/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/17/bjorn-reviews-the-nikon-d700/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 02:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/17/bjorn-reviews-the-nikon-d700/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bjørn Rørslett (Norway) is very interesting- everytime I read something from him, there&#8217;ll be something in there that makes me think either, &#8220;He&#8217;s bullshitting&#8221; or &#8220;I&#8217;m not certain what he&#8217;s talking about&#8221;. I always believe it&#8217;s the latter, but it always strikes me as the former.
So for example, this time he&#8217;s found out that the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/d700realsmall.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="133" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="120" />Bjørn Rørslett (Norway) is very interesting- everytime I read something from him, there&#8217;ll be something in there that makes me think either, &#8220;He&#8217;s bullshitting&#8221; or &#8220;I&#8217;m not certain what he&#8217;s talking about&#8221;. I always believe it&#8217;s the latter, but it always strikes me as the former.</p>
<p>So for example, this time <a href="http://nikongear.com/smf/index.php?topic=10771.0;topicseen">he&#8217;s found out that the way they&#8217;re measuring the viewfinder coverage really equates to 90% coverage</a>, not 95% (bolding is mine, making text red is his):</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;here is <span style="text-decoration: underline">the definite answer to the question of viewfinder coverage</span>: the <strong>95% figure is <span style="color: red">NOT</span> a planar measure</strong> as it should be, <strong>but linear. <span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 1.3em"><span style="color: red">Hence actual frame coverage is 90%</span></span></strong>. This figure <strong>will vary slightly with the actual lens used</strong>. I tested with the 45/2.8 PC-E. Traditionally, frame coverage is specified for a 50 mm lens at infinity.<br />
&#8230;<br />
A new confirmation: The<strong> dust reduction assemblage adds a frame structure inside the mirror box</strong>, just in front of the shutter curtain. This might be a stop for the shaking system? Whatever the explanation, <strong>it is clear that this frame will mask the finder slightly</strong>. This lends support to the <strong>explanation I got from Nikon techs earlier that the dust-removal system was responsible for the slight reduction in finder coverage on the D700</strong>, NOT the built-in flash since the prism heads appears to be large enough on its own.</p></blockquote>
<p>I really have no idea what the difference between planar and linear is in this context, but I&#8217;ll accept his word for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/17/bjorn-reviews-the-nikon-d700/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D700 - Endo-Skeleton</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/17/d700-endo-skeleton/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/17/d700-endo-skeleton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 01:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/17/d700-endo-skeleton/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Terminator is one of the best movies ever, if you ask me&#8211; there&#8217;s just no way not to look at the endoskeleton Terminator and say, &#8220;Wow, that&#8217;s cool!&#8221; Which is likely why I love the shots of the D700 (and the other Nikon bodies) in all of its magnesium glory before it gets painted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Terminator is one of the best movies ever, if you ask me&#8211; there&#8217;s just no way not to look at the endoskeleton Terminator and say, &#8220;Wow, that&#8217;s cool!&#8221; Which is likely why I love the shots of the D700 (and the other Nikon bodies) in all of its magnesium glory before it gets painted and padded in rubber which easily comes off.<br />
<center><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/terminator.jpg" align="middle" border="2" height="569" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="251" /></center> <center><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/d700skeleton1.jpg" align="middle" border="2" height="433" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="400" /></center> <center><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/d700skeleton2.jpg" align="middle" border="2" height="518" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="413" /></center> <center><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/d700skeleton3.jpg" align="middle" border="2" height="367" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="400" /></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/17/d700-endo-skeleton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PMA 2008 - Thom Has Some Inside Info? D3x, f/1.4 Primes, P6000</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/17/pma-2008-thom-has-some-inside-info-d3x-f14-primes-p6000/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/17/pma-2008-thom-has-some-inside-info-d3x-f14-primes-p6000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 01:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/17/pma-2008-thom-has-some-inside-info-d3x-f14-primes-p6000/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thom reports:
