Nikon 10-24mm AF-S Nikkor f/3.5-4.5G DX ED

Ken has a funny deal- he gives reviews to Nikon items that he either hasn’t held in his hands before, or as it appears in this case, he’s taken one shot outside of an office complex with!

But if you must know what he’s got to say, then take a look.

Basically, he says it’s better than the 12-24mm.

Either I’m missing something (hey, could be)- or the 12-24mm is going to go bye-bye. They’re basically similar lenses in every way that I can see. The question is “why”- why did Nikon release two lenses that compete against each other in almost every way?