 On some Internet forums I posted that I thought the high resolution FX body might be in the D700-sized body. Apparently not. I received a message out of Japan that the high-resolution camera [ed: presumedly the d3x] is in the D3 body. I trust that message more than my guess, though please note [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/amazing73.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="256" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="185" /><a href="http://www.bythom.com/">Thom reports</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"> On some Internet forums I posted that I thought the high resolution FX body might be in the D700-sized body. Apparently not. <strong>I received a message out of Japan that the high-resolution camera [ed: presumedly the d3x] is in the D3 body</strong>. I trust that message more than my guess, though please note that having one (usually good) source does not mean something is verified<strong>. A few f/1.4 primes apparently will appear with that body</strong>. <strong>A Coolpix with raw capabilities was also mentioned</strong>, which would align with the P6000 rumors (<strong>13+mp, 28-112mm ED VR, optional GPS and LAN</strong>).  </font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><strong>Others are predicting a 24-120mm VRII and 70-200mm VRII</strong>. That would be nice, but <strong>I am not holding my breath</strong>. Note that even <strong>three or four primes would put Nikon well over their usual yearly lens quota</strong>. On the other hand, every one of the next batch of lenses I hear about seem to be just G, AF-S, and/or VR iterations of existing designs&#8230;</font></p></blockquote>
<p>I see the D3x, I also see the P6000 or something like it to try and compete with Canon&#8217;s G9, I&#8217;m hoping for the primes but I&#8217;m not holding my breath or placing any money on it. The p6000 keeps getting mentioned with &#8220;LAN&#8221; capability- the French magazine had that in their feature list- I think this needs to be translated as &#8220;built-in WiFi&#8221; like on other Nikon Coolpix&#8217;s rather than an ethernet LAN connection.</p>
<p>I suppose the 24-120mm augment the 18-200mm? I&#8217;m betting it won&#8217;t be a pro/fixed aperture lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/17/pma-2008-thom-has-some-inside-info-d3x-f14-primes-p6000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D700 Compared to the Canon EOS 5D</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/15/nikon-d700-compared-to-the-canon-eos-5d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/15/nikon-d700-compared-to-the-canon-eos-5d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/15/nikon-d700-compared-to-the-canon-eos-5d/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m marking this as a rumor because I can&#8217;t see that the D700 can be that bad- the 100% crops are not anywhere near sharp compared to the 5D, it just can&#8217;t be that bad.
Here&#8217;s the translated version (in Japanese I&#8217;m told it&#8217;s Chinese, sorry, they look very similar to me!) I think/hope that they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/amazing72.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="256" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="185" />I&#8217;m marking this as a rumor because I can&#8217;t see that the D700 can be that bad- the 100% crops are not anywhere near sharp compared to the 5D, it just can&#8217;t be that bad.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Finfo.xitek.com%2F1%2F2008%2F0707%2F3001.shtml&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;sl=ja&amp;tl=en">translated version</a> (in <strike><a href="http://info.xitek.com/1/2008/0707/3001.shtml">Japanese</a></strike> I&#8217;m told it&#8217;s Chinese, sorry, they look very similar to me!) I think/hope that they just hosed up the comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/15/nikon-d700-compared-to-the-canon-eos-5d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Selects Nikon for 32nm Chips</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/13/intel-selects-nikon-for-32nm-chips/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/13/intel-selects-nikon-for-32nm-chips/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 22:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[OFFICIAL F'ING NEWS!!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/13/intel-selects-nikon-for-32nm-chips/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to Alberto on dpReview for pointing this out:
&#8230;At 32-nm, Nikon has reportedly won the entire lithography business within Intel, leaving ASML out in the cold, source said. The multi-million-dollar order represents Intel&#8217;s initial scanners, based on immersion lithography. Up until now, Intel had been using &#8221;dry&#8221; scanners for wafer processing within its fabs.
At 45-nm, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/nikonlogosmall.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="176" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="176" />Thanks to Alberto on dpReview for <a href="http://www.eetimes.com/news/semi/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=JD1MDBHCNLH1EQSNDLOSKH0CJUNN2JVN?articleID=208803035">pointing this out</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;At 32-nm, Nikon has reportedly won the entire lithography business within Intel, leaving ASML out in the cold, source said. The multi-million-dollar order represents Intel&#8217;s initial scanners, based on immersion lithography. Up until now, Intel had been using &#8221;dry&#8221; scanners for wafer processing within its fabs.</p>
<p>At 45-nm, Intel has been using a combination of 193-nm dry tools from both ASML and Nikon for the so-called &#8221;critical layers,&#8221; sources said. For the non-critical layers, Intel has been exclusively using Nikon&#8217;s 248-nm scanners for use in processing wafers at the 45-nm node, sources said&#8230;.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m not a hardware guy, so I can&#8217;t speak with any authority, but from what I understand- the features on chips below 45nm are really hard to get right with the typical lithography where the image is projected through gases onto the chip. So they&#8217;re moving to projecting the image into liquid which modifies how the light hits the chip and makes it much more likely to get decent yields.</p>
<p>The article says that <strong>cost was a major deciding factor</strong> in favor of Nikon over ASML.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/13/intel-selects-nikon-for-32nm-chips/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D700 Real-world Shots- Extreme Weather</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/13/nikon-d700-real-world-shots-extreme-weather/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/13/nikon-d700-real-world-shots-extreme-weather/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 22:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/13/nikon-d700-real-world-shots-extreme-weather/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nikon gave pro Jim Reed a D700 for him to shoot some extreme weather. Apparently, the D700 takes pretty decent shots  
His gallery is here.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/d700realsmall.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="133" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="120" />Nikon gave pro Jim Reed a D700 for him to shoot some extreme weather. Apparently, the D700 takes pretty decent shots <img src='http://www.nikonwatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>His <a href="http://www.jimreedphoto.com/gallery.html?gallery=New%20Nikon%20D700">gallery is here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/13/nikon-d700-real-world-shots-extreme-weather/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D3x Launch in October?</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/09/nikon-d3x-launch-in-october/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/09/nikon-d3x-launch-in-october/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/09/nikon-d3x-launch-in-october/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One-off report of the launch / announcement of the D3x / D4:
 My local dealer *wink, wink* told me yesterday that if he had to &#8220;cough, cough&#8221; guess, then the D3x/D4 would most likely launch in October which will give Sony a month with its A900 camera since they are using the same sensor.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One-off report of the <a href="http://nikongear.com/smf/index.php?topic=10712.0">launch / announcement of the D3x / D4</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/amazing71.jpg" align="left" border="2" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> My <strong>local dealer *wink, wink* told me yesterday</strong> that if he had to &#8220;cough, cough&#8221; guess, the<strong>n the D3x/D4 would most likely launch in October</strong> which will give Sony a month with its A900 camera since they are using the same sensor.  It makes some sense.</p></blockquote>
<p>I have a hard time buying it- dealers don&#8217;t seem to know much more than we do these days (as far as I can tell, feel free to correct me).</p>
<p>Otoh- that would make it roughly a year after the D3 announcement so&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/09/nikon-d3x-launch-in-october/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Noise Comparison- D3 vs D700</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/09/noise-comparison-d3-vs-d700/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/09/noise-comparison-d3-vs-d700/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 23:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/09/noise-comparison-d3-vs-d700/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m pretty sure this comparison doesn&#8217;t need to be done- presuming they&#8217;re using the same sensor (they are) and they&#8217;re using the same image processing ASICs- eXpeed (they are), but the Japanese didn&#8217;t let that stop them
Here&#8217;s a comparison of the noise at ISO&#8217;s from 1,600 - 25,600 with both the D3 and the D700 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/noise.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="178" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="240" />I&#8217;m pretty sure this comparison doesn&#8217;t need to be done- presuming they&#8217;re using the same sensor (they are) and they&#8217;re using the same image processing ASICs- eXpeed (they are), but the Japanese didn&#8217;t let that stop them</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a <a href="http://66.102.9.104/translate_c?hl=en&amp;sl=ja&amp;tl=en&amp;u=http://www.digital1gan.com/2008/07/nikon_d700d3.html&amp;usg=ALkJrhjSDKEJieKkKf-QVFfZKtILxoS5xg">comparison of the noise at ISO&#8217;s from 1,600 - 25,600</a> with both the D3 and the D700 (translated, <a href="http://www.digital1gan.com/2008/07/nikon_d700d3.html">original</a>).</p>
<p>Looks the same to my eye, but that&#8217;s the point, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/09/noise-comparison-d3-vs-d700/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coolpix P6000- Whoops- Missed Something - PIXEL BINNING</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/09/coolpix-p6000-whoops-missed-something-pixel-binning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/09/coolpix-p6000-whoops-missed-something-pixel-binning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/09/coolpix-p6000-whoops-missed-something-pixel-binning/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[D&#8217;oh! Late last night, I completely forgot that you absolutely could use the 13mp on that (potentially real) Coolpix P6000 without a ton of noise by using pixel-binning.
Basically- take a few adjacent photo-receptors, get their values, and munge them together. I&#8217;m presuming it&#8217;ll be much smarter than just an averaging, but who knows, so I&#8217;ll [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/noise.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="178" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="240" />D&#8217;oh! Late last night, I completely forgot that you absolutely could use the 13mp on that (potentially real) Coolpix P6000 without a ton of noise by using <a href="http://www.ccd.com/ccd103.html">pixel-binning</a>.</p>
<p>Basically- <strong>take a few adjacent photo-receptors, get their values, and munge them together</strong>. I&#8217;m presuming it&#8217;ll be much smarter than just an averaging, but who knows, so I&#8217;ll use the term &#8220;munge&#8221;.</p>
<p>In theory, you just increased the sensitivity of the sensor, but decreased the resolution. So maybe if we munge it down to an effective 3-4mp image, we might get a lot less noise than you&#8217;d expect, which would be fantastic. Most of the times I&#8217;m going to use a P&amp;S are in situations where the lighting is terrible (think parties) and the shots aren&#8217;t likely to be worth bringing out the D3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/09/coolpix-p6000-whoops-missed-something-pixel-binning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D800? New Coolpix P6000?</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/09/d800-new-coolpix-p6000/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/09/d800-new-coolpix-p6000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 04:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/09/d800-new-coolpix-p6000/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m starting to see fakes of the &#8220;D800&#8220;. I&#8217;m betting that the likelihood of these being real is just about nil- I can&#8217;t possibly imagine Nikon putting out another bother so soon about the D700, so I&#8217;m going to keep an eye on it and see where it goes. I also don&#8217;t want to report [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/amazing70.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="256" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="179" />I&#8217;m starting to see fakes of the &#8220;<strong>D800</strong>&#8220;. I&#8217;m betting that the likelihood of these being real is just about nil- I can&#8217;t possibly imagine Nikon putting out another bother so soon about the D700, so I&#8217;m going to keep an eye on it and see where it goes. <strong>I also don&#8217;t want to report on every single damned wing-nut who goes and spends 20 minutes in Photoshop!</strong> Leave that to the other guy.</p>
<p>And over at Luminous Landscape and other places, we&#8217;re seeing a shot of a possible <a href="http://www.luminous-landscape.com/whatsnew/">new Coolpix P6000</a> that actually looks like a smaller rip-off of the Canon G series. I&#8217;ve got a G3 and it is/was a really cool camera (for 2004).</p>
<p>Ordinarily, I don&#8217;t report on Coolpixs because Nikon comes out with Coolpix&#8217;s so frequently and they&#8217;re so uninspired that it&#8217;d be like reporting that I got up in the morning, but this one&#8217;s got (supposedly):</p>
<ul>
<li>13.5 MP sensor</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>28-112mm 4X zoom</li>
<li>VR optical image stabilization</li>
<li>Raw Mode</li>
<li>ISO to 6400</li>
<li>optical viewfinder</li>
<li><a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/08/07/08/nikon.coolpix.p6000.leak/">GPS</a> (?)</li>
<li>Can use the SB-800 (SB-900 too? No reports of CLS though.)</li>
<li>LAN something or other? (I&#8217;m guessing it&#8217;s a wifi connection with an up-sell to a hosting service like we&#8217;ve seen on the other Coolpix&#8217;s)</li>
</ul>
<p>13.5mp @ 6400iso huh? Remember that paper where the researchers grabbed a couple webcams, taped them over so they couldn&#8217;t see anything and then used the images as cheap sources of truly random (though not nec. uniformly distributed) numbers? Yeah, a 13.5mp coolpix would make a really good source of random noise! August release, guess we&#8217;ll know soon enough.</p>
<p>But raw mode&#8217;s cool! If only Nikon provided a free SDK so that I could make my own intervalometer code, and other fun stuff, then it&#8217;d be just about as good as a Canon G-series&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/09/d800-new-coolpix-p6000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So What&#8217;s the D3&#8217;s Dealer / Wholesale Price?</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/09/so-whats-the-d3s-dealer-wholesale-price/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/09/so-whats-the-d3s-dealer-wholesale-price/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 04:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/09/so-whats-the-d3s-dealer-wholesale-price/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bit ago, a really super-nice birdie told me what the D3&#8217;s minimum advertised price (MAP) was. The MAP is the lowest price that you can quote in an advertisement. So when you see those &#8220;Prices too low to advertise!&#8221; or &#8220;Click here to see a lower price&#8221;, it&#8217;s because they&#8217;re selling lower than the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/amazing69.jpg" align="left" border="2" height="256" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="183" />A bit ago, a really super-nice birdie <a href="http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/01/d700-prices-list-and-minimum-advertised-price/">told me what the D3&#8217;s minimum advertised price (MAP) was</a>. The MAP is the lowest price that you can quote in an advertisement. So when you see those &#8220;Prices too low to advertise!&#8221; or &#8220;Click here to see a lower price&#8221;, it&#8217;s because they&#8217;re selling lower than the MAP (presumedly).</p>
<p>So this birdie clearly had a product price dump from the <a href="https://www.nikondealernet.com/default.asp">official Nikon Dealer site</a> and I asked if he could give me the wholesale. Unfortunately, he wouldn&#8217;t say, but did say that<strong> he&#8217;d be very surprised to see it going for less than $4,600 (USD) any time soon <em>(wink, wink)</em></strong>.</p>
<p>If you see anyone willing to sell you a D3 for anywhere near that price right now, ask yourself if it&#8217;s really too good to be true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/09/so-whats-the-d3s-dealer-wholesale-price/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>B&#038;H Photo Video</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/09/bh-photo-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/09/bh-photo-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 04:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/09/bh-photo-video/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do software and have worked with, in, and around software and computers since I was a kid. If you don&#8217;t work on software projects, you probably think that it&#8217;s just a wad of nerds sitting around banging on their keyboards.
But that&#8217;s rarely the case- most of the time, I&#8217;m trying to satisfy a client [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/category/989/Digital_Photography.html?BI=1474&amp;KW=&amp;KBID=1987&amp;img=digcams.gif"><img src="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/images/affiliateimages/digcams.gif" align="left" border="0" /></a><img src="http://affiliates.bhphotovideo.com/showban.asp?id=1987&amp;img=digcams.gif" align="left" border="0" />I do software and have worked with, in, and around software and computers since I was a kid. If you don&#8217;t work on software projects, you probably think that it&#8217;s just a wad of nerds sitting around banging on their keyboards.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s rarely the case- most of the time, I&#8217;m trying to satisfy a client who&#8217;s paying a ton of money to me (or a company I work with) to get that project finished and deployed.</p>
<p>So I have to bend over backwards and do whatever it takes to make them happy because they&#8217;re buying from me and I pride myself on customer service. I don&#8217;t pull any shenanigans, I&#8217;m up front and you know what to expect.</p>
<p>Because I treat my clients this way, I expect others to do the same and the only shop I deal with which consistently plays <strong>zero games</strong>, has <strong>never let me down</strong>, and <strong>truly plays it straight is B&amp;H Photo Video</strong>.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re a <strong>LARGE</strong> store in <strike>downtown</strike> Mid-town Manhattan. <strong>It&#8217;s like Disneyland for cameras</strong> and electronics of all sorts. It&#8217;s truly an awe-inspiring experience to go there and get to play with all the stuff you&#8217;ve been thinking about buying.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve even got this amazing over-head trolley system for the stuff you buy- you say you want a D3 and a 24-70mm and about a minute later, it&#8217;ll be waiting for you in the checkout area.</p>
<p><strong>Other stores can be hit or miss</strong>- lots of them like to charge your credit card when they <strong>think </strong>they&#8217;re going to get a shipment, or tell you that some thing&#8217;s in stock when it&#8217;s not- B&amp;H does not do this and that&#8217;s why they&#8217;ve earned my respect and business and why I&#8217;m now part of their affiliate system.</p>
<p>If you like NikonWatch and want to help support it, click on a B&amp;H link and then purchase whatever, it&#8217;ll cost you nothing extra and I&#8217;ll get a few bucks and thank you.</p>
<p><center><br />
</center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/09/bh-photo-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adorama Doesn&#8217;t Want To Give an Interview</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/08/adorama-doesnt-want-an-interview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/08/adorama-doesnt-want-an-interview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 03:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Regular Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/08/adorama-doesnt-want-an-interview/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#8217;s too bad, I wanted to have a sit down, on-the-record talk to them about their policies and how they handle various issues.
I&#8217;m unhappy they didn&#8217;t want to do that, but respect their position to handle each item one by one. I also compliment them on their having a specific person on staff to combat [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s too bad, I wanted to have a sit down, on-the-record talk to them about their policies and how they handle various issues.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m unhappy they didn&#8217;t want to do that, but respect their position to handle each item one by one. I also compliment them on their having a specific person on staff to combat all the problems that seem to arise on the various forums.</p>
<p>But there&#8217;s only one store I trust with my thousands of dollars of business&#8230;(next post)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/08/adorama-doesnt-want-an-interview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D700 Sample Shots</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/01/d700-sample-shots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/01/d700-sample-shots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 02:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[OFFICIAL F'ING NEWS!!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/01/d700-sample-shots/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just realized we got absolutely no leaked sample D700 shots, like we did with the D3&#8230; anyway, you&#8217;ll be happy to know that the D700 is capable of taking nice shots of hot chicks (but if you shoot them this close, you might have to have them shave first):
Here are the rest of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just realized we got absolutely no leaked sample D700 shots, like we did with the D3&#8230; anyway, you&#8217;ll be happy to know that the D700 is capable of taking nice shots of hot chicks (but if you shoot them this close, you might have to have them shave first):<br />
<center><img src="http://www.nikonwatch.com/images/d700sample.jpg" align="middle" border="2" hspace="2" vspace="2" /></center>Here are the <a href="http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/digitalcamera/slr/d700/sample.htm">rest of the samples</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/01/d700-sample-shots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New D3 Firmware&#8217;s Out! With Problems?</title>
		<link>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/01/new-firmwares-out-with-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/01/new-firmwares-out-with-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 01:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nikonwatch.com/2008/07/01/new-firmwares-out-with-problems/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
[Update: The birdie that said he was having a probl